SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Third off season cap move if leafs dont win

Created by: CRC
Published: Jan. 17, 2022 at 6:40 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 102/200 (51%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Nashville PredatorsNashville Predators

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Granlund, MikaelNashville PredatorsNHL-$2,550,000111---0000--
Fabbro, DanteNashville PredatorsNHL-$1,224,000111---0000--
Ingram, ConnorNashville PredatorsMinor-$0011-------00
Evangelista, LukeWaivers ExemptNashville PredatorsJunior-$0011---0000--
2022 1st round pick (Logo of the Nashville PredatorsNSH)---100------
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Nashville PredatorsNSH)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hutchinson, MichaelToronto Maple LeafsMinor-$0011-------00
Holl, JustinToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$1,020,000111---0000--
Marner, MitchellToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$5,560,530111---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$10,812,7622142593710
Change-$2,806,5300-1-1-1-10
Final$8,006,232 (↓)2141 (↓)58 (↓)2 (↓)6 (↓)10000

Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsToronto Maple Leafs

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hutchinson, MichaelToronto Maple LeafsMinor-$0011-------00
Holl, JustinToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$1,020,000111---0000--
Marner, MitchellToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$5,560,530111---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Granlund, MikaelNashville PredatorsNHL-$2,550,000111---0000--
Fabbro, DanteNashville PredatorsNHL-$1,224,000111---0000--
Ingram, ConnorNashville PredatorsMinor-$0011-------00
Evangelista, LukeWaivers ExemptNashville PredatorsJunior-$0011---0000--
2022 1st round pick (Logo of the Nashville PredatorsNSH)---100------
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Nashville PredatorsNSH)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$185,655214669358
Change$2,806,530011110
Final$2,992,185 (↑)2147 (↑)70 (↑)4 (↑)6 (↑)8000
Jan. 17, 2022 at 6:45 p.m.
#1
FAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 660
Likes: 215
Just having some fun
Jan. 17, 2022 at 9:34 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 4,735
Quoting: CRC
Just having some fun


I don't think this is too far off.

As a Leafs fan, I'd like to see Mrazek in and Hutch out (Hutch is really a nothing). Take out Evangelista and Ingram and add in Tomisino.
Leafs have coveted Granlund for a long time.
I think the sticking point with NSH would be Fabbro. They'd probably rather part with Carrier which I would be ok with.
NSH could even keep the second (though I'll never turn down extra draft picks) LOL
Jan. 18, 2022 at 5:07 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,599
Likes: 5,193
Can't see any reason for NSH to consider this one. If they had any interest in Marner, a deal would have to take place before the deadline - not in the off-season.
You'd have to think they'd want Marner in their top six while they still have Forsber.
Marner's salary doesn't really let them re-sign Forsberg to a raise in the summer. Still, does adding Marner while losing their #1 center and a 1st pairing defenseman make them a stronger team? Probably not.

Quoting: Dutchies
I don't think this is too far off.

As a Leafs fan, I'd like to see Mrazek in and Hutch out (Hutch is really a nothing). Take out Evangelista and Ingram and add in Tomisino.
Leafs have coveted Granlund for a long time.
I think the sticking point with NSH would be Fabbro. They'd probably rather part with Carrier which I would be ok with.
NSH could even keep the second (though I'll never turn down extra draft picks) LOL


I'm afraid your tweaks make it a lot worse for NSH.
Carrier is better and cheaper than Forsberg, so that's not something they'd rather do.
Yeah Hutchinson has no value, but I assume he's just in the proposal so NSH has an AHL goalie to finish out the season with, if they're losing Ingram. Mrazek is a cap dump they're not going to want to take on. Cap space becomes even more of an issue with Fabbro's higher hit instead of Carrier's low salary, Mrazek making way too much to be a bad backup, and losing a cheap roster player on an ELC (Tomasino).
Jan. 18, 2022 at 6:15 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 4,735
Quoting: gmgb
Can't see any reason for NSH to consider this one. If they had any interest in Marner, a deal would have to take place before the deadline - not in the off-season.
You'd have to think they'd want Marner in their top six while they still have Forsber.
Marner's salary doesn't really let them re-sign Forsberg to a raise in the summer. Still, does adding Marner while losing their #1 center and a 1st pairing defenseman make them a stronger team? Probably not.



I'm afraid your tweaks make it a lot worse for NSH.
Carrier is better and cheaper than Forsberg, so that's not something they'd rather do.
Yeah Hutchinson has no value, but I assume he's just in the proposal so NSH has an AHL goalie to finish out the season with, if they're losing Ingram. Mrazek is a cap dump they're not going to want to take on. Cap space becomes even more of an issue with Fabbro's higher hit instead of Carrier's low salary, Mrazek making way too much to be a bad backup, and losing a cheap roster player on an ELC (Tomasino).


You're right on Mrazek, and IMO Tomisino should be close to untouchable for NSH. But I look at it this way: There are approx 30-40 current active forwards that have averaged 1 point a game in the NHL for their career (5 or more seasons played). That's almost guaranteed production which is what NSH truly needs (historically speaking). When a D man has lead your team in scoring more times over the past 5 years that a forward has, it's a desperate need.
That being said your right the ask I put in is probably too much. But the Leafs have a wealth of top end talent and need better depth for a long playoff run, and NSH has a wealth of depth but lacks the top end talent for a deep playoff run. Unfortunately for NSH, top end talent is more expensive than depth.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll