SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL time

Created by: leafsFan1996
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 13, 2022
Published: Feb. 13, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Addresses a few problems:
1) Top 4 right D. If Murphy doesn't work with Muzz, I think Sandin can play a top 4 role with Murphy as his partner
2) top 9 forwards. Leafs have a great top 9, but injuries will happen. They have a lot of guys that can fill in on the 4th line, but not further up the lineup. Jarnkrok can play any F position and is a good forechecker. Ho-Sang could be a top-9 guy but hes played in the A all year and might not fit a role. good low risk add, and an upgrade over Ritchie who was big for nothing and slow as hell.
3) Tougness, but not taking a way skill. swapping Dermott for Schenn adds a tough element and he can pk which dermott can't.
4) they can be soft in front of their own net, Murphy and Schenn address that without stripping their ability to move pucks out of the zone and defend the rush which they are already good at
5) cap none-sense they've not been able to load manage Spezza and Simmer, according to this they'll be able to do that now.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Ho-Sang, Josh
1$750,000
Trades
1.
TOR
ARI
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
VAN
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. 2023 6th round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor ($1,850,000 retained)
Additional Details:
the retention only works on this deal not the extension
CHI
  1. Hirvonen, Roni [Reserve List]
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Kokkonen, Mikko [Reserve List]
  4. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
4.
TOR
  1. Järnkrok, Calle ($500,000 retained)
SEA
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,383,116$0$400,000$1,116,884

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$500,000$500,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Ho-Sang, Josh
$750,000$750,000
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 13, 2022 at 2:12 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 10,515
Keep Kokko and Hiro, and add a prospect with some actual upside and value. Then you're closer to a trade for Murphy.
Feb. 13, 2022 at 2:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1,170
canucks decline.Shenn is having a great year.not sure why we would trade him.imo
PeterForsberg21 liked this.
Feb. 13, 2022 at 3:57 p.m.
#3
Lambchopz17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 479
Quoting: Garak
Keep Kokko and Hiro, and add a prospect with some actual upside and value. Then you're closer to a trade for Murphy.


Kokkonen and Hirvonen are both very solid prospects. A first, 2 2nds (the value of those 2 prospects averaged out) for an upgrade but nothing major upgrade from Holl to Murphy is an overpay
leafsFan1996 liked this.
Feb. 13, 2022 at 6:08 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
You might feel the value for Murphy is fair and you could have a solid argument but that doesn't mean CHI would be interested in making this move. Yes the 1st is always appreciated though it will be later and likely improve wish Murphy solid D game, however its the other parts of this deal which are the main reason for CHI likely declining, its more so that the prospects don't project to be much more than what we currently have. Taking Murphy will likely require a slight overpay due to his importance and term.
Feb. 13, 2022 at 6:12 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 10,515
Quoting: Lambchopz
Kokkonen and Hirvonen are both very solid prospects. A first, 2 2nds (the value of those 2 prospects averaged out) for an upgrade but nothing major upgrade from Holl to Murphy is an overpay


Not really. They probably never make it to the NHL. And if they do, it's probably very short lived bottom 6 roles. Murphy and Holl are completely different players. But even then Murphy is WAY more than a "slight upgrade" from Holl. Are you one of those guys that looks at plus/minus and thinks they're an expert?
Feb. 14, 2022 at 8:50 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 416
Likes: 160
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
You might feel the value for Murphy is fair and you could have a solid argument but that doesn't mean CHI would be interested in making this move. Yes the 1st is always appreciated though it will be later and likely improve wish Murphy solid D game, however its the other parts of this deal which are the main reason for CHI likely declining, its more so that the prospects don't project to be much more than what we currently have. Taking Murphy will likely require a slight overpay due to his importance and term.


LA traded Muzzin for a first, Grundstrom and Durzi. I followed this template (1st, 2 ok prosects) and added Holl to make the money work.
Feb. 14, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.
#7
Lambchopz17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 479
Quoting: Garak
Not really. They probably never make it to the NHL. And if they do, it's probably very short lived bottom 6 roles. Murphy and Holl are completely different players. But even then Murphy is WAY more than a "slight upgrade" from Holl. Are you one of those guys that looks at plus/minus and thinks they're an expert?


“Very short lived role”, what? Hirvonen was projected by some to be a late first round pick in that very draft, and Kokkonen a 2nd rounder in his. Both have had solid production in their respective leagues for players of their age. For long term, Hirvonen projects to be a very solid 3rd liner, whereas Kokkonen will likely be an above average bottom pair d man. They won’t be insane players no, but very good role players, which is extremely important for building a supporting cast. Think of Hirvonen as a Blake Coleman type of guy, very solid two way forechecker
Feb. 14, 2022 at 6:08 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 10,515
Quoting: Lambchopz
“Very short lived role”, what? Hirvonen was projected by some to be a late first round pick in that very draft, and Kokkonen a 2nd rounder in his. Both have had solid production in their respective leagues for players of their age. For long term, Hirvonen projects to be a very solid 3rd liner, whereas Kokkonen will likely be an above average bottom pair d man. They won’t be insane players no, but very good role players, which is extremely important for building a supporting cast. Think of Hirvonen as a Blake Coleman type of guy, very solid two way forechecker


Sure. But CHI is already loaded with bottom 6 NHLers and prospects. And this offer is not worth moving Murphy.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll