SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(MIN/SEA) - Rask for future considerations

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:22 p.m.
#1
Trade confirmed: Minnesota Wild - Seattle Kraken
Trade Details
Minnesota Wild Acquire:
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
Future Considerations
Sum: $0$0$0
Change: -$875,000
Change: -$2,000,000
Change: +$196,000,000
Seattle Kraken Acquire:
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
Victor Rask ($2,000,000 retained - 50%) · $875,000$2,000,000$0 (AHL/JR)
Sum: $875,000$2,000,000$0
Change: +$875,000
Change: +$2,000,000
Change: -$196,000,000
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:22 p.m.
#2
GoJetsGo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 522
What
First
JackForHart and oilersfan150 liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:22 p.m.
#3
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 10,707
Likes: 10,271
This is wild

Retained salary and then traded for future considerations? This might be the first one in NHL history.
JackForHart, RawDeal, oilersfan150 and 5 others liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#4
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 4,321
SEA needs bodies.
JackForHart, Sportnilsson, PraVin26 and 3 others liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:24 p.m.
#5
Tintin over 1122
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 15,929
Likes: 10,166
Lol
JackForHart and Tntpod liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:25 p.m.
#6
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,917
Likes: 20,926
How did they not pay to move him...
JackForHart, Rangsey, AndrewLadd and 4 others liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:25 p.m.
#7
More Finns More Wins
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 524
Likes: 631
Nobody has mentioned Nino Niederreiter yet and I'm here to fix that
JackForHart, AndrewLadd, capfriendlyaccount and 6 others liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:25 p.m.
#8
1-0 them
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 2,075
Seattle might get a player next year
Tntpod liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:26 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 833
Quoting: Hurricanes_WPG
Nobody has mentioned Nino Niederreiter yet and I'm here to fix that


Who the f*** is that guy?
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:27 p.m.
#10
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,810
Likes: 4,449
Good trade all 'round applaud
Tntpod liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:27 p.m.
#11
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Weird that Seattle didn’t even get like a pick or sm
aadoyle and capfriendlyaccount liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:30 p.m.
#12
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 1,549
Quoting: Hurricanes_WPG
Nobody has mentioned Nino Niederreiter yet and I'm here to fix that


Okay...
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:42 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 110
Likes: 153
Wow, Minnesota is paying a lot of money to players who are not on their team.
plasticnettles, ColonelX, capfriendlyaccount and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 6:52 p.m.
#14
yippee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 2,171
To get a fresh body on the ice that's a pretty good deal for Seattle. Rask may not be that good anymore but he isn't totally washed, definitely a decent contributor for the Kraken's bottom 6.

Also great for Minnesota to get out from under the contract, even if they had to retain to make it happen
Mar. 21, 2022 at 7:09 p.m.
#15
Minnesota Wild
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 989
Likes: 334
Quoting: Radovan
Wow, Minnesota is paying a lot of money to players who are not on their team.


Considering the fact that he's been in Iowa for the last couple months, this is saving us money, both in real money and cap space. He's a UFA at the end of the year so it's not like this is long term dead cap. Instead of paying $4 million for a guy to waste away in the minors, we will gladly pay $2 million to get rid of him for the rest of the season and let him have a chance to earn a contract next year.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 7:09 p.m.
#16
ovechtrick
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 51
Likes: 86
Quoting: Hurricanes_WPG
Nobody has mentioned Nino Niederreiter yet and I'm here to fix that


It was one for one
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 7:30 p.m.
#17
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 743
For me Kraken win this trade. The Kraken get a decent bottom 6 forward to help with the depth. The Wild finally get rid of Rask’s contract. Rask isn’t a really good player but with a team like Seattle who’s doing pretty bad he could definitely help them out so for me this is win for Seattle but barley.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 7:44 p.m.
#18
HonestHockeyNYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 309
Likes: 278
Since Minnesota didn't have to give up assets to unload his contract, they win this trade.
Mar. 21, 2022 at 8:08 p.m.
#19
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,223
Likes: 5,586
Edited Mar. 21, 2022 at 8:23 p.m.
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
This is wild

Retained salary and then traded for future considerations? This might be the first one in NHL history.


Unfortunately the Leafs actually 'won' this honour too.
Ever heard of Larry Murphy? You might know him from the hockey hall of fame. We paid part of his salary in the trade
Mar. 21, 2022 at 9:39 p.m.
#20
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
The reason the Wild didn't give up a pick and retained salary is because they literally did not have to move him. He could have sat in Iowa the rest of the season and the Wild wouldn't have had any issues. They found a team that would take him for the rest of the season and (probably) give him a chance at some NHL games. Guerin did this completely as a favor to Rask for being a good sport during his time with the Wild.
Mar. 22, 2022 at 1:29 a.m.
#21
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 8,117
Likes: 4,684
Thought they would've had to paid to get rid of him. Maybe rask can rebound in Seattle, and Minnesota gets that all important cap space. A win-win
Mar. 22, 2022 at 8:10 a.m.
#22
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
Thought they would've had to paid to get rid of him. Maybe rask can rebound in Seattle, and Minnesota gets that all important cap space. A win-win


He's an expiring contract and the Wild didn't need the cap space to make any further deals. Deal was purely about giving Rask a chance to play in the NHL for the rest of the season with Seattle's roster being trimmed down from the TDL.
Mar. 22, 2022 at 11:07 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 548
Quoting: JayTea
He's an expiring contract and the Wild didn't need the cap space to make any further deals. Deal was purely about giving Rask a chance to play in the NHL for the rest of the season with Seattle's roster being trimmed down from the TDL.


Exactly. Fitting that he goes back to the GM who signed him to that contract. A decent move by the Wild giving him a chance to get back into the NHL.
JayTea liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit