SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cost to Aquire

Created by: wheeler5
Team: 2021-22 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2022
Published: Mar. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Curious on what fans would think these players would cost to aquire. Targeted players that wouldnt cripple the team they were moved from.
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Turcotte, Alex
Additional Details:
Seems buried as a center in the kings system.
LAK
2.
MTL
  1. Morrow, Scott [Reserve List]
Additional Details:
Similiar, doesnt seem thered be a big role if they decide to keep Deangelo
CAR
3.
MTL
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
Additional Details:
Same, buried behind the rangers Rd in system.
NYR
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$81,500,000$74,761,225$597,561$3,875,000$6,738,775
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$917,831$917,831
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
C
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$761,250$761,250
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:45 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
https://twitter.com/NathanPStrauss/status/1468257129018494979?s=20&t=AUZ6u3bq3C-6yFEKvVknVg

Unless it's a package for someone like Caufield or Suzuki, he's untouchable
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:46 p.m.
#2
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
We would want a better player that addresses one of our needs. And if not, we can always play him at LD.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:48 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,942
Likes: 6,649
Quoting: Caniac2000
https://twitter.com/NathanPStrauss/status/1468257129018494979?s=20&t=AUZ6u3bq3C-6yFEKvVknVg

Unless it's a package for someone like Caufield or Suzuki, he's untouchable


LMAO I knew this comment was coming! You can't be serious! Caufield or Suzuki! Come on that is like me saying to acquire Guhle you need to give us Aho or Svechnikov
FiveForFighting liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:48 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,763
Likes: 4,694
Kings are still very high on him, maybe the Kings would be interested in Romanov or Caufield, plus more.

Unlikely the Kings make a trade with Montreal on this, Turcotte is likely to be the primary piece used to get Chychrun.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:49 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Campabee
LMAO I knew this comment was coming! You can't be serious! Caufield or Suzuki! Come on that is like me saying to acquire Guhle you need to give us Aho or Svechnikov


Except Morrow >>>>> Guhle, and Suzuki and Caufield <<<< Aho and Svechnikov
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:51 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,942
Likes: 6,649
Quoting: Caniac2000
Except Morrow >>>>> Guhle, and Suzuki and Caufield <<<< Aho and Svechnikov


Morrow is not better than Guhle, I know you like to troll the Habs but even you can see they are the same value.

As for Aho and Svechnikov I used them because that is the same value Caufield and Suzuki have to Montreal. In other words they are untouchable.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:51 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Los Angeles' primary needs are at RW and LD, so the prototypical players we'd be looking for are Cole Caufield or Kaiden Guhle. But I can't tell you what the three players' respective trade values are. Moreover, I have the feeling that we won't be trading Turcotte unless it's in a package for an established young #1LD like Chychrun or Provorov or Sergachev or Werenski, and I don't think that any of them are reasonably within reach, anyway.

Reading over this comment, I guess I'm not much help to you, am I?
Mar. 10, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Campabee
Morrow is not better than Guhle, I know you like to troll the Habs but even you can see they are the same value.


Morrow is probably the best D prospect not in the NHL right now. That's got nothing to do with the habs. He's BRILLIANT. Watch some more UMass games.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:01 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,942
Likes: 6,649
Quoting: Caniac2000
Morrow is probably the best D prospect not in the NHL right now. That's got nothing to do with the habs. He's BRILLIANT. Watch some more UMass games.


That is just your opinion, look at the stats my friend. Morrow is good I will give him his dues but that doesn't make him better than Guhle. Morrow has 31 points in 33 games for UMASS Guhle has 39 points in 40 games. Both are sound defensive players both have good size and skating abilities. This is like when Av's fans were comparing Byram to Romanov, the difference in one to the other is so miniscule that it is not worth comparing.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:17 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Campabee
That is just your opinion, look at the stats my friend. Morrow is good I will give him his dues but that doesn't make him better than Guhle. Morrow has 31 points in 33 games for UMASS Guhle has 39 points in 40 games. Both are sound defensive players both have good size and skating abilities. This is like when Av's fans were comparing Byram to Romanov, the difference in one to the other is so miniscule that it is not worth comparing.


1) Byram is MILES better than Romanov.

2) Morrow is streets better than Guhle

Morrow is used as a shutdown defenseman at UMass and he's still scoring at that rate. I'd also like to point out that defensemen are used to STOP teams scoring. Morrow is the more gifted skater, he's got far better hands, and he's smarter with what he does. Guhle is very, very good. But I'd rather have Morrow.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:30 p.m.
#11
New York Rangers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 524
Nils can always play LD, while it would be a bit strange for him in the beginning I feel that a Lundkvist - Schneider duo could be DEADLY
delneggs liked this.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:37 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,942
Likes: 6,649
Quoting: Caniac2000
1) Byram is MILES better than Romanov.

2) Morrow is streets better than Guhle

Morrow is used as a shutdown defenseman at UMass and he's still scoring at that rate. I'd also like to point out that defensemen are used to STOP teams scoring. Morrow is the more gifted skater, he's got far better hands, and he's smarter with what he does. Guhle is very, very good. But I'd rather have Morrow.


Byram is not miles better than Romanov LMAO. Byram is not even an NHL regular yet and is concussion prone, Romanov is already a top 4 D man in his second full season. Byram (when healthy) and Romanovare really close in skill level. Everything you have said about Morrow directly translates to Guhle. He is also primarily being used as a shutdown D on one of the top teams in his league and is putting up those kinds of numbers as well. Come on now your bias is clearly showing try looking at them objectively without your Canes coloured glasses on.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:38 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Just because Lundqvist is stuck behind Schneider, doesn't mean he isn't still a top prospect or diminish his trade value. Plus, there is a possibility he or Schneider can move to LD and then be a pair. Rangers are not going to give him away cheap.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 5:59 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Campabee
Byram is not miles better than Romanov LMAO. Byram is not even an NHL regular yet and is concussion prone, Romanov is already a top 4 D man in his second full season. Byram (when healthy) and Romanovare really close in skill level. Everything you have said about Morrow directly translates to Guhle. He is also primarily being used as a shutdown D on one of the top teams in his league and is putting up those kinds of numbers as well. Come on now your bias is clearly showing try looking at them objectively without your Canes coloured glasses on.


When Byram is healthy, he's better offensively than Romanov, he's better defensively than Romanov, he's better in transition than Romanov, he plays all situations... I don't see why you think Romanov is better?

The difference between Morrow and Guhle is that Guhle is 20. Morrow is 18. Morrow's developing at the same rate Cale Makar did at UMass. Guhle is great. Morrow's better.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 2,283
Quoting: Campabee
Byram is not miles better than Romanov LMAO. Byram is not even an NHL regular yet and is concussion prone, Romanov is already a top 4 D man in his second full season. Byram (when healthy) and Romanovare really close in skill level. Everything you have said about Morrow directly translates to Guhle. He is also primarily being used as a shutdown D on one of the top teams in his league and is putting up those kinds of numbers as well. Come on now your bias is clearly showing try looking at them objectively without your Canes coloured glasses on.


As an unbiased observer who is not a fan of Colorado, Carolina or Montreal, you're wearing just as biased shades when it comes to that Romanov/Byram comparison. Byram, when healthy, is clearly superior to Romanov. He isn't an NHL regular yet because Colorado as a team is miles ahead of Montreal as a team. As such, the Avs have a significantly harder D-corp to become an NHL regular in. Of course the concussion issues cloud things, but in the fantasy world of always healthy players, I take Byram every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
Mar. 10, 2022 at 7:57 p.m.
#16
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 980
Yeah you aren’t gonna wanna give up what you would need to to get Lundkvist. Think of how MTL views Romanov and then say what would you trade him for.
Mar. 11, 2022 at 12:23 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 844
Likes: 199
Quoting: Caniac2000
Morrow is probably the best D prospect not in the NHL right now. That's got nothing to do with the habs. He's BRILLIANT. Watch some more UMass games.


Ever heard of Owen Power?
phillyjabroni liked this.
Mar. 11, 2022 at 12:29 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: FiveForFighting
Ever heard of Owen Power?


Yup, he was included in that.
Mar. 11, 2022 at 8:42 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 844
Likes: 199
Quoting: Caniac2000
Yup, he was included in that.


What about Jake Sanderson, Cam York, Luke Hughes, Clarke? Point is Morrow is good but not the best D outside the NHL
Mar. 11, 2022 at 8:43 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: FiveForFighting
What about Jake Sanderson, Cam York, Luke Hughes, Clarke? Point is Morrow is good but not the best D outside the NHL


Again, have him better than all of those. Again, best defenseman outside the NHL right now... from an analytical perspective it's borderline undeniable. The only one you can even make the case for is Power. And the underlying numbers don't favor the Wolverine.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll