I know this sounds ridiculous, but if Erik Karlsson is available, i think the Bruins might want to pay the price for him, as i think they really need defence. Sure, it might cost them Jakob Zboril, Charlie McAvoy, Frank Vatrano, and a 2nd round pick (or something like that), but i think it's worth it. What do YOU think?

Add 2/3 firsts then Ottawa might listen

Wait, so you don't think 2 top prospects and Vatrano and a good pick gets it done?

In what world would Erik Karlsson "be available"?

I'm not saying he is, i just think that they should consider trading him as they already have Ceci (who i think is one of the most underrated player in the league, and i think he's a number 1 defenseman). Yes, Karlsson is their best defenseman, but i could tell you something else, but you will probably think i'm ridiculous; I think if Cody Ceci is your best defenseman, that's not a problem. So i think Cody Ceci is the 2nd best defenseman on the senators, and Erik Karlsson has more trade value than Ceci (that is if you ask me, and most people would agree). SO i just think they should CONSIDER trading him, as Boston could probably put together a ridiculous offer.

1. You need to watch more Senators hockey before commenting on the Senators
2. Would you consider trading Burns?

I already watch the Senators. I just have a different opinion than you. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT WE JUST HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS?

Would i consider trading Burns? Maybe to the Bruins.

Sometimes an "opinion" is simply wrong.

Okay, would you trade Burns for: Jakob Zboril, Charlie McAvoy, Frank Vatrano, and a 2nd round pick (or something like that)

Please stop being mean to me. Neither of us are right or wrong.

No, i wouldn't. Anyway, i think Burns is better than Karlsson.

Telling you your opinion is wrong is not being mean. Facts prove your opinion wrong.



Then there is no chance Ottawa trades him for that package.

okay then, maybe Boston has to add more.

Please just stop telling me that i am wrong.

Okay you're right, Ceci is a #1D

You don't need to tell me that i am right. You can tell me that YOU agree or that YOU disagree, but neither of us are right or wrong.

What are you basing your opinion on?

Watching hockey

What about player statistics?

They are defensemen! Who cares that Ceci only got 2 goals this year??!??!?!

Oh, okay.

Kevin Shattenkirk got more points than McDonagh this year, so Shattenkirk is better than McDonagh, right?

Wasn't aware that the definition of stats was points and goals.

okay, you're right. So Orpik is better than Ekblad because of his plus-minus, right?

Yes, that is exactly what I said.

Now I understand though, the definition of stats is goals, points, and plus-minus.