SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My first year as Sharks GM

Created by: Rob32sjsharks
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2022
Published: May 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Lots of ifs and maybes here, but if everything in my plan came together I think fans and ownership would be happy!
Will (our Interm GM) has stated Burns and Karlsson are on the trading block, and I agree one needs to go. Prefer to deal Karlsson, but Burns will be easier to move. Simek and Balcers are moved for cap space and because we already have in house replacements for them, and Hill becomes the odd man out in net.
Draft we get either a C or D prospect, Lambert has the best raw skill in the draft but has fallen out of favor with a lot of teams, hopefully he falls to 11th and we can grab him and work with him. He has the ability and skill to be the top player from this draft but could also very easily bust and never play in the NHL so he is high risk high reward but at 10+ our choices really are either decent at best or high risk vs. reward. The rest of the draft is Best Player Available, with an emphasis on raw talent and and skill that we can work with to hopefully find another Diamond in the rough like years past (Laroque 21 Coe 20). another goalie prospect at some point in the draft wouldn’t be a bad idea either.
Free Agency sees us picking up 2 serviceable short term D in Edler and Miller (there might be better options out there but they both provide a bit of offense while still providing decent Defense) both can hold their own in a top 4 setting but are not long term fixes. The goal for them is to fill in and for Edler to provide to us what he did this year for LA, and LA likely moves on and gets someone younger like Chychrun. for Miller he’s been injured a lot with Buffalo but is not long removed from 2 years of really good play in Vegas plus both are just stop gaps until Laroque, Kinazev, Hatakka, Cicek etc. will hopefully all be pushing for NHL time.
the biggest offseason acquisition is of course Forsberg! his 30-40 goals would have made us a playoff contender. Add in skilled rookies Bordeleau and Eklund allong with improvements from 2nd year players and Injury returns and this team looks playoff ready.
key losses: Hill, Simek, Balcers, Burns, Vlasic.
Key Additions: Forsberg, Bordeleau, Eklund, Edler, Miller, Lambert.
key returns from injury: Knyzhov Labanc
I would honestly prefer to Move Meier Burns and Karlsson and go full rebuild but Ownership doesn’t want that and we have enough youth that will be NHL starting to trickle into our lineup starting next year. sharks should be good next year with this lineup and we should be able to continue to grow.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$786,333
3$786,333
3$786,333
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$875,000
2$2,125,000
3$2,850,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,500,000
1$2,500,000
2$2,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lambert, Brad
3$925,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2024 4th round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
3.
SJS
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (DAL)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent ($2,000,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$74,333,334$0$382,500$8,166,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$875,000$875,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD
UFA - 4
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,125,000$2,125,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 14, 2022 at 8:46 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,632
Likes: 5,769
Hawks decline. Not giving up draft picks for average goalies when they can sign one in free agency.
M0LSON liked this.
May 14, 2022 at 8:48 p.m.
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Would rather sign Miller myself if he accepts that contract and keep the picks over taking Burns.
May 14, 2022 at 8:58 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,195
Likes: 4,657
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Hawks decline. Not giving up draft picks for average goalies when they can sign one in free agency.


i posted Hill
to anyone, Chicago would be an ideal landing spot but i’m sure there will be a few teams willing to offer a 3rd for a cheaper 1-b who has potential.
May 14, 2022 at 9:00 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,195
Likes: 4,657
Quoting: justaBoss
Would rather sign Miller myself if he accepts that contract and keep the picks over taking Burns.

I could see that, But miller is 2nd class to Burns and again with retention your getting. a top min top 15 offensive D man for 3.5 mil a year actual dollars and that’s appealing to an owner. plus him and Pavelski hav ea. fantastic bond.
May 14, 2022 at 9:11 p.m.
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I could see that, But miller is 2nd class to Burns and again with retention your getting. a top min top 15 offensive D man for 3.5 mil a year actual dollars and that’s appealing to an owner. plus him and Pavelski hav ea. fantastic bond.


Sure, but at the end of the day we need to think about cap space. Do we have cap space to pay for $6M for the next 4 years for another aging D-man?

I would say no.

If you take Suter off our hands, we can discuss again.
May 14, 2022 at 9:14 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,195
Likes: 4,657
Quoting: justaBoss
Sure, but at the end of the day we need to think about cap space. Do we have cap space to pay for $6M for the next 4 years for another aging D-man?

I would say no.

If you take Suter off our hands, we can discuss again.


3 years not 4 and Sutter could be intriguing, but we would have to reduce the retention.
justaBoss liked this.
May 14, 2022 at 9:16 p.m.
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
3 years not 4 and Sutter could be intriguing, but we would have to reduce the retention.


Burns 20% retained ($1,2M) for Suter+insert prospect+2022 2nd?
May 14, 2022 at 9:18 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,740
Likes: 14,495
Another massive deal that takes a player past age 35. Come on
May 14, 2022 at 9:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,632
Likes: 5,769
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
i posted Hill
to anyone, Chicago would be an ideal landing spot but i’m sure there will be a few teams willing to offer a 3rd for a cheaper 1-b who has potential.


Oh yeah that team explanation is too long. Wasn't about to read it
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
May 14, 2022 at 9:58 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,195
Likes: 4,657
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Another massive deal that takes a player past age 35. Come on


you want a top goal scorer you have to pay long term and big money and he is 27 so he 34 at the end of the deal which isn’t bad
May 14, 2022 at 10:07 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,740
Likes: 14,495
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
you want a top goal scorer you have to pay long term and big money and he is 27 so he 34 at the end of the deal which isn’t bad


He will be 28 before he plays a game on the contract
May 14, 2022 at 10:22 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,195
Likes: 4,657
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
He will be 28 before he plays a game on the contract

still won’t be 35 until his deal is over!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll