SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Giroux to COL rumours

Created by: dls9
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 21, 2022
Published: Jan. 21, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$85,215,630$1,741,463$3,432,500-$3,715,630
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,137,500$4,137,500
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:31 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Not at that price. The Avs would be stupid to give up their best two non-NHL prospects.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:32 a.m.
#2
Silentfox1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 660
Likes: 214
Flyers take that and run
TJTwolf and Newgod77 liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:32 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
dls9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 313
Likes: 41
Quoting: TJTwolf
Not at that price. The Avs would be stupid to give up their best two non-NHL prospects.


maybe one of the two + a First?
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: dls9
maybe one of the two + a First?


Still too much, especially with no retention. Giroux is a rental the Avs simply don't really need.
Foppa21 and NMAvsFan liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:38 a.m.
#5
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
I don't think this rumor is realistic. We have plenty of 1st-line talent, there's no need to get him.
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:41 a.m.
#6
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
I would take him for his FO prowess and to add secondary scoring - which can come in handy come playoff time - but not at that price. I'd happily send them someone like Kaut or Bowers and a 3rd but that's about it. To me, if the asking price is that high, it's not at all worth it and there are other targets that wouldn't cost near as much that could address the Avs needs.
TJTwolf and Xqb15a liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 11:51 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: NMAvsFan
I would take him for his FO prowess and to add secondary scoring - which can come in handy come playoff time - but not at that price. I'd happily send them someone like Kaut or Bowers and a 3rd but that's about it. To me, if the asking price is that high, it's not at all worth it and there are other targets that wouldn't cost near as much that could address the Avs needs.


Agreed. He'd be a nice add if the price was right, and he'll probably fetch a late first (because it will be to a contender if it happens) and a decent prospect. The fact the Avs don't have a first in '22 is a problem, but there's also the fact he basically controls if and where he goes with the NMC. Flyers boards have him fetching back a first, Barron and Newhook. (I'll add that's trading him through Arizona to retain more salary though). That, like the above, is a pipe-dream unless Sakic starts doing drugs.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:03 p.m.
#8
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Quoting: NMAvsFan
I would take him for his FO prowess and to add secondary scoring - which can come in handy come playoff time - but not at that price. I'd happily send them someone like Kaut or Bowers and a 3rd but that's about it. To me, if the asking price is that high, it's not at all worth it and there are other targets that wouldn't cost near as much that could address the Avs needs.


Bowers has no value. I think a fair package for Giroux would be Kaut+1st. The dude can still play. If the Avs don’t need him, that’s fine. But that should be the asking price
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#9
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Bowers has no value. I think a fair package for Giroux would be Kaut+1st. The dude can still play. If the Avs don’t need him, that’s fine. But that should be the asking price


Bowers has value but he would be a bottom-six, PK guy. His skating is great but the Avs have done him no favors by not giving him a look at the NHL level. I get where you're coming from on the value level of Giroux and he definitely can still play but I wouldn't spend major assets on him (or anyone for that matter). To me, going to Seattle and getting Jarnkrok or Appleton would give the Avs what they need without breaking the bank.
AndrewLadd and TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,904
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Bowers has no value. I think a fair package for Giroux would be Kaut+1st. The dude can still play. If the Avs don’t need him, that’s fine. But that should be the asking price


I would have a hard time believing that’s a winning offer. Presumably a very late 2023 1st and an underwhelming prospect. Flyers can do better
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.
#11
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
Quoting: TJTwolf
Agreed. He'd be a nice add if the price was right, and he'll probably fetch a late first (because it will be to a contender if it happens) and a decent prospect. The fact the Avs don't have a first in '22 is a problem, but there's also the fact he basically controls if and where he goes with the NMC. Flyers boards have him fetching back a first, Barron and Newhook. (I'll add that's trading him through Arizona to retain more salary though). That, like the above, is a pipe-dream unless Sakic starts doing drugs.


That's hilarious. If Giroux were about 6-7 years younger, they can ask for that but asking for, essentially, three first rounders for a guy that is 34 is massively overvaluing your guy.
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.
#12
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Quoting: drmantalban
I would have a hard time believing that’s a winning offer. Presumably a very late 2023 1st and an underwhelming prospect. Flyers can do better


I’m wondering though what team would pay more for him. Maybe Nashville? But do they want to buy. Edmonton would be a good fit if they weren’t spiraling. Maybe LA?
Xqb15a and TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,339
Likes: 8,990
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Bowers has no value. I think a fair package for Giroux would be Kaut+1st. The dude can still play. If the Avs don’t need him, that’s fine. But that should be the asking price

And I think that’s a fair asking price that the Avs definitely consider. Unfortunately to many ACGM’s especially with aging stars are just ridiculous overpayments, half of the league has no cap space.
TJTwolf and AndrewLadd liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:19 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Bowers has no value. I think a fair package for Giroux would be Kaut+1st. The dude can still play. If the Avs don’t need him, that’s fine. But that should be the asking price


I wouldn't say Bowers has no value but I'd agree if you said it was pretty low as he projects to be likely bottom 6. Kaut plus a first I'd maybe consider. The big problem for the Avs would be cap because even at 50% retained that would likely be a no go without some other moves.
AndrewLadd liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
#15
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
Quoting: TJTwolf
I wouldn't say Bowers has no value but I'd agree if you said it was pretty low as he projects to be likely bottom 6. Kaut plus a first I'd maybe consider. The big problem for the Avs would be cap because even at 50% retained that would likely be a no go without some other moves.


Send them JTC, LOL
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,339
Likes: 8,990
Quoting: drmantalban
I would have a hard time believing that’s a winning offer. Presumably a very late 2023 1st and an underwhelming prospect. Flyers can do better

Who has cap space, need, and most important willingness to beat that offer? COL doesn’t need more scoring help, would more be nice sure, are they as the highest scoring team going to over pay for it no.
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:23 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,904
Quoting: AndrewLadd
I’m wondering though what team would pay more for him. Maybe Nashville? But do they want to buy. Edmonton would be a good fit if they weren’t spiraling. Maybe LA?


Yeah it’s always hard to say, some of these GMs don’t make decisions for the long haul like fans would. They have a shelf life and it can make for some puzzling moves.

I would suspect Bruins and Wild would have interest. LA and EDM possibly too yeah.
AndrewLadd liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:24 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Send them JTC, LOL


Problem there is that JTC does actually have value. He just got signed to a contract which looks bad in the Covid cap era and had a rough year last year. The Avs could certainly move him somewhere I'm sure but then it's robbing Peter (depth) to pay Paul.....or Claude.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:25 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: drmantalban
Yeah it’s always hard to say, some of these GMs don’t make decisions for the long haul like fans would. They have a shelf life and it can make for some puzzling moves.

I would suspect Bruins and Wild would have interest. LA and EDM possibly too yeah.


There's also the fact that Giroux very much controls if and where he goes with his NMC, and I doubt the Flyers would be looking to screw him over. They may also take a lesser offer to keep him happy, give him a run at a cup and look at re-signing him next year.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:26 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,904
Quoting: Xqb15a
Who has cap space, need, and most important willingness to beat that offer? COL doesn’t need more scoring help, would more be nice sure, are they as the highest scoring team going to over pay for it no.


Yeah I never said the Avs would go for him. I said that offer likely gets beat. 23 1st and Kaut isn’t disrespectful but its not exactly a knockout offer
Xqb15a liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:27 p.m.
#21
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
Quoting: TJTwolf
Problem there is that JTC does actually have value. He just got signed to a contract which looks bad in the Covid cap era and had a rough year last year. The Avs could certainly move him somewhere I'm sure but then it's robbing Peter (depth) to pay Paul.....or Claude.


He got lucky early in the season and is a pretty big possession sinkhole in all zones. His defense is also suspect. If they could swap Giroux for JTC, that's a big win.
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,904
Quoting: TJTwolf
There's also the fact that Giroux very much controls if and where he goes with his NMC, and I doubt the Flyers would be looking to screw him over. They may also take a lesser offer to keep him happy, give him a run at a cup and look at re-signing him next year.


I mean they’d likely ask him for a list of places he’d accept a trade to then go seek out max value. It would be idiotic business to take a lesser package because Claude prefers X city over Y.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:36 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: drmantalban
I mean they’d likely ask him for a list of places he’d accept a trade to then go seek out max value. It would be idiotic business to take a lesser package because Claude prefers X city over Y.


For sure they would but with the NMC he has the packages are likely going to be few and far between.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:37 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,481
Likes: 4,545
Quoting: NMAvsFan
He got lucky early in the season and is a pretty big possession sinkhole in all zones. His defense is also suspect. If they could swap Giroux for JTC, that's a big win.


Oh undoubtedly that wouldn't be a loss. Just not sure how the trade would look.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.
#25
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,676
Quoting: TJTwolf
Oh undoubtedly that wouldn't be a loss. Just not sure how the trade would look.


I can't see them wanting him but if they took him to help make the money work, they'd probably want something really good, like Barron. To me, not worth it to give them something like that since there are other guys out there who could shore up the bottom six at a cheaper price.
TJTwolf liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll