SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Forced Expansion Draft Trade

Created by: Kiekenapp
Team: 2017-18 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 27, 2017
Published: Apr. 27, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
EXPLANATION OF TRADES-
















VATANEN/STONER TRADE
Killorn- Top 6 Forward
Garrison - He is only added to take salary from Tampa Bay and used for Expansion Draft Exposure. Clayton Stoner is not eligible for exposure for Expansion Draft.








































































FOWLER TRADE- B.Montour has the same exact play type as Fowler. Ducks need improvement in the top 6 department.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,500,000
2$825,000
2$825,000
2$825,000
2$825,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
4$3,250,000
2$825,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Garrison, Jason
  2. Killorn, Alex
Additional Details:
Clears a little cap space for the Lightning to resign key players. Get a cheap top 4 D.
TBL
  1. Stoner, Clayton
  2. Vatanen, Sami
Additional Details:
Ducks pick up a Expansion Draft D they have to expose.
2.
ANA
  1. Larkin, Dylan
Additional Details:
Rights to Thomas Tatar
3.
ANA
    Expansion Draft Pick
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2019
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2020
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$75,000,000$67,348,417$0$1,500,000$7,651,583
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $4,450,000$4,450,000
    RW, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    $8,250,000$8,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $2,463,139$2,463,139
    RW, LW
    UFA - 5
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 4
    $8,625,000$8,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $650,000$650,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW
    UFA - 1
    $825,000$825,000
    RW
    RFA
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $2,602,778$2,602,778
    LD
    UFA - 5
    $825,000$825,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $2,300,000$2,300,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $863,333$863,333
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    $825,000$825,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    $3,700,000$3,700,000
    RD
    UFA - 4

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 3:15 p.m.
    #1
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 33,053
    Likes: 8,999
    Larkin+Tatar for Fowler+Jones Hell no weren't moving Larkin for Fowler. If Fowler wants to come home to Detroit we will wait until he's a UFA in 2018 no way are we moving our future captain for Fowler don't want him that bad if Larkin is involved.
    Kiekenapp liked this.
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 3:26 p.m.
    #2
    redw1n9s
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2016
    Posts: 1,911
    Likes: 572
    Quoting: Larkinisking
    Larkin+Tatar for Fowler+Jones Hell no weren't moving Larkin for Fowler. If Fowler wants to come home to Detroit we will wait until he's a UFA in 2018 no way are we moving our future captain for Fowler don't want him that bad if Larkin is involved.


    Weren't = were not. We're not / we aren't = we are not. Not only are you annoying as sh-, your grammar is pitiful.

    Back to the trades: I am all for trading Larkin (I would've traded him last year for Trouba), but that price seems a bit too steep when they could realistically sign Fowler for free next year. Add Silfverberg in there instead of Jones and you may have something.
    NateElder12 and pavelisgoat liked this.
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 3:33 p.m.
    #3
    NateElder12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2016
    Posts: 5,736
    Likes: 801
    no way to that Tampa trade. ANA gets severely screwed and I'd rather send a 1st rounder to Vegas to select someone else and keep Vatanen than do that horrible deal. Killorn is a third liner and Garrison is complete garbage. I don't care what your excuse for having to trade people is, i.e. expansion draft, it's not happening for that. Also, Vatanen doesn't need to be moved if Fowler is moving too.
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 3:39 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Kiekenapp
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 494
    Likes: 16
    Quoting: NateElder12
    no way to that Tampa trade. ANA gets severely screwed and I'd rather send a 1st rounder to Vegas to select someone else and keep Vatanen than do that horrible deal. Killorn is a third liner and Garrison is complete garbage. I don't care what your excuse for having to trade people is, i.e. expansion draft, it's not happening for that. Also, Vatanen doesn't need to be moved if Fowler is moving too.


    Alright, I will try another one then. Just trying to get creative.
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 5:17 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 2,161
    Likes: 229
    Quoting: Larkinisking
    Larkin+Tatar for Fowler+Jones Hell no weren't moving Larkin for Fowler. If Fowler wants to come home to Detroit we will wait until he's a UFA in 2018 no way are we moving our future captain for Fowler don't want him that bad if Larkin is involved.


    lol, Fowler will either sign an extension with the ducks after the season, or he will be traded, he won't be a UFA.
    Apr. 27, 2017 at 5:18 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 2,161
    Likes: 229
    Why would the ducks do the Vatanen trade? Why move both Fowler and Vatanen when you only need to move one? Also ducks aren't trading Fowler and Vatanen and still let Cogliano go to VGK.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll