It's the estimated value added by his shots contribution, and Boqvist is currently shooting at 20%.

That high shooting percentage is not sustainable long-term, but I wonder how much impact does it have on that WAR rating

WAR has honestly been a bit ?? to me.

Since the model is only considering data from this season it thinks Boqvist is a crazy good shooter since he has scored 10 goals on only 50 shots (shooting 20%) with approximately 4 expected goals. The model thinks he is an elite shooter because he can score more goals than expected and can score on a high percentage of his shots, however its likely that he has just been lucky this season - 20% shooting for a defenseman isnt sustainable

Percentiles are separated between D men and forwards and since this is an extremely high shooting percentage for a defenseman he ranks in the 100th percentile for that position

The crazy high shooting percentage does inflate his WAR, but it shouldn't have much impact on his expected WAR.

You definitely have to take WAR data with a grain of salt, especially since this is all /60 data and only for 1 season. Some player's WAR/60 percentiles can be very inflated by super high shooting or penalty differentials even if they are average in other categories

Adam Boqvist is a good example of unsustainable shooting inflating his WAR and Mackenzie Entwistle is an example of penalty differential inflating his WAR

I also wonder why is Patrick Kane such a WAR nightmare given he's Top20 in points

Damn Pulock.

That's a shot.

clutterbuck secondary assist, trade value just skyrocketed

Went from 6th to a 4th lol

Oilers scored two minutes in…

Come on NJ you can win

Hes ranked pretty poorly by most advanced stats at this point in his career tbh. He has a (very) negative impact defensively on GA/60 and xGA/60 and is given very offensive deployment which allows him to rack up points. On offense his P/60 isnt as high as you would expect for someone who's top 20 in points since he gets so much ice time, but I still think the model underrates him offensively and on the PP. The model isnt perfect and there are likely many things that Kane does well (eg playmaking ability) which the model might not pick up on.

You can find outliers in a lot of these stats but in most cases I think WAR is useful as long as you dont take it as gospel

So did Beauvillier hook Peterson or did Peterson take his stick

Peterson should be suspended minimum 5 games

the beautiful game pic.twitter.com/0Ovg5Ymxbf

— Dimitri Filipovic (@DimFilipovic) March 19, 2022

Robertson-Hintz-Pavelski
Palat-Seguin-Johnston
Peterson-Benn-Gurianov
Raffl/Glendening-XXX-Kiviranta

Lindell-Heiskanen
Harley-XXX
Suter-Hakanpaa

Oettinger
XXX

I'm not opposed to that but it's going to be mighty difficult to make it work financially.

Getting Palat would be great though.

Faksa has to go. And flip Dellandrea and a pick for Bear or something

Everyone when Everyone if Brisebois trades Dubas did the2 1sts for Hagel same thing pic.twitter.com/bXrYq4j9LS

— Buds All Day Podcast (@BudsAllDayCast) March 19, 2022

Apparently Nick Paul could be a sign and trade like Pageau. There’s plenty of interest. Imagine all that just to get a 3rd rounder after holding him out

Tbh at least in CF people have been calling Brisebois a donkey too

LA or Buffalo could afford but idk if he fits.

LA could do it . Buffalo wouldn’t do it.

Kempe
Turcotte
Clarke
1st

BUFFALO CLAIM HIM...

Whole lot of agreeing coming from here.

...does that even work...grammatically I mean

According to reports Chicago wanted Knies + 1st + another prospect for Hagel (Most likely Hirovinen or Voit)

So lets say Dubas spent the 2023 1st + Knies + Hirovinen would anyone be happy if he did no. They would go he really paid that much for this guy

If it was a 1st + Hirovinen k I would let that slide. But anymore oh god no.