SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hjalmarsson trade for Nielsen

Created by: tvis23089
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 24, 2017
Published: Apr. 24, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
1$945,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Hjalmarsson, Niklas
  2. 2018 6th round pick (CHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$76,000,000$61,883,128$3,558,000$1,197,500$14,116,872
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$872,500$872,500
LD
UFA - 2
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
$612,500$612,500
G
UFA - 1
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LD
UFA - 3
$945,000$945,000
RD
RFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 24, 2017 at 6:22 p.m.
#1
Leafs Rule
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 316
Likes: 15
Leafs aren't looking for 2nd pair d-men. We will keep Nielson and develop him ourselves.
Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:29 p.m.
#2
Buds all day
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 475
Likes: 67
Quoting: Dragongrave
Leafs aren't looking for 2nd pair d-men. We will keep Nielson and develop him ourselves.


Your crazy... Hjalmarsson is exactly what the leafs D needs, Nielsen needs 1-2 more years in the AHL
Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:30 p.m.
#3
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 16,132
Likes: 10,622
Hawks take a hard pass.
Sharp_10 and Hockeyplayer1 liked this.
Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:32 p.m.
#4
Leafs Rule
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 316
Likes: 15
Quoting: JimCarrey
Quoting: Dragongrave
Leafs aren't looking for 2nd pair d-men. We will keep Nielson and develop him ourselves.


Your crazy... Hjalmarsson is exactly what the leafs D needs, Nielsen needs 1-2 more years in the AHL


Yeah, sure, we are looking for a TOP pair d-man, not an older one who gets no points, and managed to have negative possession stats. On top of the fact he only plays just over 20 minutes a night.

PASS. Hjalmarsson is NOT what the Leafs need.
Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:34 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 184
Likes: 23
Quoting: Dragongrave
Quoting: JimCarrey


Your crazy... Hjalmarsson is exactly what the leafs D needs, Nielsen needs 1-2 more years in the AHL


Yeah, sure, we are looking for a TOP pair d-man, not an older one who gets no points, and managed to have negative possession stats. On top of the fact he only plays just over 20 minutes a night.

PASS. Hjalmarsson is NOT what the Leafs need.


lol sounds like you don't know how good Hjalmarsson is. This deal is horrible for the Hawks, Leafs would jump all over this
Apr. 25, 2017 at 9:12 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 199
Quoting: Dragongrave
Leafs aren't looking for 2nd pair d-men. We will keep Nielson and develop him ourselves.


This guy has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.

Hawks will pass on this deal. Makes very little sense when they are already struggling for top 4 D-men. You don't trade your #2 on a great deal for that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll