SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tougher

Created by: Bobcaygeon97
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 23, 2022
Published: Jan. 23, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
All in all I think this is a tougher team to play against while giving up some key prospect this team is better built to win now.
Tried to keep trades as what the "NHL insiders" have them at. I like to think this is fair value for both teams while keeping the CAP in mind for all teasm.
Enjoy.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$850,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Kane, Evander
2$1,500,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
Additional Details:
This is fair value for a player that ether team wont qualify next season.
BOS
  1. Kassian, Zack
  2. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Dach, Kirby
Additional Details:
Its a tough trade ether way, I think the Oilers need a little more jam and Dach gives that, on the other hand Oilers are giving up the superior talent. I think this works for both teams in the long run.
3.
EDM
  1. Price, Carey ($5,250,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Given the unknown risks for Price and the extended contract I believe this to be a very good deal for MTL, condition on Price being healthy for the stretch.
MTL
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Kesselring, Michael
  3. Koskinen, Mikko
  4. Skinner, Stuart
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
  6. 2024 4th round pick (EDM)
4.
EDM
  1. Giordano, Mark ($2,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
This works for both teams & because Calgary!
5.
EDM
  1. Miller, Colin
Additional Details:
Fair value by both.
BUF
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
6.
EDM
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
Additional Details:
That's a lot for Chychrun, but I believe that's what ARZ has been asking for.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$76,783,506$669,339$3,807,500$4,716,494
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Kane, Evander
$1,500,000$1,500,000
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,250,000$5,250,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$625,000$625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$842,500$842,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000 ($125,000$125K$125,000$125K)
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000 ($125,000$125K$125,000$125K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:10 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Boston declines quickly. Keep your cap dump. And Boston will qualify Debrusk next year if they don’t trade him. It’s only 750k raise. His ceiling is higher than his QO. Be piss poor management not to offer.

Give you Moore and Wagner for Kassian. They come off the books a year earlier. Best i’d do.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:16 p.m.
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Why would you want to trade Puljujarvi for Dach? Not a trade off I'd make.

The Bruins won't want Kassian so that trades a no go.

Even at half retained Price carries a lot of risk and you're giving up some good assets, I'd never do that.

I think Seattle would prefer a pick for Giordano.

Barrie should be worth Miller on his own, no need to add a pick, definitely not a 2nd anyway.

Yeah that might get you Chycrun, personally I think the Oilers would be better off to find a 2nd pair stop gap for this year whos way cheaper to acquire and hope Broberg is a 2nd pair LHD next season, really think Holland should be seeing what it'd take to get Da Haan from the Hawks.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:20 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: Gofnut999
Boston declines quickly. Keep your cap dump. And Boston will qualify Debrusk next year if they don’t trade him. It’s only 750k raise. His ceiling is higher than his QO. Be piss poor management not to offer.

Give you Moore and Wagner for Kassian. They come off the books a year earlier. Best i’d do.


No offence, Debrusk has 13 points in 33 games is playing on the 3rd line despite getting quality PP minutes. Boston has 13M in CAP next season, possible 14 if the CAP goes up by 1M and your going to give Debrusk 4.3M? I get not trading Kassian for him, but no team is offering anything remotely worth taking. At the same time they'll walk away from Debrusk. Boston has a whole 4th line to sign, RFA's as well as a RHD.......They're walking away.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:21 p.m.
#4
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 4,683
Switch the 2nd to a 1st instead in the hans trade, then add lavoie
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Why would you want to trade Puljujarvi for Dach? Not a trade off I'd make.

The Bruins won't want Kassian so that trades a no go.

Even at half retained Price carries a lot of risk and you're giving up some good assets, I'd never do that.

I think Seattle would prefer a pick for Giordano.

Barrie should be worth Miller on his own, no need to add a pick, definitely not a 2nd anyway.

Yeah that might get you Chycrun, personally I think the Oilers would be better off to find a 2nd pair stop gap for this year whos way cheaper to acquire and hope Broberg is a 2nd pair LHD next season, really think Holland should be seeing what it'd take to get Da Haan from the Hawks.


All great points. I asked those questions myself, thing is the Oilers are soft, they need some jam and JP is offensive but doesn't have that same jam as Dach does, yes a very risky trade but I like what Dach brings and he can be utilized in other areas.
The other thing I wanted to avoid is building for the future, Oilers should be done building, so trading a prospect like Broberg, the Oilers get an established defender now, not 3 years from now.
I mulled that Gio - Keith trade for a long time, Keith had conditions on coming to Edmonton but I freed up CAP while getting a equal type player, Keith only has a year left so I thought it would work but a pick could have been added for sure.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:27 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
Switch the 2nd to a 1st instead in the hans trade, then add lavoie


Nope, That's already a boat load of very good to great prospects for a player with a huge amount of risk. Also, Bourgault is a first round pick.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:32 p.m.
#7
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 4,683
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
Nope, That's already a boat load of very good to great prospects for a player with a huge amount of risk. Also, Bourgault is a first round pick.


