SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Back to the Leafs

Created by: Mdness94
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 27, 2022
Published: Feb. 27, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Vancouver fans.....

I love you bb girls I'm just throwing this trade out there because Miller isn't worth more than Eichel. This is fair and you can trade Kerfy if you want next season for a 2nd if you retain or hey, you get a good middle six forward right now.

Chicago fans...

Woof, you get Mrazek after Flower is gone

Seattle fans...

You get the guy you originally wanted! Congratulations! And you get a second and a couple of B/C prospects

Sharks fans...

You most likely are looking to trade Reimer and you get a good 3 goalie at this time who is signed for a few more years and can develop into a good backup for you, possibly more. Plus.... bring Optimus Reim home
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (CHI)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Giordano, Mark ($3,375,000 retained)
  2. Järnkrok, Calle
SEA
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Holmberg, Pontus
  3. Kokkonen, Mikko [Reserve List]
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
4.
SJS
  1. Abramov, Mikhail
  2. Woll, Joseph
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (CHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$74,694,783$0$0$6,805,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$0$0
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 27, 2022 at 7:36 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 157
Likes: 162
Nobody is paying for Mrazek
Feb. 27, 2022 at 7:42 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Mdness94
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 137
Likes: 9
Quoting: Panic76
Nobody is paying for Mrazek


A team that needs goaltending where they are in need of a historically good goalie would be a good idea to acquire him. Plus with all that's going on with them, I doubt many players are jumping to go to them lol
Feb. 27, 2022 at 7:47 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 2,867
Doesn’t get it done without upgrading the 3rd to a 2nd
Feb. 27, 2022 at 7:48 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
We dont need your scraps, just give us picks
Feb. 27, 2022 at 7:51 p.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 9,697
Quoting: Mdness94
A team that needs goaltending where they are in need of a historically good goalie would be a good idea to acquire him. Plus with all that's going on with them, I doubt many players are jumping to go to them lol


I'd prefer to go with MANY of the UFAs over Mrazek regardless of contract. But when you add it that $3.8M contract for a pure backup...MAYBE if you sent a 1st with him. Certainly not paying anything for him. That's ridiculous.
Beetlejuice, SociallyHawkward, ChiHawk and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 27, 2022 at 8:19 p.m.
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,435
Likes: 22,639
I wonder what the plan is for next season when 5.6m Muzzin returns, Reilly gets his 2.5m raise, and RFAs to be signed. Giordani is the only big 3.375m expiring contract.
Miller is such an impractical and really unnecessary addition.
Feb. 27, 2022 at 8:34 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Hawks pass, we don't need an overpaid backup goalie even if he was free
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 12:21 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Mdness94
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 137
Likes: 9
Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks pass, we don't need an overpaid backup goalie even if he was free


Quoting: exo2769
I'd prefer to go with MANY of the UFAs over Mrazek regardless of contract. But when you add it that $3.8M contract for a pure backup...MAYBE if you sent a 1st with him. Certainly not paying anything for him. That's ridiculous.


Guys, Mrazek is a career .910 save percentage and he has a history of being a good tandem goalie. 3.8 million is reasonable for a tandem goalie. Because he's not playing well now doesn't mean he doesn't have a track record of playing well. If you view the UFA market, it's slim pickings and teams are gonna pay top dollar for marginal goaltending. At least there is certainty here and again... going to the Hawks with all the crap going on AND they're bad? C'mon, no decent goaltender is gonna sign there. And they're probably gonna sell at the deadline so they're only gonna get worse.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 12:24 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Mdness94
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 137
Likes: 9
Quoting: palhal
I wonder what the plan is for next season when 5.6m Muzzin returns, Reilly gets his 2.5m raise, and RFAs to be signed. Giordani is the only big 3.375m expiring contract.
Miller is such an impractical and really unnecessary addition.


When you add a player of JT miller's calibre, it's never an unnecessary addition. Plus if one of the big guys goes down, they need another stud. I think he's a 1st liner in the NHL and the extra year is great as well. They can fit everyone next year. RFA's of note are really Kase, Engvall and Sandin and none of them should cost too much. Goaltending is probably the biggest question mark.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 12:39 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: Mdness94
Guys, Mrazek is a career .910 save percentage and he has a history of being a good tandem goalie. 3.8 million is reasonable for a tandem goalie. Because he's not playing well now doesn't mean he doesn't have a track record of playing well. If you view the UFA market, it's slim pickings and teams are gonna pay top dollar for marginal goaltending. At least there is certainty here and again... going to the Hawks with all the crap going on AND they're bad? C'mon, no decent goaltender is gonna sign there. And they're probably gonna sell at the deadline so they're only gonna get worse.


He played in Carolina behind one of the, if not the, best defense in the league. He's not good. Carolina fans wanted him traded when he was there for good reason. He's a slight above average backup goalie but overpaid to be a backup. What you are seeing in Mrazek now, is who he is...Carolina's D inflated his stats.
Nqutilus liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 10:20 a.m.
#11
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 9,697
Quoting: Mdness94
Guys, Mrazek is a career .910 save percentage and he has a history of being a good tandem goalie. 3.8 million is reasonable for a tandem goalie. Because he's not playing well now doesn't mean he doesn't have a track record of playing well. If you view the UFA market, it's slim pickings and teams are gonna pay top dollar for marginal goaltending. At least there is certainty here and again... going to the Hawks with all the crap going on AND they're bad? C'mon, no decent goaltender is gonna sign there. And they're probably gonna sell at the deadline so they're only gonna get worse.


I simply don't agree with your view of his track record. I do watch the Canes play. I even said the DAY he was signed that Leafs fans would regret it. Link below for evidence. I was wrong about Jack Campbell, but I'm ok with what I said because he really didn't have that long of a track record and he's proving himself now. NOW JACK is the guy I can accept your premise of simply not playing well right now. He's had a few rough games, but that's because he's being over worked. The Leafs need a reliable 1B tandem...which they don't have. The real issue with Mrazek is that he's been consistently inconsistent for 5 years now. Playing behind the league's best defense has definitely padded his career stats. BUT if you're a Leafs fan then look at the bright side. Next year he'll be just as inconsistent, but he'll likely have more good games than bad...because that's who he's been for years. You literally never know who's going to show up on any given night.

You want a goalie that can win you a game if you need it. The last thing you want is a goalie that you have to worry about him losing the game for you. Being consistently inconsistent creates that worry. Tell me the truth here...when you hear Mrazek is starting in net...are you happy or are you worried?

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/495384/2
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll