Miller will get more than that in a trade. Won't be able to afford him next year anyways, as much as I want him on the Wild

No way that Bruins deal happens and you're selling low on Miller. Everything else is at least close although I don't think they should trade Garland.

There ain't no way Halak is worth a 3rd round pick

Nope, Carlo for Horvat 1 for 1 is close to fair value but still won't get done

Here before GophersBenJ says you can't have a 1st much less Khusnutdinov for Miller.

Ya he will get 2 1sts

This is such an easy no from Minnesota. You know besides the fact oir gm no longer has any interest in ht Miller. Every Miller proposal = he's worth same or more than eichel who has 4 years left.

fair enough

I'd do that but it depends how bad boston decides they want a 2c

clockwork.

WSH declines, no cap space for Pearson, and I wouldn't want him anyway since I don't see him as an upgrade to guys like Sheary or Sprong.

fair enough. am I overrating beckman?

Our gm no matter what Canucks fans are thinking isn't trading top prospects for a player whose a free agent after next year. Plus the fact, our cap and our gm no longer having any interest

I just don't see Boston willing to create one "semi" hole (#2C, which Haula has done well between Hall & Pastrnak) to create a bigger hole (and hard to fill) Top 4 RHD. I also don't think Foligno would waive his NMC to go to Vancouver

Except this proposal isn't anywhere close to what Eichel got so what are you on about?

Perhaps. I think his ceiling is a middle 6 winger, I see him as a 20 goal/40-50 point guy if he reaches his ceiling. Khusnutdinov about the same. If I'm Vancouver, I'm asking for at least a 1st round pick, A prospect (only one we could afford to give up, in my opinion, is Lambos since we definitely aren't giving up Rossi, Boldy, nor Wallstedt), and maybe one of Khusnutdinov/Beckman. Might need to throw in a 2nd in there too. I probably wouldn't do that without the 2nd if I'm Guerin, and I also wouldn't do that if I'm Vancouver since they need a RD badly and don't really need winger prospects, but value-wise that feels close to ballpark. Modeled that roughly after the Duchene trade to Ottawa

So basically:

1st, 2nd, Lambos, and Beckman/Khusnutdinov for Miller.

For reference, Duchene trade was a 1st, 2nd of the following year, 3rd, Girard, Kamenev, Bowers, and Hammond for Duchene (who had a $6M cap at the time with an additional year on his deal)

Edit: and again, I wouldn't do that if I'm Guerin because I don't think Miller puts us over the edge, but the 3-way Duchene trade to Ottawa is a pretty damn close comparable for a Miller trade

Only way if I were MIN that I would consider this is if Van retained half, could potentially figure something out since there will be $5+M off the books next year in either Fiala or Dumba going, so you make a cup run this year (or at least attempt to), and then if the team isn't in a great spot next year, move on from Miller at TDL, but still not super wise imo to do something like that.