SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Moves

Created by: EnKay29
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2022
Published: Feb. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Hagel, Brandon
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Hagel can play top 6 besides willy and JT. Good piece locked up for the next 3 years at a reasonable cost.
CHI
  1. Anderson, Joey
  2. Hirvonen, Roni [Reserve List]
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
This trade is very similar to the Barclay Goodrow trade a few years ago but with an added prospect. Chicago moves up about 90 spots in the draft because its a late 3rd coming back. Hirvonen is a second round pick producing well in Liiga this year. Contract can fill an NHL sport but he is mainly an NHL deal coming back
2.
TOR
  1. Reunanen, Tarmo
  2. 2022 6th round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Leafs get cap space and a late pick. Reunanen is just contract filler so if he is valued by the ranger just swap him with anyone else.
NYR
  1. Ritchie, Nick
Additional Details:
Rangers have prioritized size and physicality recently and Ritchie provides that. They have 36 Million in cap at the deadline so they can take Ritchies money and now hamper any moves. Also, if it does not go well he can be bought out next year and only count for 300k towards the cap,
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,283,116$0$400,000$216,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
It's been widely reported Chicago has turned down multiple offers of a 1st and a prospect for Hagel so don't think this motivates them either
exo2769 and Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:25 p.m.
#2
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,870
Likes: 5,857
That Hagel trade goes through over my dead body.
exo2769 and Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:26 p.m.
#3
Mods have power egos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 1,279
Wasn't Ritchie on waivers...
palhal and exo2769 liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:27 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
yeah, Hagel isnt getting that
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:30 p.m.
#5
TopDawgReese
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 253
Im a Leafs fan and I’ll say this. Don’t trade any of our forward prospects as we will need them. Our defence is pretty much set as we have 5 dman with term or we own rights to that are impact players in the NHL already. With that being said Niemela we are probably gonna sell high on at the deadline.

Niemela is at least 3 years away from being in the league, and it better to sell high on him as from what I’ve seen from him he’s gonna be a number 3 dman at best or Dermott at worse.

Now you trade a 2023 1st, Mikheyev and Neimela and get Hagel it’s a win for everyone.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:32 p.m.
#6
New York Rangers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 522
NYR decline, you need to give us something to eat Ritchie
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:48 p.m.
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,794
Likes: 22,822
Yes, Hagel is nice but why do the Leafs need him? Bird/Kerfoot/Mikeheyev/Engvall are good on the left wing. Robertson and Amirov. Not saying Hawks take the deal, but it seems unnecessary.
I don't know how any team 36m in cap space. Can Ritchie even play in the Rangers top 12?
ChiHawk and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:49 p.m.
#8
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,686
Likes: 9,839
This isn't enough for Hagel. The difference between the Goodrow trade and Hagel is Goodrow had 2 playoff runs and Hagel will provide at the very least 3. Hagel is also an RFA at the end of the deal where Goodrow was a UFA. Hagel has a higher ceiling than Goodrow too. Goodrow was 26 and had a .37ppg season. Hagel is 23 with a .63ppg season. Darn near double the production.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 5:59 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 578
Ranger have no need for Ritchie and his contract.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:10 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
yeah, Hagel isnt getting that


Here you go again LMAO laugh
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:11 p.m.
#11
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,686
Likes: 9,839
Quoting: ChiHawk
Here you go again LMAO laugh


Well technically he's right. Hagel isn't getting that. He'd get more.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
That Hagel trade goes through over my dead body.


Yep, ima have to fly over to stop this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: ChiHawk
Here you go again LMAO laugh


oh im sorry, did the black hawks leak you some info that he was in fact getting that?
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
#14
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,996
Likes: 1,453
Quoting: exo2769
Goodrow had 2 playoff runs and Hagel will provide at the very least 3.!!! Hagel has a higher ceiling. Darn near double the production.


Funny stuff right there...
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:43 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: exo2769
Well technically he's right. Hagel isn't getting that. He'd get more.


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
oh im sorry, did the black hawks leak you some info that he was in fact getting that?


LMAO yup, this Leafs guy isn't watching the new and was leaked
Feb. 17, 2022 at 6:51 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO yup, this Leafs guy isn't watching the new and was leaked


im sorry do you work for the leafs and know they offered this? 100%? are you part of Kyle Dubas' team?
Feb. 17, 2022 at 7:05 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
im sorry do you work for the leafs and know they offered this? 100%? are you part of Kyle Dubas' team?


Well we know what some teams offered and similar to this and was declined, so yeah, the Hawks will get more if they decide to move Hagel....kind of simple
thesaadfather liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 7:08 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: ChiHawk
Well we know what some teams offered and similar to this and was declined, so yeah, the Hawks will get more if they decide to move Hagel....kind of simple


so you dont know that the leafs offered this then? huh, i thought you said that the report totally proved that the leafs would do this! crazy.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 7:10 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
so you dont know that the leafs offered this then? huh, i thought you said that the report totally proved that the leafs would do this! crazy.


You said "Hagel isn't getting that" someone else responded "yeah he's right. he will get more" that is based on the news that came out and what the hawks are asking for Hagel so no, Hawks aren't touching this and doesn't matter what the leafs would do or not, Hawks aren't accepting these kind of offers...follow along please smile
thesaadfather liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 7:15 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: ChiHawk
You said "Hagel isn't getting that" someone else responded "yeah he's right. he will get more" that is based on the news that came out and what the hawks are asking for Hagel so no, Hawks aren't touching this and doesn't matter what the leafs would do or not, Hawks aren't accepting these kind of offers...follow along please smile


yes, that package, from the leafs. He isnt getting that from the leafs. And nah, he's not gonna get more either and just because one team offered a 1st and a good prospect doesnt mean that it was a package as good as this because it could have literally been colorado's 2025 1st and Foudy.
And we have already been over this other part, just because the hawks want an over payment does not mean they will get one, and that is perfectly ok because they dont have a reason to move him for less.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 9:12 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
yes, that package, from the leafs. He isnt getting that from the leafs. And nah, he's not gonna get more either and just because one team offered a 1st and a good prospect doesnt mean that it was a package as good as this because it could have literally been colorado's 2025 1st and Foudy.
And we have already been over this other part, just because the hawks want an over payment does not mean they will get one, and that is perfectly ok because they dont have a reason to move him for less.


"The Blackhawks have received multiple offers consisting of a 1st and decent prospect for Hagel but have declined"
thesaadfather liked this.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 9:16 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: ChiHawk
"The Blackhawks have received multiple offers consisting of a 1st and decent prospect for Hagel but have declined"


so again, you have no idea what value that actually is and no information that the leafs have offered them anything like above. Or are you on the inside and know what was offered for sure?
Feb. 17, 2022 at 10:29 p.m.
#23
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Im a Leafs fan and I’ll say this. Don’t trade any of our forward prospects as we will need them. Our defence is pretty much set as we have 5 dman with term or we own rights to that are impact players in the NHL already. With that being said Niemela we are probably gonna sell high on at the deadline.

Niemela is at least 3 years away from being in the league, and it better to sell high on him as from what I’ve seen from him he’s gonna be a number 3 dman at best or Dermott at worse.

Now you trade a 2023 1st, Mikheyev and Neimela and get Hagel it’s a win for everyone.


id say topi will be playing in 2, with a shorter stint in the NHL, most played in the AHL
Feb. 17, 2022 at 11:28 p.m.
#24
TopDawgReese
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 253
Quoting: odyssey
id say topi will be playing in 2, with a shorter stint in the NHL, most played in the AHL


Yea but still if it is 2 seasons he’s at best a no. 3 dman. Liljegren is gonna be better in the long run cause of Liljegren defensive skill and his puck movement.
Feb. 18, 2022 at 10:59 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
so again, you have no idea what value that actually is and no information that the leafs have offered them anything like above. Or are you on the inside and know what was offered for sure?


We have a good idea of what Hagel is worth; nobody cares whether the Leafs have offered a similar package or not (this AGM is a similar package), point blank Hagel isn't getting moved for a 1st and decent prospect so this doesn't work and yes, Hagel is worth more then that because the Hawks have the luxury to set the market on him. End of story
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll