Picks from 2017 still available
5th (NYI) - Noah Ganske
6th (WIN) - Emil Westerlund
7th (TOR) - Linus Nyman
7th (VGK) - Drake Rymsha
Will NOT be listening to any offers on: Eichel, Stamkos, Kane.
Untouchables: Marner, Gaudreau, Ristolainen, Reinhart and Murray
Basically untouchable are: Steel, Murray, Suter, Nurse, Dahlen, Zetterberg, McNiven, Gauthier, Aston-Reese, Vilardi, Lehkonen, Bear, and Skjei. Untouchables are players I don't see myself moving, but I am always open for trade offer on any player.
Hard to get players include: Poink, Vatrano, and Ullmark.
If a good deal came along:?
------------------------------
PLAYER'S RIGHTS I HAVE ACQUIRED!
Ryan Miller
Brian Gionta
Reid McNeill
Brendan Smith
Jaromir Jagr
---------------------------
Signed Players: $51,188,396
Retained Salaries: $7,350,000
Buyouts: $3,333,333
Bonus Overage: N/A
Total Cap Hit: $62,796,729
Remaining Cap: $13,203,271
UFA Budget: $20,803,271
Discrepancies: Eddie Lack IRL retention of $1,375,000.
I tell you what, If you go through your other armchair and find the quote where you say I told you Vatrano+ for Rask, which I don't remember, but it coulda happened like a week ago, I'll give you the trade.
Sure you do, but it never happened and you're just doing this because you like F50Marco or whatever. What happened in that thread is irrelevant and I thought he was wrong, don't hold that against me, I want whats best for this league.
This has nothing to with anyone except you and me, the comment is on my old thread, comment number 505, guess what, you made the comment.
I don't care if things have changed due to acqiring new players or expansion issues, what this is about is you telling me that Vatrano is now worth more than Rask is and it has nothing to do with the fact that Vatrano is expansion exempt.
Then you throw BreKel under the bus for something you know and I know he didn't do, the name calling is repetitive and undeserving in almost all cases, you are the most immature GM in the game, and when I say immature, it's not name calling, it's the truth plain and simple, I think you are on thin ice with a lot of GM's, Carolina's ice just happened to crack now.
Sure you do, but it never happened and you're just doing this because you like F50Marco or whatever. What happened in that thread is irrelevant and I thought he was wrong, don't hold that against me, I want whats best for this league.
This has nothing to with anyone except you and me, the comment is on my old thread, comment number 505, guess what, you made the comment.
I don't care if things have changed due to acqiring new players or expansion issues, what this is about is you telling me that Vatrano is now worth more than Rask is and it has nothing to do with the fact that Vatrano is expansion exempt.
Then you throw BreKel under the bus for something you know and I know he didn't do, the name calling is repetitive and undeserving in almost all cases, you are the most immature GM in the game, and when I say immature, it's not name calling, it's the truth plain and simple, I think you are on thin ice with a lot of GM's, Carolina's ice just happened to crack now.
I didn't throw BreKel under the bus. How is saying he might have said it throwing him under the bus. Drama man, you're all about it. Great work with this.. So if i get this right, if i say something long ago, and then things change, it's not fair of me to change the deal? Your logic is flawless and you're totally understanding me when I said Vatrano > Rask because Rask isn't expansion exempt so we lose him, when we could just keep Vatrano.
Sure you do, but it never happened and you're just doing this because you like F50Marco or whatever. What happened in that thread is irrelevant and I thought he was wrong, don't hold that against me, I want whats best for this league.
This has nothing to with anyone except you and me, the comment is on my old thread, comment number 505, guess what, you made the comment.
I don't care if things have changed due to acqiring new players or expansion issues, what this is about is you telling me that Vatrano is now worth more than Rask is and it has nothing to do with the fact that Vatrano is expansion exempt.
Then you throw BreKel under the bus for something you know and I know he didn't do, the name calling is repetitive and undeserving in almost all cases, you are the most immature GM in the game, and when I say immature, it's not name calling, it's the truth plain and simple, I think you are on thin ice with a lot of GM's, Carolina's ice just happened to crack now.
I really wish you would reconsider what you're doing. I don't think it's fair and even if you want to trade Rask for Vatrano straight up, I mean if you need that trade to feel good, we'll do it, or I can add slightly if that mends the fences with you, but I never said I was going to give you Vatrano + a huge amount for Rask, unless it was way before we got Nelson, who changed our game plan.
This has nothing to with anyone except you and me, the comment is on my old thread, comment number 505, guess what, you made the comment.
I don't care if things have changed due to acqiring new players or expansion issues, what this is about is you telling me that Vatrano is now worth more than Rask is and it has nothing to do with the fact that Vatrano is expansion exempt.
Then you throw BreKel under the bus for something you know and I know he didn't do, the name calling is repetitive and undeserving in almost all cases, you are the most immature GM in the game, and when I say immature, it's not name calling, it's the truth plain and simple, I think you are on thin ice with a lot of GM's, Carolina's ice just happened to crack now.
I didn't throw BreKel under the bus. How is saying he might have said it throwing him under the bus. Drama man, you're all about it. Great work with this.. So if i get this right, if i say something long ago, and then things change, it's not fair of me to change the deal? Your logic is flawless and you're totally understanding me when I said Vatrano > Rask because Rask isn't expansion exempt so we lose him, when we could just keep Vatrano.
You said if I can find the comment I could have that deal right?
I don't want that deal, because I'm not dealing with you anymore.
I think you are making drama when it wasn't even there between us in the first place. I said Vatrano > Rask because we lose Rask as the 8th forward. In real life Rask is way better. Holy crap it's not even close right now. Vatrano has a long way to go but I think he's gonna work hard and do it, but right now Rask has way more value, except we lose him for nothing. Is that gonna make you feel better if I trade you Vatrano and something good for Rask and then lose him for nothing?
I didn't throw BreKel under the bus. How is saying he might have said it throwing him under the bus. Drama man, you're all about it. Great work with this.. So if i get this right, if i say something long ago, and then things change, it's not fair of me to change the deal? Your logic is flawless and you're totally understanding me when I said Vatrano > Rask because Rask isn't expansion exempt so we lose him, when we could just keep Vatrano.
You said if I can find the comment I could have that deal right?
I don't want that deal, because I'm not dealing with you anymore.
Don't be like that man, I've done nothing to you and you're bringing up the past.
You said if I can find the comment I could have that deal right?
I don't want that deal, because I'm not dealing with you anymore.
Don't be like that man, I've done nothing to you and you're bringing up the past.
With or without the expansion draft you would still say Vatrano has more value than Rask, and maybe someday he will, but that is far from the case right now.
Don't be like that man, I've done nothing to you and you're bringing up the past.
With or without the expansion draft you would still say Vatrano has more value than Rask, and maybe someday he will, but that is far from the case right now.
Quoting: NobodyCares
Quoting: Zach
No, I'll check it now.
I think I could probably swing Spooner + Vatrano for Rask + Gauthier. I'd have to confirm it with my AGM. We lose 2 NHLers but Rask is the best current piece in the deal and our RW prospects aren't great after Senyshyn.
So I didn't say Rask is the best current piece? Well it's literally on my thread dude. Why are you doing this?
With or without the expansion draft you would still say Vatrano has more value than Rask, and maybe someday he will, but that is far from the case right now.
Quoting: NobodyCares
I think I could probably swing Spooner + Vatrano for Rask + Gauthier. I'd have to confirm it with my AGM. We lose 2 NHLers but Rask is the best current piece in the deal and our RW prospects aren't great after Senyshyn.
So I didn't say Rask is the best current piece? Well it's literally on my thread dude. Why are you doing this?
I'm doing this because I don't like you, I don't like the way you treat others who have done nothing to deserve it, and I don't like the way you act in general.
Don't be like that man, I've done nothing to you and you're bringing up the past.
With or without the expansion draft you would still say Vatrano has more value than Rask, and maybe someday he will, but that is far from the case right now.
With all this you literally burned the bridge from my side too. You threw a tantrum over nothing and tried to say things that weren't true. talking about a deal and then changing your mind is part of being a GM. If a deal is not accepted at the time, the GM can change it. You acted like a kid and now please don't come to my thread unless you're coming to apologize for what you've done so far. I apologize if I'm not going to trade an exempt player for your player who i lose in the expansion draft, I thought for sure we could come to a deal like we did earlier with Subban Miller and picks. That was a solid deal bro and we coulda had another with Spooner + Vatrano for Rask + something, but it's like your not just dumping on me your dumping on Spooner too. If I was spooner I'd be like bwahahaha I'm in the Nhl and you're not, good luck with your life while I'm making 2.5M a year with my current contract. You should have just taken them both and the problem was solved. We wanted Gauthier, but we could have also added a piece. You just tried to work me over and it's unacceptable man, I don't think I'll be able to forgive you for this.
With or without the expansion draft you would still say Vatrano has more value than Rask, and maybe someday he will, but that is far from the case right now.
With all this you literally burned the bridge from my side too. You threw a tantrum over nothing and tried to say things that weren't true. talking about a deal and then changing your mind is part of being a GM. If a deal is not accepted at the time, the GM can change it. You acted like a kid and now please don't come to my thread unless you're coming to apologize for what you've done so far. I apologize if I'm not going to trade an exempt player for your player who i lose in the expansion draft, I thought for sure we could come to a deal like we did earlier with Subban Miller and picks. That was a solid deal bro and we coulda had another with Spooner + Vatrano for Rask + something, but it's like your not just dumping on me your dumping on Spooner too. If I was spooner I'd be like bwahahaha I'm in the Nhl and you're not, good luck with your life while I'm making 2.5M a year with my current contract. You should have just taken them both and the problem was solved. We wanted Gauthier, but we could have also added a piece. You just tried to work me over and it's unacceptable man, I don't think I'll be able to forgive you for this.
Yeah, I'll go and apologize on your thread right now.......... Don't hold your breath, I have nothing against Spooner I think he is a good player, just not a player I want.
I don't mind if both sides of the bridge gets burned, the only players I have any interest on your team is Vatrano and McAvoy, and their are plenty of better options that are cheaper to acquire as well, so sorry, but I have nothing left to say to you except stop using my thread for this stuff.