SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dadonov and M Pettersson

Created by: The_Rocket
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 9, 2022
Published: Apr. 9, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$7,500,000
2$850,000
2$762,500
5$4,000,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$1,250,000
2$2,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$79,851,842$1,250,000$1,150,000$2,648,158
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
C, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 9, 2022 at 1:33 p.m.
#1
Pens are the best
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,691
Pens accept
Apr. 9, 2022 at 1:34 p.m.
#2
Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 583
Likes: 254
I would be pretty upset if this happened for the Canucks
mv21227 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2022 at 1:41 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: BadBadgers
I would be pretty upset if this happened for the Canucks


This makes the Canucks better
Apr. 9, 2022 at 1:47 p.m.
#4
Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 583
Likes: 254
Quoting: The_Rocket
This makes the Canucks better


Maybe, but I feel like this team doesn't have a direction. We get better in the short term but I think we need to take a step back in order to lay the foundations of being an actual cup contender.

Also, VGK will have to pay more to dump Dadonov and I would rather keep Garland for that price
mv21227 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2022 at 1:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,999
Likes: 9,287
We should not trade for Pettersson. He’s a LD and we are already set there. The only player from Pittsburgh that makes sense for Garland or Boeser is Marino. Also think we should be able to get a pick for taking on Dadonov
Apr. 9, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: BadBadgers
Maybe, but I feel like this team doesn't have a direction. We get better in the short term but I think we need to take a step back in order to lay the foundations of being an actual cup contender.

Also, VGK will have to pay more to dump Dadonov and I would rather keep Garland for that price


This team has a pretty clear direction, which is to add speed and skill to the lineup. They also need to increase their scoring rate.

Dickenson was brought in to be a shutdown 3C, and has been really bad at it. He provides 0 offense and doesn’t fit the mold of what JR/PA want for the team. His contract has negative value and since it has 2 years left, it will eat up needed cap space for miller, horvat, and Hoglander extensions.

Trading him for Dadonov, who is not super fast but is quicker than Dickinson, adds some skill to the bottom 6 of the lineup. It makes the team better short term and gets the cap space in the medium term.

Garland is great, but under utilized in Vancouver. He provides no special teams value and is not getting 1st line minutes. I like him a lot but if he is going to be used like a middle 6 winger, it is worth while to extract some value from him to upgrade the Defense, which is a major weakness. Going from Poolman to Pettersson is a huge upgrade for Van. Pettersson is underutilized in Pit, much like Garland in Van. It’s a swap that makes sense for both teams. Pit add Kapanen since the value is clearly in their favour.

Kapanen can slide right into garlands role, adds an element of speed to the Canucks 5v5 and PK which they lost when they traded motte, and still can be a 40 point player. That’s huge for the Canucks.

Overall, the Canucks get out of bad money, add 2 mid 20’s players who fit in with the core and compliment a puck moving skilled team, and get better depth. The only piece of value the Canucks give up is Garland, who, as mentioned before, is not being utilized to the fullest anyways
BadBadgers liked this.
Apr. 9, 2022 at 2:33 p.m.
#7
Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 583
Likes: 254
Quoting: The_Rocket
This team has a pretty clear direction, which is to add speed and skill to the lineup. They also need to increase their scoring rate.

Dickenson was brought in to be a shutdown 3C, and has been really bad at it. He provides 0 offense and doesn’t fit the mold of what JR/PA want for the team. His contract has negative value and since it has 2 years left, it will eat up needed cap space for miller, horvat, and Hoglander extensions.

Trading him for Dadonov, who is not super fast but is quicker than Dickinson, adds some skill to the bottom 6 of the lineup. It makes the team better short term and gets the cap space in the medium term.

Garland is great, but under utilized in Vancouver. He provides no special teams value and is not getting 1st line minutes. I like him a lot but if he is going to be used like a middle 6 winger, it is worth while to extract some value from him to upgrade the Defense, which is a major weakness. Going from Poolman to Pettersson is a huge upgrade for Van. Pettersson is underutilized in Pit, much like Garland in Van. It’s a swap that makes sense for both teams. Pit add Kapanen since the value is clearly in their favour.

Kapanen can slide right into garlands role, adds an element of speed to the Canucks 5v5 and PK which they lost when they traded motte, and still can be a 40 point player. That’s huge for the Canucks.

Overall, the Canucks get out of bad money, add 2 mid 20’s players who fit in with the core and compliment a puck moving skilled team, and get better depth. The only piece of value the Canucks give up is Garland, who, as mentioned before, is not being utilized to the fullest anyways


Fair enough. Still dont fully agree, but I appreciate the thought process
Apr. 9, 2022 at 2:40 p.m.
#8
2018 Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 747
What exactly is the point or reasoning behind 1/7.5m for Boeser?

Hasn’t earned it. Might never earn it. Poor idea to reward him for a 4.5-5m season at best. He’s either traded or gets more term at a fair value.
Apr. 9, 2022 at 2:57 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: Nighthawk
What exactly is the point or reasoning behind 1/7.5m for Boeser?

Hasn’t earned it. Might never earn it. Poor idea to reward him for a 4.5-5m season at best. He’s either traded or gets more term at a fair value.


7.5 is his qualifying offer. This is sort of a “worst case scenerio” in that a long term contract can’t be worked out and no one wants to trade for him due to his contract. If that happens, the Canucks can sign him for 1 year at 7.5 and then re-sign him the next year at a lower number or trade him with retention at the deadline for a decent haul.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll