SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Clearing Cap Space and Filling Needs 3

Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 3, 2022
Published: Feb. 3, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This is only for fun so don't take it too serious. Feel free to offer suggestions to make a trade better. So in my first two attempts I have been accused of overpays and underpays which tells me I'm probably on the right track because a good trade usually falls somewhere in the middle. I have changed a few things up this time to maximize Boston's return.

1. Isles defense are terrible. They will be letting both Chara and Greene walk in the off-season and may trade Mayfield by the deadline. They're going to need someone now and for the next couple years. I've seen an Isles fan offer a third and a player for Reilly in another thread but I'm more interested with dumping salary here so just want the pick.

2. Arizona has made themselves available to absord cap hits. Don't really buy a lot with this move but do obtain a servicable bottom pair D that doesn't fit into the Yotes plans. They get a pick, a prospect and can even give Senyshyn a no risk try out for the rest of the season to see if he can pan out. Nobody wanted him on waivers so just moving on is better for the Bruins.

3. For Seattle, Debrusk is equal or better than Jarnkrok and is much younger. Both players are capable of being 20 goal scorers but neither has lived up to that this year for different reasons but both are starting to play well. Having a player in the lineup that has asked for a trade is bad for morale so cut our losses and get a piece back that can help the team. Nosek is better than Sheahan and younger as well. Seattle absorbs the higher cap hit but gets younger players as a trade off and Nosek has another year left on a decent contract. Wagner adds some grit to their 4th line and is mostly just a throw in but would be an upgrade for Seattle. He has also already cleared waivers so they don't need to bring him up unless needed.

4. Need a little more cap space so Clifton is a casuality and sent out for a draft pick. San Jose is short on right hand defense in their system so a mid round pick for a young physical D on a cheap contract makes sense for them.

5. Plenty of cap space so now it's time to put the screws to Vegas who is under the gun to move some contracts. Martinez fits a LD1 need and with his cap hit they will have to pay to move it. It's going to cost them a 1st round pick to move 3 years at 5.25 mil for a 34 year old.

Those first five deals need to be done sooner rather than later or risk missing the Vegas dump.

5. Lastly, if Pavelski is willing to come to the Bruins a first round pick, a prospect and a young player will hopefully do the trick for a rental at his age. Dallas retains half his salary to make the cap hit work.

There is some give and take in these moves. Sometimes giving a little more to get necessary cap space and sometimes getting a lot more than I'm giving away. In the end, if all this gets done, I think the Bruins have a chance at making a nice playoff run and haven't sacrificed the future to do it.

Be gentle. 🤣✌
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (NYI)
2.
3.
4.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (SJS)
5.
BOS
  1. Martinez, Alec
  2. 2023 1st round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. 2022 5th round pick (BOS)
6.
BOS
  1. Pavelski, Joe ($3,500,000 retained)
DAL
  1. Berglund, Victor
  2. Frederic, Trent
  3. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,794,841$1,956,507$207,500$1,705,159
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,299
Likes: 4,694
Quoting: BRUINSfansEVERYWHERE
Yeah thought that might be high but I can see a 4th. He has a low cap hit and is a good 3rd pair RD. Better than anything they will get with a 4th round pick and he can step in now.


i don't Hate Clifton for a 4th but sharks have too many D men and need to give Merkley a chance, Merkley will most likely be a mainstay after the break.
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:40 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 96
Likes: 18
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
i don't Hate Clifton for a 4th but sharks have too many D men and need to give Merkley a chance, Merkley will most likely be a mainstay after the break.


That's reasonable if that's what they want to do. Even having Clifton for a 4th RD might be beneficial though.
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:44 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 3,682
Quoting: BRUINSfansEVERYWHERE
I said that was probably high and said a 4th is a better fit. You really can't take this year as an example because the whole Bruins team was a mess to start the season with all the changes that happened and the screwed up schedule they had. Boston was really bad to start the season and SJ actually started pretty strong. Clifton was a Cassidy sacrifice like he likes to do. Then a couple players he was replaced with played zome good hockey and took his spot. Go take a look at video from his 2019 playoffs and then come back and tell me he can't be a solid 3rd line D. I'm not saying he will be better than these guys in a few years but today he is a better player.
But hey, if it hurts you guys so much for me to suggest the trade I'll trade him somewhere else. Just thought the Sharks could benefit from him. Apparently I was wrong because you guys say so. 🤷‍♂️


The Classic response of well you can’t use those stats even though they are most relevant, use other stats that support my idea. I wouldn’t pay a 4th for him either
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:44 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,299
Likes: 4,694
Quoting: BRUINSfansEVERYWHERE
That's reasonable if that's what they want to do. Even having Clifton for a 4th RD might be beneficial though.


not argueing that, but the sharks have been solid drafting in the middle rounds lately.
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:45 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
that seattle trade is awful for boston. not sure dallas accepts that.
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:46 p.m.
#31
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 96
Likes: 18
Quoting: glarson17
The Classic response of well you can’t use those stats even though they are most relevant, use other stats that support my idea. I wouldn’t pay a 4th for him either


Cool man. Good luck with the team you manage. 👍✌😝
Feb. 3, 2022 at 1:55 p.m.
#32
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 96
Likes: 18
Quoting: shmoeman
that seattle trade is awful for boston. not sure dallas accepts that.


The seattle trade is more about moving salary. Jarnkrok is actually looking pretty good and will fit into Coyles style of play on the third line. I think he can bring offense in a different way than Debrusk but bring just as much if not more. Sheahan is just a big body to fill in on the fourth line. We are never going to get what we think Debrusk is worth. It will look like a bad trade in the future I'm sure but removing the trade cloud is important for morale and it also clears cap space. Nosek is also a cap casuality to make room for the two big contracts. Wagner might actually get to back to the bigs in Seattle. We owe him that much.

As for Dallas, if they don't want a versatile, physical forward, a prospect and a 1st round pick for a 36 year old UFA than they can keep him and maybe lose him for nothing. Some people say I'm offering too much. That usually means I've found a sweet spot for a trade. 🤣
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll