SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Curious to hear from Leaf fans

Created by: Salzy
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 17, 2022
Published: Mar. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ANA
    Topi Niemela
    Timothy Liljegren
    Nicholas Robertson
    Rasmus Sandin (I assume he's #1 on this list)
    Matthew Knies
    TOR
      Just curious how you would rank the following prospects/Young players So I can mock a more realistic Lindholm deal
      2.
      ANA
      1. Niemelä, Topi [Reserve List]
      2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
      3. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
      TOR
      1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
      2. Lindholm, Hampus ($2,602,778 retained)
      Additional Details:
      Would the Ducks need to take cap back?
      3.
      ANA
      TOR
        Reminder this is more of a knowledge gathering ACGM than a true mock trade
        Buyouts
        Retained Salary Transactions
        Buried
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2022
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the NSH
        2023
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the COL
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        2024
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        20$81,500,000$60,412,083$0$3,282,500$21,087,917
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $2,037,500$2,037,500
        LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,456,250$1,456,250
        LW, C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $2,463,139$2,463,139
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,700,000$1,700,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        LW, C
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,450,000$1,450,000
        RW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
        C, LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $874,125$874,125
        C, LW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        C, LW
        UFA - 2
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,500,000$6,500,000
        LD/RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 5
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $3,900,000$3,900,000
        RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,400,000$6,400,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
        RD
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $950,000$950,000
        G
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
        LD
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        RD
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        LD/RD
        RFA - 2
        ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,875,000$6,875,000
        C, RW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        RW, LW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $3,000,000$3,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,295,000$1,295,000
        LW, RW
        RFA - 3
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $874,125$874,125
        C, LW
        RFA - 1

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:11 a.m.
        #51
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2021
        Posts: 891
        Likes: 233
        Quoting: JaredOfLondon
        it's amazing how i need to admit im wrong when no one has provided a single actual shred of evidence against my point.


        LOL Bro my mom is a narcissist and admits shes wrong more than you
        Salzy liked this.
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:12 a.m.
        #52
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 2,741
        Likes: 813
        Quoting: JaredOfLondon
        2 seconds on google later
        https://www.yardbarker.com/nhl/articles/maple_leafs_believed_to_have_interest_in_ben_chiarot/s1_16454_37070933


        Thank you, but I had asked for one where it said he was the TOP target, not a guy they had interest in like the 32 thoughts suggested today
        Salzy liked this.
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:12 a.m.
        #53
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,200
        Likes: 6,055
        Quoting: ToneCapone420
        LOL Bro my mom is a narcissist and admits shes wrong more than you


        Some users on here are a lost cause, they feed off of the arguments
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:12 a.m.
        #54
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 20,256
        Likes: 7,515
        Quoting: ToneCapone420
        LOL Bro my mom is a narcissist and admits shes wrong more than you


        Ok bro, if im so easily wrong then find me a quote that proves it bro!
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:13 a.m.
        #55
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 20,256
        Likes: 7,515
        Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
        Thank you, but I had asked for one where it said he was the TOP target, not a guy they had interest in like the 32 thoughts suggested today


        a literal quote from the article about what friedman says

        "According to Elliotte Friedman, expect the Toronto Maple Leafs to be a team often mentioned in connection with any pending Ben Chiarot trade out of Montreal. While the Maple Leafs certainly won’t be the only team interested — St. Louis, Florida, and Calgary are also mentioned — Toronto has had interest before and may potentially have interest again."
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:17 a.m.
        #56
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 2,741
        Likes: 813
        Quoting: JaredOfLondon
        a literal quote from the article about what friedman says

        "According to Elliotte Friedman, expect the Toronto Maple Leafs to be a team often mentioned in connection with any pending Ben Chiarot trade out of Montreal. While the Maple Leafs certainly won’t be the only team interested — St. Louis, Florida, and Calgary are also mentioned — Toronto has had interest before and may potentially have interest again."


        correct, you see where youre not providing what im looking for right?
        Salzy liked this.
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:19 a.m.
        #57
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 20,256
        Likes: 7,515
        Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
        correct, you see where youre not providing what im looking for right?


        oh? it's got all the exact same traits as the lindholm quote. Friedman is blatantly speculating. If no one else is going to put in more leg work to prove their point and swing their cod around like they are 100% correct then why should I?
        You want more details, you can either put the work in on the lindholm side or do your own chariot research.
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:31 a.m.
        #58
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 2,741
        Likes: 813
        Quoting: JaredOfLondon
        oh? it's got all the exact same traits as the lindholm quote. Friedman is blatantly speculating. If no one else is going to put in more leg work to prove their point and swing their cod around like they are 100% correct then why should I?
        You want more details, you can either put the work in on the lindholm side or do your own chariot research.


        Ok thanks for confirming
        Mar. 17, 2022 at 10:33 a.m.
        #59
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 20,256
        Likes: 7,515
        Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
        Ok thanks for confirming


        yeah, you too.
        SNipeSHowInc liked this.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll