SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Following Arizonas route

Created by: Angusc
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 29, 2022
Published: May 29, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Last season, Arizona took on bad or expiring contracts from other teams to get more picks and prospects. This thread will be similar to what they had done.

Since a thread brought up a Lucic trade, I will have to repeat for getting the 2nd rounder since we are also getting Monahan in return which can achieve 2 things in a single action for Calgary.

Some of the other trades were for other more cap teams to help hit the cap floor although the returns may not be great. Another one of these trades is if Boeser leaves due to wanting a big contract that is too much for Allvin.

Note, I know some of these trades will not happen due to overpayments or doesnt fit team needs, but this thread is mainly hypothetical. Originally, I put in Dermott to the Hawks for a 4th, but I scrapped that idea since that return was underwhelming. Also, I put in a pick for the Sheary trade as well as a prospect in Pelletier for swapping a 3rd rounder
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$850,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
2.
VAN
  1. Dumoulin, Brian
  2. Marino, John
  3. Poulin, Samuel
  4. 2022 1st round pick (PIT)
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Conditional 2nd that transfers to a 2024 unprotected 1st if the pick is at a certain number range.
PIT
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
3.
VAN
  1. Walsh, Reilly
  2. Zacha, Pavel [RFA Rights]
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (NJD)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Boeser, Brock [RFA Rights]
4.
5.
VAN
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (WSH)
WSH
  1. 2023 5th round pick (VAN)
6.
VAN
CGY
  1. Dickinson, Jason
  2. 2022 6th round pick (VAN)
7.
VAN
  1. 2022 6th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Originally future considerations
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$79,098,750$1,250,000$1,232,500$3,401,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
RFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$816,667$816,667 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 29, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 450
Likes: 181
huh. this nakes zero sense. you trade dermott for a 4th when worth a 3rd. you trade brock boeser for litterally nothing. zacha=3rdliner rielly=fringetop4dman and the picks are nice but the players. just keep boeser. conor sheary, why? we get no picks or players back. GGY trade is fine but add a prospect instead of the third
Angusc liked this.
May 29, 2022 at 5:32 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 708
Likes: 236
OTT declines
Miller trade actually makes sense
CHI easily accepts, why would Vancouver do that
Van does not get enough for boeser
phi + wsh says no
for 11+ Mil in cap relief to CGY, I hope they have a little more to give van for that
buf says no
May 29, 2022 at 6:26 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 32
Likes: 18
Why would the Canucks do this? They’re not a terrible team and have a decent core no reason to be a contract graveyard, status quo for a year and then transform your roster. No reason to trade Boeser for that
May 29, 2022 at 6:34 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 604
Likes: 229
Quoting: nucksfan40
huh. this nakes zero sense. you trade dermott for a 4th when worth a 3rd. you trade brock boeser for litterally nothing. zacha=3rdliner rielly=fringetop4dman and the picks are nice but the players. just keep boeser. conor sheary, why? we get no picks or players back. GGY trade is fine but add a prospect instead of the third


Now that I think about it, that is true for the Dermott trade. Originally, I was going to put Lars Eller instead of Sheary and would give us a higher return, but Sheary is the cheaper one.

I know that Boeser will most likely be staying in Vancouver, but I was having trouble thinking about what good enough of a return he is based on value. I was thinking about adding Severson, but he will most likely be off limits, so I put in the high picks and prospects.

For the Flames, not sure which player we should get. I don't think we can get Pelletier etc.
May 29, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 604
Likes: 229
Quoting: Ghostface
Why would the Canucks do this? They’re not a terrible team and have a decent core no reason to be a contract graveyard, status quo for a year and then transform your roster. No reason to trade Boeser for that


Its obviously not happening since its a hypothetical thread. But I was basing it on when JR said that this is not a playoff team during one of his interviews. So if that was the case, then this would be moves for the long term.
May 29, 2022 at 8:42 p.m.
#6
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,296
Likes: 5,742
Edited May 30, 2022 at 11:12 a.m.
So in this situation, Washington trades one of their best value contracts and a 40 point 3rd liner in Sheary as a dump even though they don’t need space, and they get a 5th?

Not happening.

Were you possibly thinking of Carl Hagelin? While there are different reasons that Washington wouldn’t need to dump him (possible career ending eye injury), it would make more sense.
Kalopsia liked this.
May 30, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#7
Do it now!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 823
Likes: 156
Oh look, another "Please trade us Marino" Vancouver AGM.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll