SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

At LEAST do THIS

Created by: HollywoodHudon
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2022
Published: Mar. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ARI
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
VAN
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Mrázek, Petr
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
  5. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André ($3,500,000 retained)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
  3. 2022 6th round pick (CBJ)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (TBL)
CHI
  1. Halák, Jaroslav
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$77,994,783$0$0$3,505,217

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$0$0
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.
#1
HaydenPastorius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
God if this was the leafs playoff roster in the playoffs, I'd honestly be in love.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:42 p.m.
#2
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
That canucks trade is garbage. The Leafs are trading the better defenceman, the better goalie, a good depth forward who happens to be great defensively and 2 picks for a more expensive Kerfoot, (who has more term and makes 1.5 more than Kerfoot does.). What a garbage trade.
palhal liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:43 p.m.
#3
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: HaydenPastorius
God if this was the leafs playoff roster in the playoffs, I'd honestly be in love.


Does anyone even look into anything before commenting? Schenn is a 7/8 defenceman. Halak has been not good this season and Garland is a 5 million dollar Kerfoot who scores less points and isn't as good on the PK and can't play centre.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:45 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
That canucks trade is garbage. The Leafs are trading the better defenceman, the better goalie, a good depth forward who happens to be great defensively and 2 picks for a more expensive Kerfoot, (who has more term and makes 1.5 more than Kerfoot does.). What a garbage trade.


It’s a garbage trade for the Canucks. Schenn and Holl are similar, Schenn arguably better and makes league minimum. Mrazek is a cap dump that would cost you a 1st to give the Canucks. So you don’t get a good winger with a good contract for a bottom 6 winger and a late 2nd
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:49 p.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,065
Likes: 22,463
"AT LEAST DO THIS". What? And make a non cap compliant cap team this year and next as well as trading away necessary futures?
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:50 p.m.
#6
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
It’s a garbage trade for the Canucks. Schenn and Holl are similar, Schenn arguably better and makes league minimum. Mrazek is a cap dump that would cost you a 1st to give the Canucks. So you don’t get a good winger with a good contract for a bottom 6 winger and a late 2nd


Garland is not a good contract. Hes basically a less versatile Kerfoot making 1.5 more and contributes less. Mrazek is going to get a lot of starts here while Campbell recovers from a rib injury. Holl plays 20 minutes a night on a playoff team while Schenn plays 16 minutes a night. They are not the same. Schenn is a 7/8 defenceman.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:57 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Garland is not a good contract. Hes basically a less versatile Kerfoot making 1.5 more and contributes less. Mrazek is going to get a lot of starts here while Campbell recovers from a rib injury. Holl plays 20 minutes a night on a playoff team while Schenn plays 16 minutes a night. They are not the same. Schenn is a 7/8 defenceman.


Garland is a good contract. He is a better player than Kerfoot and contributes at both ends of the ice. Kerfoot has more points because he plays with Tavares and Nylander. Mrazek has been awful this year and has an awful contract. He is a cap dump. Holl may be getting that ice time but Leafs fans have been complaining non stop about him. Schenn has played really well with Hughes and is signed for the league minimum next year. I’d rather keep him
Mar. 10, 2022 at 12:58 p.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,065
Likes: 22,463
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Garland is not a good contract. Hes basically a less versatile Kerfoot making 1.5 more and contributes less. Mrazek is going to get a lot of starts here while Campbell recovers from a rib injury. Holl plays 20 minutes a night on a playoff team while Schenn plays 16 minutes a night. They are not the same. Schenn is a 7/8 defenceman.


Just to add. Garland is on pace for about 51 point season. Engvall about 32 point season. Is Garland worth the 3.6m difference in cap (which the Leafs can't afford) and all those futures. Leafs shouldn't be wasting cap on positions that have depth....LW and LD. Even Chychrun isn't as needed as maybe some other postion.
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 1:05 p.m.
#9
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
Garland is a good contract. He is a better player than Kerfoot and contributes at both ends of the ice. Kerfoot has more points because he plays with Tavares and Nylander. Mrazek has been awful this year and has an awful contract. He is a cap dump. Holl may be getting that ice time but Leafs fans have been complaining non stop about him. Schenn has played really well with Hughes and is signed for the league minimum next year. I’d rather keep him


Keep all your assest. Mrazek has a winning record, Halak is 2-6-2. Garland is not better than Kerfoot. He's the same and offers nothing more than Kerfoot. Garland got points playing with Miller and Boeser and not much away from them. Garland is a bad contract.
palhal liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 1:24 p.m.
#10
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Keep all your assest. Mrazek has a winning record, Halak is 2-6-2. Garland is not better than Kerfoot. He's the same and offers nothing more than Kerfoot. Garland got points playing with Miller and Boeser and not much away from them. Garland is a bad contract.


It's probably not the biggest thing here, but referencing a goaltenders win/loss record to is a bogey, dude. Some of you may remember the goaltender who, for a time, held the single season wins record for the Leafs. He also posted an .894 sv%, a -22.0 GSAA, on a team that scored the 6th most goals in the NHL. Seems eerily similar to the past couple of months...
dannibalcorpse liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 2:15 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Keep all your assest. Mrazek has a winning record, Halak is 2-6-2. Garland is not better than Kerfoot. He's the same and offers nothing more than Kerfoot. Garland got points playing with Miller and Boeser and not much away from them. Garland is a bad contract.


