Did we come to a decision on whether players with Black checkmarks in the expansion tool who were given contract extensions in this game can count towards the 2-1-1 requirements for exposure? I remember we had a discussion on it but did we come to a consensus?
We set the rules so that the CET was the deciding factor for players' status.
We didn't allow NMC waiving, so I don't see a reason to allow a change to a player's status from RFA extensions either.
To keep it simple, we should leave it as is, with a player's status in the CET being their status in the game.
We also did our RFA signings earlier than what normally occurs IRL, where teams wait until after the draft.
Technically, most of the RFA's we signed wouldn't actually have an extension in place. We were forced to do it for logistic purposes to get them to show up on our rosters and involve them in trades.
Otherwise we are getting into some more complicated things, such as who would prefer to use their arbitration rights, among other things.
In short. We've already agreed on the process and I see no need to change it, especially while it is in progress.