SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Created by: Krxvtsovv
Team: 2022-23 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 31, 2022
Published: Mar. 31, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$1,500,000
2$2,500,000
2$925,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Chytil, Filip
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali [RFA Rights]
  3. Lundkvist, Nils
  4. 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
  5. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,250,000 retained)
2.
CHI
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (LAK)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (NSH)
3.
CHI
  1. Holloway, Dylan
  2. Yamamoto, Kailer [RFA Rights]
  3. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
4.
CHI
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (STL)
WPG
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($5,250,000 retained)
5.
CHI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. 2024 7th round pick (CHI)
6.
CHI
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [RFA Rights]
  2. Nemeth, Patrik
  3. 2024 5th round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (LAK)
7.
CHI
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (TBL)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Strome, Dylan [RFA Rights]
8.
CHI
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (NJD)
  2. 2022 4th round pick (NYI)
NJD
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [RFA Rights]
9.
CHI
  1. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
  2. 2023 1st round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. 2023 7th round pick (CHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$75,067,628$237,500$1,350,000$7,432,372
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 31, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Easy NO for the Rangers
Krxvtsovv and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#2
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Wow this team is bad, no one should ever trade for Vlasic, four more years still would cost WAY more than a 1st
Krxvtsovv and ChiHawk liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#3
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1,997
Georgiev sucks bro
Krxvtsovv liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Krxvtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 121
Likes: 10
Quoting: delneggs
Easy NO for the Rangers


Kane and Panarin both become 90+ point players together again
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Krxvtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 121
Likes: 10
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
Georgiev sucks bro


Don’t see a winning path for Chicago
Kyle_Okposo_Lover liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:01 p.m.
#6
I make typos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 4,991
I think I would do that Oilers trade, DeBrincat and McDavid are good friends
Krxvtsovv and Nhl_oilers liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:02 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Krxvtsovv
Kane and Panarin both become 90+ point players together again


Not happening. Rangers are giving up that kind of haul for 1 year of Kane.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:08 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Krxvtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 121
Likes: 10
Quoting: delneggs
Not happening. Rangers are giving up that kind of haul for 1 year of Kane.


Worth it
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:08 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,701
Likes: 6,971
I don't see Winnipeg paying a 2nd for the "privilege" of paying half of Toews salary.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:19 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,598
Likes: 5,193
No thanks on McCabe.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Hawks decline the Kane Rangers trade...quantity not quality here not to mention a difficult russian player to deal with. Going to take KK or LAF and a 1st I'm betting
Hawks decline the Edmonton trade...that is terrible value for Cat a 24 year old elite player, top 5 goal scorer
Hawks decline Sharks trade...Not a chance taking on Vlasic's boat anchor of a contract is only worth a lottery pick
Hawks have no reason to be buying a goalie or Nemeth for a 3rd

The rest is doable and pretty spot on in terms of value
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,209
Quoting: oilersguy
I think I would do that Oilers trade, DeBrincat and McDavid are good friends



If we can make the cap work, I think I would have to accept too. He has 38 goals so far with the Blackhawk’s… I bet you he would get 50 with McDavid. I would like to take out Yamamoto if possible though, and add a prospect like Lavoie, or Savoie for example. I would like it if Yamamoto would stay on Edmonton honestly, he really plays well on our team. If we do this trade, then upgrade goaltending, we would be insanely good!
oilersguy liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:33 p.m.
#13
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 787
I’m fine doing kravtsov, nils, chytil, 1st (22) for Kane double retained and pick back as well
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:38 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,103
Likes: 3,602
Sharks aren’t giving up a 1st for a guy they can just buy out
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Krxvtsovv
Worth it


Not even close to worth it. 1 year of Kane for Chytil (22), Kravstov (22), Lundqvist (21) plus a 1st and 2nd round pick is as short sighted as it gets. Thankfully Drury is smarter than that.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:53 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Krxvtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 121
Likes: 10
Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks decline the Kane Rangers trade...quantity not quality here not to mention a difficult russian player to deal with. Going to take KK or LAF and a 1st I'm betting
Hawks decline the Edmonton trade...that is terrible value for Cat a 24 year old elite player, top 5 goal scorer
Hawks decline Sharks trade...Not a chance taking on Vlasic's boat anchor of a contract is only worth a lottery pick


Hawks have no reason to be buying a goalie or Nemeth for a 3rd

The rest is doable and pretty spot on in terms of value


Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks decline the Kane Rangers trade...quantity not quality here not to mention a difficult russian player to deal with. Going to take KK or LAF and a 1st I'm betting
Hawks decline the Edmonton trade...that is terrible value for Cat a 24 year old elite player, top 5 goal scorer
Hawks decline Sharks trade...Not a chance taking on Vlasic's boat anchor of a contract is only worth a lottery pick
Hawks have no reason to be buying a goalie or Nemeth for a 3rd

The rest is doable and pretty spot on in terms of value


Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks decline the Kane Rangers trade...quantity not quality here not to mention a difficult russian player to deal with. Going to take KK or LAF and a 1st I'm betting
Hawks decline the Edmonton trade...that is terrible value for Cat a 24 year old elite player, top 5 goal scorer
Hawks decline Sharks trade...Not a chance taking on Vlasic's boat anchor of a contract is only worth a lottery pick
Hawks have no reason to be buying a goalie or Nemeth for a 3rd

The rest is doable and pretty spot on in terms of value




KK or Laf for a rental lol
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:54 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 437
Quoting: ChiHawk
Hawks decline the Kane Rangers trade...quantity not quality here

Sir, any of these prospects would instantly be your best prospect.
Krxvtsovv and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 12:56 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: Krxvtsovv
KK or Laf for a rental lol


One of the top 5 elite game changing forwards to push the Rangers in cup contention for a late 1st and a bunch of risky players LOL
Mar. 31, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,991
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: saysthemachine
Sir, any of these prospects would instantly be your best prospect.


Chytil is a borderline bust and isn't a prospect at 22 years old and 4 years in the league; but hey he's better then Dach of course LMAO
Kravstov is way too risky, and I'd argue every day of the week I like Lucas Reichel more
Lundkvist is better then any of our prospects?

Sir, it seems you don't know the Hawks system and are using lose definitions of prospects
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Mar. 31, 2022 at 1:12 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,017
Jets Accept if they can get a good trade for Scheifele first
Mar. 31, 2022 at 2:05 p.m.
#21
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Hawks definitely decline the Cat trade. Holloway++ for us even to consider.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll