SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does a trade up make sense

Created by: Salzy
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 11, 2022
Published: May 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Title is self explanitory, would a trade up in the draft make sense for the Ducks, and what would it cost
Trades
1.
ANA
    Lets use the Wings trading up for Cossa as an example of cost to move up

    Obviously wont be a perfect match since the move the Ducks would be making would be into (I would assume) the top 6
    CBJ
      The Wings acquired pick 15 in 2021 (Sebastian Cossa)
      The Stars Acquire picks 23, 48 and 138 (A first 8 picks back, a mid second and an early fifth)
      2.
      ANA
      1. 2022 1st round pick (CHI)
      Additional Details:
      6OA
      CBJ
      1. Steel, Sam
      2. 2022 1st round pick (ANA)
      3. 2023 2nd round pick (BOS)
      Additional Details:
      10OA, Higher of the two BOS/COL 2nd rounders, or the PIT second in the 2022 draft
      3.
      ANA
      CBJ
        Would it be possible without the Ducks second or the Bruins first?
        Buyouts
        Retained Salary Transactions
        Buried
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2022
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the PIT
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the NSH
        2023
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the COL
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the MIN
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        2024
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the ANA
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        22$81,500,000$61,886,125$0$3,700,000$19,613,875
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $2,037,500$2,037,500
        LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,456,250$1,456,250
        LW, C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,450,000$1,450,000
        RW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,725,000$1,725,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $3,000,000$3,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,700,000$1,700,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        LW, C
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $1,295,000$1,295,000
        LW, RW
        RFA - 3
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
        C, LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $874,125$874,125
        C, LW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $800,000$800,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,500,000$6,500,000
        LD/RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 5
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $3,900,000$3,900,000
        RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,400,000$6,400,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
        LD/RD
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
        RD
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $950,000$950,000
        G
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        LD/RD
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $750,000$750,000
        RD
        UFA - 1
        ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,875,000$6,875,000
        C, RW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        RW, LW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        May 11, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
        #1
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,663
        Likes: 23,809
        To get who?
        Salzy liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.
        #2
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Quoting: csick
        To get who?


        Probably Jiříček
        Salzy and Lenny7 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.
        #3
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: csick
        To get who?


        In my mind Jiricek or Nemec if one falls out of the top 5
        TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:41 p.m.
        #4
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Wouldn't be a bad idea, it all depends on the draft order up to that point. Doubt CBJ does this, probably needs a bit more.
        Salzy and csick liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:41 p.m.
        #5
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,663
        Likes: 23,809
        Quoting: TZ11
        Probably Jiříček


        I really hope he drops to Ottawa at 7 but I’m thinking he goes 4 or 5 unfortunately . He’s just too good and is a big RD
        TZ11 and Salzy liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:42 p.m.
        #6
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Quoting: Salzy
        In my mind Jiricek or Nemec if one falls out of the top 5


        I can't really see Nemec out of the Top 5, he should be a Top 3 lock imo
        Salzy, Lenny7 and csick liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:42 p.m.
        #7
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: TZ11
        Wouldn't be a bad idea, it all depends on the draft order up to that point. Doubt CBJ does this, probably needs a bit more.


        Oh 100%, im not confident this gets it done either, just trying to gauge the value of moving from 10 to 6 if one of the RD fall out of the top 5
        Lenny7 and TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:42 p.m.
        #8
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: csick
        To get who?


        I'm guessing we're banking on Jiricek Sznnnnn starting early!

        That being said, I'd imagine Columbus are in the same boat, since they have the same hole (unless there's a Cool-boy is still there...)
        csick, Salzy, TZ11 and 1 other person liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:43 p.m.
        #9
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,663
        Likes: 23,809
        Quoting: TZ11
        I can't really see Nemec out of the Top 5, he should be a Top 3 lock imo


        Nemec and Jiricek are lognshot to fall out of the top 5
        Lenny7, Salzy and TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:45 p.m.
        #10
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: Salzy
        Oh 100%, im not confident this gets it done either, just trying to gauge the value of moving from 10 to 6 if one of the RD fall out of the top 5


        It's a shame that we don't have a big, slow RD that Philly would give up 5 OA for tears of joy
        Salzy, TZ11 and GeneralLandro liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:46 p.m.
        #11
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2018
        Posts: 9,851
        Likes: 6,441
        So Columbus also probably wants Juricik so does trading back really help them? I could see someone like Arizona or Philadelphia trading back to get more picks as they are starting a rebuild, but Columbus isn’t they are “retooling” and need top end talent vs extra draft selections.
        Lenny7, Salzy, TZ11 and 2 others liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:46 p.m.
        #12
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: TZ11
        I can't really see Nemec out of the Top 5, he should be a Top 3 lock imo


        Me either but I can dream cant I tears of joy

        Quoting: Lenny7
        I'm guessing we're banking on Jiricek Sznnnnn starting early!

        That being said, I'd imagine Columbus are in the same boat, since they have the same hole (unless there's a Cool-boy is still there...)


        Yeah I didnt really look at CBJ needs before making this haha, definitely less plausible than I hoped tears of joy I would love if Verbeek could find a way to get Jiricek

        Quoting: csick
        Nemec and Jiricek are lognshot to fall out of the top 5


        Jiricek could because of his knee injury, I honestly think its more likely he's there at 6 than him being gone
        Lenny7 and TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:47 p.m.
        #13
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: Lenny7
        It's a shame that we don't have a big, slow RD that Philly would give up 5 OA for tears of joy


        We have a gently used Kevin Shattenkirk tho tears of joy
        Lenny7 and TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:47 p.m.
        #14
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Aug. 2019
        Posts: 3,758
        Likes: 3,217
        Probably not enough enticement to get cbj to move back. We need centers and right shot defenseman and we’re guaranteed one of those at 6. At 10 it’s much less. And the quality wouldn’t be the same either.
        Salzy, Lenny7, TZ11 and 3 others liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:48 p.m.
        #15
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: Ajp_18
        So Columbus also probably wants Juricik so does trading back really help them? I could see someone like Arizona or Philadelphia trading back to get more picks as they are starting a rebuild, but Columbus isn’t they are “retooling” and need top end talent vs extra draft selections.


        Yeah I didnt take a close enough look at CBJ draft needs before I made this haha, You guys definitely scoop Jiricek up if hes there imo. PHI seems like the most likely trade down spot then

        EDIT: @The_Cannon this response pairs with your post as well
        Friendly_Cannon, TZ11, Ajp_18 and 1 other person liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:48 p.m.
        #16
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: csick
        Nemec and Jiricek are lognshot to fall out of the top 5


        Agreed. I think we should just go best available player at 10OA (I'd kill for Jiricek, but so be it...), where hopefully Letterimaki is available. Boston pick could be packaged with other assets to go big game hunting (Chychrun?), or, I'm still banging the "Offer sheet Hague!!!" drum with our 2023 2nd.
        Salzy, TZ11 and csick liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:50 p.m.
        #17
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: Salzy
        We have a gently used Kevin Shattenkirk tho tears of joy


        Shatty and Derek Grant for 5 OA let's goooooooo tears of joy
        Salzy, TZ11 and GeneralLandro liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:51 p.m.
        #18
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Quoting: Salzy
        Me either but I can dream cant I tears of joy



        Yeah I didnt really look at CBJ needs before making this haha, definitely less plausible than I hoped tears of joy I would love if Verbeek could find a way to get Jiricek



        Jiricek could because of his knee injury, I honestly think its more likely he's there at 6 than him being gone


        His play hasn't dropped off since returning, so I don't think that factors in as much as I once thought it would.
        Salzy liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:51 p.m.
        #19
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2018
        Posts: 5,138
        Likes: 5,938
        Quoting: Lenny7
        Shatty and Derek Grant for 5 OA let's goooooooo tears of joy


        Throw in Dallas Eakins too tears of joy
        TZ11 and Lenny7 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:55 p.m.
        #20
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Quoting: Lenny7
        Agreed. I think we should just go best available player at 10OA (I'd kill for Jiricek, but so be it...), where hopefully Letterimaki is available. Boston pick could be packaged with other assets to go big game hunting (Chychrun?), or, I'm still banging the "Offer sheet Hague!!!" drum with our 2023 2nd.


        I was initially skeptical of Lekkerimäki to the Ducks because of the amount of good young goal scorers they have (Terry, McTavish, Perreault, Pastujov (+Comtois)) and I was unsure how a Top 9 with that many goal scorers would work. I also feared there wouldn't be enough quality puck distributors. But I thought about it and Terry is a great playmaker too (this definitely got overshadowed this season), McTavish isn't really a pure goal scorer, he can do almost everything.
        Lenny7, Salzy and GeneralLandro liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 12:58 p.m.
        #21
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: TZ11
        I was initially skeptical of Lekkerimäki to the Ducks because of the amount of good young goal scorers they have (Terry, McTavish, Perreault, Pastujov (+Comtois)) and I was unsure how a Top 9 with that many goal scorers would work. I also feared there wouldn't be enough quality puck distributors. But I thought about it and Terry is a great playmaker too (this definitely got overshadowed this season), McTavish isn't really a pure goal scorer, he can do almost everything.


        Yeah, I personally think it's the better of the potential fits with who might be available there. That being said, for as often as I see Savoie near the top, it wouldn't be the biggest surprise to me if he ended up dropping a bit due to his size (Caufield was similar) which would make me ohhhhh so happy.

        Edit: I also think Comer is pushed to play a more "Todd Bertuzzi" type game next year...banging and crashing power forward type game, where he *hopefully* fills the Grant role on Z's line.
        Salzy and TZ11 liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 1:04 p.m.
        #22
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2021
        Posts: 2,385
        Likes: 1,940
        Quoting: TZ11
        I was initially skeptical of Lekkerimäki to the Ducks because of the amount of good young goal scorers they have (Terry, McTavish, Perreault, Pastujov (+Comtois)) and I was unsure how a Top 9 with that many goal scorers would work. I also feared there wouldn't be enough quality puck distributors. But I thought about it and Terry is a great playmaker too (this definitely got overshadowed this season), McTavish isn't really a pure goal scorer, he can do almost everything.


        I'd love a Top 9 similar to this:
        Pastujov-Zegras-Terry
        ???-McTavish-Lekkerimäki
        ???-Lundeström/???-Perreault

        Not sure who I'd out at 2LW. Either Milano, Comtois, Tracey or someone not yet on the team. I project the first 3 to be Middle 6 players in the long run so I optimally someone else plays there. Maybe Yager (2023 Draft) but he's a Goal scorer too. Another LW in 2023 would be Musty. I could also see McTavish moving to Wing if the Ducks draft a C high next year (like Carlsson, Dvorsky or Ritchie).
        Salzy liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 1:05 p.m.
        #23
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,663
        Likes: 23,809
        Quoting: Lenny7
        Agreed. I think we should just go best available player at 10OA (I'd kill for Jiricek, but so be it...), where hopefully Letterimaki is available. Boston pick could be packaged with other assets to go big game hunting (Chychrun?), or, I'm still banging the "Offer sheet Hague!!!" drum with our 2023 2nd.


        Offersheet Kakko
        Lenny7 and Salzy liked this.
        May 11, 2022 at 1:08 p.m.
        #24
        Lenny7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 13,291
        Likes: 11,051
        Quoting: csick
        Offersheet Kakko


        I'm heavy on the Hague train tears of joy

        I wouldn't be opposed to Kakko...guy just needs to shoot the puck more often.
        Salzy, csick and TZ11 liked this.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll