that's just how contracts are these days
players only sign to giant long term contracts lol

REALLY don't want Klingberg at all. Guy can't play defense.

Forsberg is interesting but at that price I'd rather keep Miller.

Miller is not a top 15 scorer and being a good player at his age for only the last two and a half years is most certainly not the measure of consistency.

Besides that the Rangers don’t have the cap space next season to acquire Miller and resign Strome. So the Rangers would also be indirectly including Strome in your trade proposal as well. Not to mention the Rangers are not trading Schneider, unless a team ridiculously overpays for him.

to sign in the 2022 offszn you gotta go to the next year of acgm

So you want a bigger much bigger return for 1year of Miller as you paid for 5 years ?

If you’d like to sign players to your team, select “2022-23” from the drop-down menu.

When we traded for him, he was a solid top 9 player would put up 50ish points a season. Since we traded for him, he’s been an absolute beast averaging a point per game for the last three years so yes, definitely worth more than we trade for him

He’s been a very good player his whole career. He’s really broken out when given a bigger role on the team. I’m not sure how being the most consistent scorer on the Canucks while averaging a PPG since he joined the team is mot a measure of consistency. Also you’re right, he isn’t top 15 in scoring, he’s top 17…

5 years compared to 1

Above average top 9 player compared to top 20 point scorer in the NHL

It would be just Schneider for Miller straight up. Hard to see how Canucks would decline that.

thanks
but how do you do that

should be an option when creating the acgm where it says 2021-22

kk got it thanks

Schneider looks like a decent prospect and in a position of need for the Canucks. But Miller is one of the top scorers in the NHL, a leader and a game breaker with intangibles. He will not be traded for an unproven prospect. I believe Canucks would decline a 1-for-1 trade.