Forums/NHL Trades

(TOR/PHI) - Menell for future considerations

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar. 23 at 7:50 p.m.
#1
Trade confirmed: Philadelphia Flyers - Toronto Maple Leafs
Trade Details
Philadelphia Flyers Acquire:
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
Brennan Menell · $0$750,000$400,000 (AHL/JR)
Sum: $0$750,000$400,000
Change: $0
Change: +$750,000
Change: +$400,000
Toronto Maple Leafs Acquire:
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Future Considerations
Sum: $0$0$0
Change: $0
Change: -$750,000
Change: -$400,000
Mar. 23 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Josh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 382
Likes: 212
God damn... heard Future Considerations was a legend for the Flyers, can't believe they'd just give him up like that.
Mar. 23 at 7:55 p.m.
#3
Geertsen for ArtRoss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 1,027
blockbuster
Mar. 23 at 8:03 p.m.
#4
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 16,176
Likes: 13,499
FC has officially broken the record for most teams being traded to in a season
capfriendlyaccount, Saskleaf, Zuki9797 and 4 others liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:04 p.m.
#5
GoJetsGo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 454
I'll bet there's gonna be a lot less "thought teams couldn't trade after the deadline??" comments this year with the Dadonov situation
Zuki9797 and Tntpod liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:26 p.m.
#6
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 2,153
The Wild are not getting the draft pick from the first trade for Menell.

Also, the future of the Leafs will eventually be considered by the Flyers.

Just not today.


Flyers win.

Leafs and Wild lose.
Zuki9797 and M_Swann liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:29 p.m.
#7
Saskflame for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 7,004
Can Menell play of the flyers AHL team this season? If so they win. If not, fair trade.
Mar. 23 at 9:34 p.m.
#8
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 5,804
Quoting: Saskleaf
Can Menell play of the flyers AHL team this season? If so they win. If not, fair trade.


Yeah he can
Saskleaf and Boubou79 liked this.
Mar. 23 at 10:34 p.m.
#9
worst poster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,151
Likes: 7,720
oh no he won't be able to play in the nhl anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JetsCanesSens, Saskleaf, capfriendlyaccount and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 23 at 10:52 p.m.
#10
ActuallySensFlames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 874
Philli wins.
Mar. 23 at 10:53 p.m.
#11
ActuallySensFlames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 874
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
Yeah he can


Oh K i didn't know that.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 24 at 6:48 a.m.
#12
Lifelong Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 103
Likes: 55
I wonder if this trade was actually made before the deadline, or the GMs were just taking advantage of the Dadanov situation. Leafs win if Future Considerations > Roster Flexibility (Empty Roster Spot). Flyers win if Menell > Future Considerations. Future Considerations has to be something, so the real loser here is the Wild.
Mar. 24 at 5:44 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 6,110
Likes: 1,478
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.
Mar. 24 at 6:58 p.m.
#14
First NY Then LA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 24,966
Likes: 13,862
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.


You're such a cynic.

And I say that admiringly.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 24 at 10:01 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 111
Quoting: LeafsForLife
Future Considerations has to be something, so the real loser here is the Wild.


Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?
Mar. 25 at 4:17 p.m.
#16
Saskflame for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 7,004
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.


Quoting: OldNYIfan
You're such a cynic.

And I say that admiringly.


Quoting: jr400
Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?


I'm not sure why you guys keep acting like the elit Future Considerations isn't a real player...

He's the best in the league. Everyone wants him lol.
jr400 liked this.
Mar. 26 at 4:21 p.m.
#17
Lifelong Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 103
Likes: 55
Quoting: jr400
Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?


I'm not sure, good question. Until I find out, Future Considerations have a chance to be something, and that's more than it guaranteed to be nothing, which is what Minnesota got.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 26 at 4:40 p.m.
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 44,705
Likes: 14,415
Mennell isn't an NHLer (according to the Leafs) and certainly wasn't going to be resigned by the Leafs/Marlies. Just gives a guy to show what he has in another organization.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit