SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another TDL idea

Created by: MauriceArthur15
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 19, 2022
Published: Feb. 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Stecher, Troy ($850,000 retained)
DET
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Kokkonen, Mikko [Reserve List]
  3. 2023 4th round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Hagel, Brandon
  2. 2022 6th round pick (CBJ)
CHI
  1. Hirvonen, Roni [Reserve List]
  2. Mikheyev, Ilya
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,488,116$0$400,000$11,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 19, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 204
Likes: 33
The Stecher move feels kind of lateral, I'd rather just save the assets and play Holl. Stecher may be better than Holl but is he so much better that he moves the needle?

I like the Hagel trade, Blackhawks would probably accept as well considering their asking price, maybe remove the 2nd and up the prospect quality like Abruzzese, Mikheyev, a 1st and a 3rd.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 1:08 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
TopDawgReese
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 253
Quoting: cnick19
The Stecher move feels kind of lateral, I'd rather just save the assets and play Holl. Stecher may be better than Holl but is he so much better that he moves the needle?

I like the Hagel trade, Blackhawks would probably accept as well considering their asking price, maybe remove the 2nd and up the prospect quality like Abruzzese, Mikheyev, a 1st and a 3rd.


I kinda don’t want to trade Abruzzese as he’s a year away from the league. Why trade him when he’s almost NHL ready.

As for Stecher he provides more puck mobility for Muzzin as he needs that. Holl can’t move the puck and teams are abusing Holl inability to move the puck
Feb. 19, 2022 at 1:21 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 553
Detroit says no thanks.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 1:29 p.m.
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,547
Likes: 22,689
I can't see Stecher as an improvement for the Leafs, but of course all other Dmen are so much more superior than Leaf Dmen. If anything the Leafs should use assets to acquire a position of need instead of acquiring a third line left winger, which is position of strength and depth for the Leafs.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 1:51 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 204
Likes: 33
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
I kinda don’t want to trade Abruzzese as he’s a year away from the league. Why trade him when he’s almost NHL ready.

As for Stecher he provides more puck mobility for Muzzin as he needs that. Holl can’t move the puck and teams are abusing Holl inability to move the puck


The puck moving aspect is a very good point, definitely would help that 2nd pair so I take back what I said about that.

Also, I agree with you about Abruzzese, I don't want to trade him either. However, Blackhawks might want a more "real" prospect for Hagel. It would come down to whether or not you think Abruzzese has a chance to provide similar value to Hagel in the next 2.5 years.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 2:27 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,688
Likes: 12,030
Or you could give us the 4th for Stecher.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 2:28 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: cnick19
The puck moving aspect is a very good point, definitely would help that 2nd pair so I take back what I said about that.

Also, I agree with you about Abruzzese, I don't want to trade him either. However, Blackhawks might want a more "real" prospect for Hagel. It would come down to whether or not you think Abruzzese has a chance to provide similar value to Hagel in the next 2.5 years.


Hawks have already been offered a 1st and decent prospect (B+ I interpret that as) for Hagel and declined. It's reported that a 1st and top prospect is a minimum for the hawks to agree to a trade. Hawks aren't shopping him, so any acquiring team will overpay. Likely Abruzzese, Robertson or Amirov, plus a 1st and maybe something extra.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 2:50 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
TopDawgReese
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 253
Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks have already been offered a 1st and decent prospect (B+ I interpret that as) for Hagel and declined. It's reported that a 1st and top prospect is a minimum for the hawks to agree to a trade. Hawks aren't shopping him, so any acquiring team will overpay. Likely Abruzzese, Robertson or Amirov, plus a 1st and maybe something extra.


Y’all got Hiroven (a top prospect), Ilya Mikheyev, 2023 1st and a 2022 2nd for Hagel. That a lot we given up as we have a roster player, a top prospect and 2 picks. That’s an overpayment for Hagel.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll