Sharks say no. We got players for those positions and even though Kerfoot is decent, we wouldn’t give up a 2nd.

3rd for Kerfoot and keep Dermont
may give up a late pick for Ritchie though he could rebound here since we play a similar style to boston

I wouldn’t pay for Ritchie

I agree on the 3rd for Kerfoot. If the sharks don’t resign Hertl he could help down the middle or just ship out Bonino if Hert does resign.

Bonino would be better as a wing at this stage in his career, just to slow to be a C
and Ritchie was pretty good with boston, i think his issue is more system and less him as a player. actually Labanc would do good in TOR and i think Ritchie would do good here, just like Barabanov has and he was worse with TOR.

So you traded a second and Holl for Manson, and now he walked? So you have Lyubushkin and rookie Rubins there instead of Holl?

I don't think that you're plus on that sequence.

Don't forget Muzzin has a list of teams he won't be traded to. Now l don't know if the list is given when the contract is signed or when they say their moving him? That will be a big issue next year because Dubas gave half the team a NTC or NMC.

CBJ accept.