Realize that buddy
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
No offence, Debrusk has 13 points in 33 games is playing on the 3rd line despite getting quality PP minutes. Boston has 13M in CAP next season, possible 14 if the CAP goes up by 1M and your going to give Debrusk 4.3M? I get not trading Kassian for him, but no team is offering anything remotely worth taking. At the same time they'll walk away from Debrusk. Boston has a whole 4th line to sign, RFA's as well as a RHD.......They're walking away.


Not at all.

See they offer him the 4.4 for 1 year. He signs he knows he’s stuck there again. He declines it Boston, or anyone, can sign him for whatever. Nobody is giving him an offer sheet Boston won’t match. So he can’t sign an offer sheet or he’s stuck there. But Boston can now trade his rights without the acquiring team needing to worry about the QO. His only other option is declining and going to Europe, not happening.

This is the problem when demand a trade and have no leverage.

As far as roster makeup goes.

Reilly and Forbort are both expendable as well as Zboril and Urho played when put in the lineup. Trade them both for picks there is 6m. Trade Nosek. Another 1.8. Moore and Wagner gone or bought out 2 to 4m.

No worries.

Debrusk is 25 and has averaged 20g per 82games. What’s the going rate for that? Go look around the league. 4.4 look way off? He was averaging 25 per 82 til last year. What happened? Concussion, Covid (3 times) zapped strength/energy. Forced to play offside out of need, sucks there. Depression. Fought with coach. Demoted after Hall trade. Wonder why he slumped? You think that’s who he is or the guy he was before all that?

He’s playing well. Points are not showing it. He’s looking more like the player from the first 3 years, actually better. He;’s playing defense now too.

No, if he’s not moved by the deadline, they QO him in the offseason. Sorry.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:38 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
Realize that buddy


ok, buddy. Thanks for the input
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:44 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: Gofnut999
Not at all.

See they offer him the 4.4 for 1 year. He signs he knows he’s stuck there again. He declines it Boston, or anyone, can sign him for whatever. Nobody is giving him an offer sheet Boston won’t match. So he can’t sign an offer sheet or he’s stuck there. But Boston can now trade his rights without the acquiring team needing to worry about the QO. His only other option is declining and going to Europe, not happening.

This is the problem when demand a trade and have no leverage.

As far as roster makeup goes.

Reilly and Forbort are both expendable as well as Zboril and Urho played when put in the lineup. Trade them both for picks there is 6m. Trade Nosek. Another 1.8. Moore and Wagner gone or bought out 2 to 4m.

No worries.

Debrusk is 25 and has averaged 20g per 82games. What’s the going rate for that? Go look around the league. 4.4 look way off? He was averaging 25 per 82 til last year. What happened? Concussion, Covid (3 times) zapped strength/energy. Forced to play offside out of need, sucks there. Depression. Fought with coach. Demoted after Hall trade. Wonder why he slumped? You think that’s who he is or the guy he was before all that?

He’s playing well. Points are not showing it. He’s looking more like the player from the first 3 years, actually better. He;’s playing defense now too.

No, if he’s not moved by the deadline, they QO him in the offseason. Sorry.


You said it all in the 1st paragraph. it all comes down to would you sign DeBrusk at 4.3M? Nobody is trading for that player unless its to unload something useless as well. I just don't see a real solid trade coming back and Boston offering him a one year contract doesn't help the team, they have to much to sign and limited CAP.
I think it comes down to what the Oilers did with AA, that blew up in Holland face. Its a kick in the junk. Its also a CAP world and Boston needs that space.
Debrusk is not a 20G score, He's a 14.6 goal scorer in his career, so round up he's a 15 goal score or a third liner.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:48 p.m.
#11
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
All great points. I asked those questions myself, thing is the Oilers are soft, they need some jam and JP is offensive but doesn't have that same jam as Dach does, yes a very risky trade but I like what Dach brings and he can be utilized in other areas.
The other thing I wanted to avoid is building for the future, Oilers should be done building, so trading a prospect like Broberg, the Oilers get an established defender now, not 3 years from now.
I mulled that Gio - Keith trade for a long time, Keith had conditions on coming to Edmonton but I freed up CAP while getting a equal type player, Keith only has a year left so I thought it would work but a pick could have been added for sure.


Dach has jam? I haven't seen that in the Hawks games I've watched, his point production isn't very good, its no better then Debrusk's and I'd imagine Dach sees more top 6 minutes then Debrusk has this year. I'd keep Puljujarvi myself, can't say I've watched a ton of Dach but it seems like he was rushed and has had some injuries already, I'd just stay with JP.

I sort of see Edmonton in a position where they both need to be improving now and still build for the future due to years of mismanagement and Hollands current fumbles with trades and signings, really think that having Bouchard and Broberg as top 4 dmen on ELCs would be HUGE for Edmonton next year with Nurse's massive extension starting.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:49 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,499
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
No offence, Debrusk has 13 points in 33 games is playing on the 3rd line despite getting quality PP minutes. Boston has 13M in CAP next season, possible 14 if the CAP goes up by 1M and your going to give Debrusk 4.3M? I get not trading Kassian for him, but no team is offering anything remotely worth taking. At the same time they'll walk away from Debrusk. Boston has a whole 4th line to sign, RFA's as well as a RHD.......They're walking away.


Lol he's 10th in PP TOI and gets looks on the 2nd unit. I wouldn't call that quality PP time. Boston has a whole 4th line to sign?

Frederic - signed for next year
Nosek - signed for next year
Foligno - signed for next year

Hey look at that they have a 4th line that's all signed for next year sarcasm
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:56 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Dach has jam? I haven't seen that in the Hawks games I've watched, his point production isn't very good, its no better then Debrusk's and I'd imagine Dach sees more top 6 minutes then Debrusk has this year. I'd keep Puljujarvi myself, can't say I've watched a ton of Dach but it seems like he was rushed and has had some injuries already, I'd just stay with JP.

I sort of see Edmonton in a position where they both need to be improving now and still build for the future due to years of mismanagement and Hollands current fumbles with trades and signings, really think that having Bouchard and Broberg as top 4 dmen on ELCs would be HUGE for Edmonton next year with Nurse's massive extension starting.


You must have missed that Play in series with the Oilers then when Chicago eliminated the Oilers. Dach is better that DeBrusk.

Broberg was terrible in his time up with the club this year, at best he's two years away.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 4:57 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Edited Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:09 p.m.
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
You said it all in the 1st paragraph. it all comes down to would you sign DeBrusk at 4.3M? Nobody is trading for that player unless its to unload something useless as well. I just don't see a real solid trade coming back and Boston offering him a one year contract doesn't help the team, they have to much to sign and limited CAP.
I think it comes down to what the Oilers did with AA, that blew up in Holland face. Its a kick in the junk. Its also a CAP world and Boston needs that space.
Debrusk is not a 20G score, He's a 14.6 goal scorer in his career, so round up he's a 15 goal score or a third liner.



Wrong again. You are doing the numbers by season. I am doing it per 82 games. Someone who scores 10 in 40 averages 20 in 82.

16 in 70
27 in 68
19 in 70
11 in 75

73X82/283 = 21.15 per 82.

That’s the way all calculate a per season average is by 82 games

You also did not follow the bouncing ball. Boston gives Debrusk the QO….HE DECLINES…which means any team, Boston or an acquiring team, can sign for league minimum. Obviously that won’t happen but once he declines the QO the 4.4 has been rejected and he can be signed for less. 😉

If Boston was willing to move him for garbage and cap dumps he’d been gone already. They get something they want or they hold him, QO him, and start all over again next year.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:09 p.m.
#15
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
You must have missed that Play in series with the Oilers then when Chicago eliminated the Oilers. Dach is better that DeBrusk.

Broberg was terrible in his time up with the club this year, at best he's two years away.


I didn't watch that series but lots of guys have good series or look good in small sample sizes, I don't doubt Dach is better then Debrusk but their point totals are very similar, even on a struggling Hawks team you'd expect better from a guy drafted so early.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:09 p.m.
#16
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Quoting: Gofnut999
Wrong again. You are doing the numbers by season. I am doing it per 82 games. Someone who scores 10 in 40 averages 20 in 82.

16 in 70
27 in 68
19 in 70
11 in 75

73X82/283 = 21.15 per 82.

That’s the way all calculate a per season average is by 82 games

You also did not follow the bouncing ball. Boston gives Debrusk the QO….HE DECLINES…which means any team, Boston or an acquiring team, can sign for league minimum. Obviously that won’t happen but once he declines the QO the 4.4 has been rejected and he can be signed for less. 😉

If Boston was willing to move him for garbage and cap dumps he’d been gone already. They get something they want or they hold him, QO him, and start all over again next year.


Debrusk has played mostly 3rd line for Boston this year yeah?
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:11 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,573
Likes: 5,453
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
No offence, Debrusk has 13 points in 33 games is playing on the 3rd line despite getting quality PP minutes. Boston has 13M in CAP next season, possible 14 if the CAP goes up by 1M and your going to give Debrusk 4.3M? I get not trading Kassian for him, but no team is offering anything remotely worth taking. At the same time they'll walk away from Debrusk. Boston has a whole 4th line to sign, RFA's as well as a RHD.......They're walking away.


