if you have klingberg, why trade him for faulk? Klingberg is younger and i think he'll be better than faulk.

How does artturi lehkonen get you artemi panarin? And methinks you could get more for pacioretty than a first rounder

holy **** they lost a close playoff series, no need to blow up the entire team. Still have Weber and Price in primes, work to build around them while u still can for fucks sake. Plus, some of these trades are completely unrealistic

Surprisingly Klingberg and Faulk have only one year difference. It might not make sense to everyone but the fact that Faulk is 30 pounds heavier is the reason I'm willing to give up on Klingbergs 2 inches in height and the 2 extra years on his contract. I also believe that Lehkonen showed alot of potential in the last stretch of the season and in the 1st rnd vs the Rangers despite playing with scrap centers. Chicago is in cap trouble and would be saving 5 mill. As for Pacioretty his poor play in the playoffs and with 1 year left on his contract drops his value.

I can't build anything around Price when he's gonna ask for the moon next year. Won't be able to afford quality pieces to add. You're probably referring to the Dallas trade as unrealistic. But being realistic doesn't get you far. I think that Dallas doesn't regress at all.

Tabarnak que tu en fumme du bon toi . Pas remis dla brosse que ta virer hier ou tes juste un est de crétin

Whoa whoa calm toi mon chump. Your boy Bergevin clearly sucks, stop being such a homer. You gonna give Pacioretty 7 mill? Price 9 mill? Galchenyuk 6 mill? Petry deserves 5.5 mill? Baulieu? What's the point? Stop being so attached to players, don't you want the cup? Check Kassian a Edmonton, why didn't Bergevin give him a real chance in MTL? SCRIVENS!! Lol . I'll show your boys in MTL how not to be racist and engagé some real people that know hockey. Bergevin hired his neighbors down the street to develop our prospects what a joke.