Quoting: Caniac2000
To say he's hurt all the time and only highlights the last 2 years seems a little like an oxymoron. He spent the majority of his time in Raleigh healthy. He would have started more last year if it wasn't a condensed season. You can't blame him for being run into and breaking his thumb in Raleigh. I don't know how he sustained the injury in Toronto, but the injuries aren't something a player controls. If you want to point to a goalie with injury issues consistently, Raanta is the prime example.
You go back to 16-17, where he was on garbage Detroit teams and on a shoddy Flyers roster. There's a balance for how far back is ideal, and normally that's around 3 years. I get you might want the extra time because they've been shortened years and he's sustained injuries, but... are you better at your job now than you were 5 years ago? A lot changes when it's been that long
True, I went back that far because it was the last year he was a full-time starter in Detroit and it gets you ~200 games to draw data from. If you want to look at the last 3 years, it's pretty similar (.904, 2.70, -7.9 GSAA in 67 games, including his 12 game heater last year.)
Raanta is actually a fairly good name to bring up as a comparison, too - he's actually played almost as many games in the past 3 seasons as Mrazek (61 vs. 67) despite his "[consistent] injury issues". He's actually got comparable/better numbers than what Mrazek has put up - .915, 2.79, 11.9 GSAA, with that GAA getting a little skewed playing behind a pretty bad Arizona team last year. He's also only getting paid $2M this year and next, while Mrazek's cap hit is nearly double that for 2 more seasons after this.
None of this is necessarily saying Mrazek is a terrible goalie or anything like that, just that he's being paid like a starter while not really playing up to that level, and that should be reflected in his trade value.