SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade values

Created by: bliker
Team: 2021-22 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 15, 2022
Published: Mar. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
3.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Termination Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2023
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$84,388,796$0$5,052,500-$2,888,796
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$62,500$62K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$725,000$725,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$800,000$800,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$858,333$858,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$771,750$771,750
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,700,000$2,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:13 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,133
Likes: 14,147
Get outta here on dahlin
homiedaclown and sabres89 liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:13 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Dahlin is basically untouchable
sabres89 liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 491
Likes: 157
Edited Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:20 p.m.
Stanley- most have him at a 2nd and maybe middle prospect. Some fans are not ready to give up on him yet.

Hagel- think Coleman/Goodrow type here is the rumor, so 1st and prospect

Dahlin- Untouchable (I don’t like this term), every single player is tradable. So with that, I would personally go with “ Going to take a MASSIVE overpayment”

As far as actual mock trades from LAK, I’m not sure as I don’t know these teams exact needs/wants so not going to touch that

WIn- idk if they even know what they are doing

CHI- probably young players 20yo range for their rebuild

BUF- would assume about the same as CHI with possibly little older range being acceptable 25yo and under I would think
MisstheWhalers and bliker liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,186
Likes: 4,797
more than you want to pay
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:31 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,125
Likes: 6,134
If you are looking for young d from buffalo, the names that are probably on the table are Bryson, johnson, laaksonen, and maybe jokiharju (although if it's jokiharju an equal or better right d would have to be coming back). Don't see any interest in trading samuelsson- he's a big, young, physical defensive d, exactly what we don't have any of, so again, it would have to be a right handed d, defensively aware, and probably as good or better than Samuelsson. Power and dahlin aren't available, if somebody makes some ridiculous offer, sure, but usually these things go like this- "we want your young budding star, here's some spare parts", and the response is "well we would require several of your budding young stars in return". So I guess the answer is, more than you'd want to spend.
bliker liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 6,514
Start's with Byfield and then you can add Bjornfort, Clarke, and Kaliyev. That might get the Sabres to bite. But I seriously doubt they would bite at Byfield + Clarke.
RavensShadow liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:32 p.m.
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,556
Likes: 12,310
Stanley doesn't really have much value, like a 2nd at most but the Jets have invested a lot into him so its doubtful that they want to trade him, he's still a work in progress, he just got a pretty sweet goal against Vegas so he might be entering untouchable status.. haha 😆.. jk jk
njlaforte and bliker liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 9:32 p.m.
#8
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,786
Likes: 5,746
For Hagel I’ll take Turcotte and your first.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 10:39 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 1,923
Buffalo isnt trading dahlin
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 139
Likes: 47
hagel would prob be a turcotte plus a first type package
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:37 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 618
my guess for Dahlin is Byfield, Clark, 2022 1st -I think that's the Ballpark give or take - I guess it depends on what people think about Byfield, most still think he's going to be a top ten 1C but you see people question that now.
RavensShadow liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 7:39 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 309
Likes: 81
Quoting: Snowball
Stanley- most have him at a 2nd and maybe middle prospect. Some fans are not ready to give up on him yet.

Hagel- think Coleman/Goodrow type here is the rumor, so 1st and prospect

Dahlin- Untouchable (I don’t like this term), every single player is tradable. So with that, I would personally go with “ Going to take a MASSIVE overpayment”

As far as actual mock trades from LAK, I’m not sure as I don’t know these teams exact needs/wants so not going to touch that

WIn- idk if they even know what they are doing

CHI- probably young players 20yo range for their rebuild

BUF- would assume about the same as CHI with possibly little older range being acceptable 25yo and under I would think


This seems to be the most reasonable response here lol. From what I understand most GMs think Coleman was an overpay bc he was going to a contender and would get less from other teams so would that comparison also shift?
Also, I think the "massive overpayment" comment is an understatement considering how offended all the Sabres fans got about that question lmao
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll