Quoting: Devil
Does liking a comment now mean I automatically agree with everything the comment says?
1. That comment never says Bratt is worth Power/Dahlin. It means Sabres would have to offer Dahlin/Power if the Devils were to give up Bratt (Sabres wouldn't do that).
2. I PERSONALLY NEVER SAID IT so you are continuing to make stuff up
This is why no one likes Wild fans
No, but the optics of it would suggest you do. Because that was the intent of that comment.
1) Yes, it does. By saying the Sabers would have to give one of them up, is by definition saying Bratt is in point of fact, worth one of Power or Dahlin. But you're right, the Sabres wouldn't do it because Bratt isn't worth that, not even if it's to pry him out of NJ.
2) Again, I KNOW you didn't. But the optics and implications of prior actions said otherwise. You didn't
have to say it personally for that to be the implication and logical conclusion. You say it's not, and I believe you.
For my part, I wasn't making stuff up, or at least that wasn't my intention. I was inferring and concluding based on the data at hand. If that conclusion was off-base and I was wrong... so be it.
Aside from a few bad apples, which is true of every fanbase. There are far worse fanbases then the Wild's. We don't even rank top ten most hated, and in point of fact we're on the opposite spectrum of that one. Not sure where you're coming from on that one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/riu7tn/jfresh_which_nhl_team_has_the_most_annoying/