There's that thing called re-signing a player to a multi-year contract to a lower AAV over a one-year qualifying offer. DeBrusk knows he won't get $4.41M if he becomes a UFA. And anyways, that won't be Boston's decision since he will be traded by that time.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:13 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Debrusk has played mostly 3rd line for Boston this year yeah?


Yup he’s been on all 4 lines but mostly 3rd. March and Hall in front of him. Depth chart matters.
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:15 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: Gofnut999
Wrong again. You are doing the numbers by season. I am doing it per 82 games. Someone who scores 10 in 40 averages 20 in 82.

16 in 70
27 in 68
19 in 70
11 in 75

73X82/283 = 21.15 per 82.

You also did not follow the bouncing ball. Boston gives Debrusk the QO….HE DECLINES…which means any team, Boston or an acquiring team, can sign for league minimum. Obviously that won’t happen but once he declines the QO the 4.4 has been rejected and he can be signed for less. 😉


Except he hasn't played 82 games so his average isn't over 82. thus, your numbers are off..
So how does that benefit Boston today or tomorrow? That's what I've been getting at, he's walking or Boston isn't qualifying him.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:21 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I didn't watch that series but lots of guys have good series or look good in small sample sizes, I don't doubt Dach is better then Debrusk but their point totals are very similar, even on a struggling Hawks team you'd expect better from a guy drafted so early.


Dach has 14 points and is a RHD centreman who can play the wing, he's versatile and huge, he dominated down low on the Oilers in that series and his projection is very high, as I said, JP brings more offence but Dach brings more to the table in a complete game and is more versatile.
Not a lot of people will like the trade, I get that, but I stand by it. Oilers need a tougher line up.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:23 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 374
Likes: 112
Replace the second,kesselring and the 4th for a first rounder and Montréal accept
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:24 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
Except he hasn't played 82 games so his average isn't over 82. thus, your numbers are off..
So how does that benefit Boston today or tomorrow? That's what I've been getting at, he's walking or Boston isn't qualifying him.


Go to any analytical or statistical site man. They do an 82 game average not a seasonal average. It’d called prorating. A season is 82 games long so they calculate what an 82 game average is for each player for a fair comparison.

So you don’t think a team would have more interest in Debrusk knowing they can sign him for whatever they want to as opposed to potentially having to lock in at 1 for 4.4.? You don’t think Boston themselves would have more interest in signing Debrusk for less. You don’t think a smaller contract makes him more attractive league wide?

Can’t help you if you can’t follow.

Believe what you want. Just understand…you are wrong. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:38 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: Marchy6363
Replace the second, kesselring and the 4th for a first rounder and Montréal accept


I don't think I do that then, MTL is receiving Bourgault, He is the first round pick. Kesselring is a huge RHD defensive D-man and is closing in on the NHL. Had a good first year and had a great post season. This season he's playing regular top 4 minutes and is very good skater for a tree. There is a player there.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:40 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: Gofnut999
Go to any analytical or statistical site man. They do an 82 game average not a seasonal average. It’d called prorating. A season is 82 games long so they calculate what an 82 game average is for each player for a fair comparison.

So you don’t think a team would have more interest in Debrusk knowing they can sign him for whatever they want to as opposed to potentially having to lock in at 1 for 4.4.? You don’t think Boston themselves would have more interest in signing Debrusk for less. You don’t think a smaller contract makes him more attractive league wide?

Can’t help you if you can’t follow.

Believe what you want. Just understand…you are wrong. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Quoting: Gofnut999
Go to any analytical or statistical site man. They do an 82 game average not a seasonal average. It’d called prorating. A season is 82 games long so they calculate what an 82 game average is for each player for a fair comparison.

So you don’t think a team would have more interest in Debrusk knowing they can sign him for whatever they want to as opposed to potentially having to lock in at 1 for 4.4.? You don’t think Boston themselves would have more interest in signing Debrusk for less. You don’t think a smaller contract makes him more attractive league wide?

Can’t help you if you can’t follow.

Believe what you want. Just understand…you are wrong. 🤷🏻‍♂️


will see, if DeBrusk gets traded its going to be underwhelming, ether DeBrusk will walk or the Bruins will.
Book it.
Jan. 23, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Quoting: Bobcaygeon97
will see, if DeBrusk gets traded its going to be underwhelming, ether DeBrusk will walk or the Bruins will.
Book it.


If they wanted garbage he’d been gone already. They have had offers. They made it clear they won’t trade him just accommodate him. They get what they want or they don’t move him. Period. What they want may change over the next month, they did not want picks before, that may change.

I don’t think he will be on the roster to start the season next year. But i thought that last year too. But it will not come from the scenario of not giving him his QO if he’s still with them at that point…unless he pulls a PDL and pouts and tanks. It’s just piss poor asset management. They won’t let him walk away for nothing when there is zero need too.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll