I can guarantee you 2 things, 1. Montreal is not giving up Lehkonen for a player they can most likely pick up off waivers next season. 2. Are not moving Lehkonen to add depth to their strongest position organizationally. We need RHD, LW and C not LHD or RW.

sure why not

MTL declines

Gorton would most certainly want Kravtsov before Hajek

TOR declines but someone else with cap space might accept if we’re lucky

I like the Stars trade. Curious to see what Stars fans feel about it.

Not sure if the last two are the most necessary but the San Jose one seems fair. Vegas is overpaying in their trade however.

As far as organizational needs go we would want Lundqvist or Schneider (we would have to add and Schneider is likely off limits) or Otheman since our needs are top 6 LW, Top 4 RD or middle 6 C

By we do you mean Dallas?

Montreal

The only one of these that seems realistic is the Sharks one. The Dallas one is kind of close though, it depends if Pavelski wants to got to New York and if Dallas can re-sign him.

Cogliano is actually having a solid season points wise (for him), still pretty damn fast, pesky, and an amazing PK guy.
but a 4th is reasonable IMO.

Yeah none of those guys are getting traded for Lehkonen, i could see Kravtsov though

Yeah as for TOR trade i know they wouldnt work but they were just the first team who would want Nemeth that came to mind

And as for MTL trade i didnt see Hajek as the main piece and i think that a 2nd and Hajek is fair for Lehkonen

For VGK trade so many teams (ex Vegas, Edmonton, Colorado) need goalies and there aren’t that many on the block so i figure one will overpay like we see every TDL

Hajek was kinda just a throw in there i think a 2nd is about where Lehkonen’s value is

Yeah i always kinda liked him and wanted the rangers to sign him in the off-season and assuming sjs isnt gearing up for a deep run i think its fair

yea we falling out of the playoff position fast and by march we should be looking at selling not buying.

Nope there are a lot of teams looking at Lehkonen and the price is set at a 1st because of that.

For 50 games of def w Lehk. You don't say...

it would be 1.5 years of Lehky since he is an RFA and you don't like the price stop trying to acquire him.

That's the problem with Lehk, Buch, JTM, Boeser, Laine. Like most teams, with ongoing flat cap, can't/won't overpay these guys by 1m. Lehk locked up @ 2.5m-3.5m = yuk

Right cause what moronic team would want to pay a 3rd liner 3.6 Mil (Goodrow). When they could have Lehkonen at 2.5-3 Mil

Apples & oranges

Lehkonen is miles better defensively than Goodrow, younger, cheaper and has similar offensive abilities. So you are right it's Apples to Oranges with Lehkonen being the golden apple when compared to Goodrow.

Lol. You don't know Goodrow? You'll get flashbacks when playoff races start. He's exactly what the Dr ordered. Go ahead, give Lehk the ol Armia deal lol