Quoting: CMcAvoy73
The problem with that room for growth is that the contracts don’t line up. When the kids are on their entry deals, the team will still be bogged down by the Karlsson, Burns, Vlasic, and probably Couture contracts. Couture seems to have regressed the last three years, especially when compared to his late 20s version. Its pretty commonplace for forwards to decline in their early 30s. I wouldn’t be excited about 35 year old $8M Logan couture.
If the kids are good, they’ll want to be paid on their second contract, as they all do these days. Karlsson’s deal is still there. Burns might be for a year. If Vlasic’s deal hasn’t been bought out his will be there for some of those years. Coutures will be there and he’ll then be in his late 30s. Then you honestly have to start worrying about Hertl. He’ll be around Coutures age by then.
There’s just so much bad value there, that i don’t really see a route to competing, unless the cap goes up very dramatically, like $30M over the next three years.
this has all been figured into my plan,
Marchemnt is on a 2 year show me deal, Labanc is traded or bought out next year, vlasic the year after, Burns is up in 3, Couture and Karlsson in 5 and there will be cap increases each year.
combine all this with some of the prospects taking longer to mature and or possibly being busts along with more younger guys coming up we should be in good shape actually.
for instance Eklund and wright would be due new deals as Burns deal expires, both would get bridge deals for 5-7 mil bordeleau will get his when Vlasic is bought out, Meier once Labanc is gone.
it's not perfect but we would have enough and yes there may be a few guys squeezed out but thats NHL life.