So is Mrazek better than Hellebuyck because he has a winning record but Hellebuyck doesn’t? Using a goalies win/loss to determine how good they are is an idiotic argument. Mrazek sucks and is a cap dump

https://twitter.com/jfreshhockey/status/1500605869993697283?s=21 And as you can see, Garland is a great player with a good contract. Much better than Kerfoot. If Garland had been playing with Tavares and Nylander all year like Kerfoot has he’d be close to a PPG
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:05 p.m.
#12
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Lenny7
It's probably not the biggest thing here, but referencing a goaltenders win/loss record to is a bogey, dude. Some of you may remember the goaltender who, for a time, held the single season wins record for the Leafs. He also posted an .894 sv%, a -22.0 GSAA, on a team that scored the 6th most goals in the NHL. Seems eerily similar to the past couple of months...


Mrazek has his warts but he's battled hard and has made some big saves when needed. I was worried for a bit but I am not too worried about the goaltending. Regardless of all that. Halak is old and not good anymore. Mrazek is better and hasn't even played to normal level
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:10 p.m.
#13
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
So is Mrazek better than Hellebuyck because he has a winning record but Hellebuyck doesn’t? Using a goalies win/loss to determine how good they are is an idiotic argument. Mrazek sucks and is a cap dump

https://twitter.com/jfreshhockey/status/1500605869993697283?s=21 And as you can see, Garland is a great player with a good contract. Much better than Kerfoot. If Garland had been playing with Tavares and Nylander all year like Kerfoot has he’d be close to a PPG


Why isn't he doing that in Vancouver then? Garland is a depth forward and paying a player because better players pad his stats is about as bad as one can get at cap management.

As for Mrazek, I am not calling him an all-star but Halak has been bad this year. He's done. Mrazek for all his warts still earns the W's. I would rather keep Mrazek for the season and playoffs then move him in the offseason. No matter how you slice it, this is an awful trade for TO. Zero improvement, more long term cap and it costs us futures. Terrible
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:20 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Why isn't he doing that in Vancouver then? Garland is a depth forward and paying a player because better players pad his stats is about as bad as one can get at cap management.

As for Mrazek, I am not calling him an all-star but Halak has been bad this year. He's done. Mrazek for all his warts still earns the W's. I would rather keep Mrazek for the season and playoffs then move him in the offseason. No matter how you slice it, this is an awful trade for TO. Zero improvement, more long term cap and it costs us futures. Terrible


Mrazek earns W’s because he’s on a much better team. The Leafs win in spite of him. No matter how you slice it, this is an awful trade for Vancouver. Downgrade significantly at F, take on more cap for no upgrade on defense, and take on a cap dump backup goalie who’s no better than Halak, just for a late 1st and 2nd
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:22 p.m.
#15
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
Mrazek earns W’s because he’s on a much better team. The Leafs win in spite of him. No matter how you slice it, this is an awful trade for Vancouver. Downgrade significantly at F, take on more cap for no upgrade on defense, and take on a cap dump backup goalie who’s no better than Halak, just for a late 1st and 2nd


Halak sucks, schenn is the 7/8th defenceman in TO. Engvall is not 3.5 million less than Garland and then we lose a 1st and a 2nd. No thanks. Enjoy losing Boeser because your cap sucks
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:25 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Halak sucks, schenn is the 7/8th defenceman in TO. Engvall is not 3.5 million less than Garland and then we lose a 1st and a 2nd. No thanks. Enjoy losing Boeser because your cap sucks


Mrazek sucks and has a far worse contract, Schenn is just as good as Holl and cheaper, Garland is a top 6 forward while Engvall is a 4th liner. Enjoy losing Matthews in a couple years because you can’t win a playoff series and overpaid Tavares and Marner
Mar. 10, 2022 at 3:37 p.m.
#17
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,961
Likes: 5,094
biggest question that maybe some Canucks fans can answer: why would I be be sending out my second line RW who drives possession and is a power play contributor, and also my RD2 who's signed this year & next for basically the league minimum, when I'm only a few points out of a playoff spot? Like, am I being crazy or is Vancouver clearly not a deadline seller? (especially not for this grab bag of downgrades)
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:29 p.m.
#18
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
Mrazek sucks and has a far worse contract, Schenn is just as good as Holl and cheaper, Garland is a top 6 forward while Engvall is a 4th liner. Enjoy losing Matthews in a couple years because you can’t win a playoff series and overpaid Tavares and Marner


Ah yes this nonsense. Top end players making big money is somehow bad but paying middle 6 depth forwards 5 million is good because it's less than Marner makes. There is a reason TO is going to make the playoffs and Vancouver likely not. It's not because Mrazek sucks or because Matthews Marner and JT make a lot. It's because TO has good value from all their players while Benning was bad at handing out too much money for depth guys. Myers is a #6 defenceman making 6 million. Garland is a middle 6 winger making 5 million.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 8:24 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
biggest question that maybe some Canucks fans can answer: why would I be be sending out my second line RW who drives possession and is a power play contributor, and also my RD2 who's signed this year & next for basically the league minimum, when I'm only a few points out of a playoff spot? Like, am I being crazy or is Vancouver clearly not a deadline seller? (especially not for this grab bag of downgrades)


I could see one of Boeser or Garland getting moved at the deadline, but only if it brings in a legit top 4 RHD. If not then they likely keep them for a playoff push
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll