SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NYR idea

Created by: Hockeyplayer1
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 4, 2017
Published: May 4, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
NYR get a much much better defenseman in Seabrook over Girardi. Grabner is likely going in the expansion draft. The Rangers take on a bad contract but also give up one. The retained salary makes the cap exchange nearly equal. (its attached to Grabner so its only for 1 year instead of 3 on Girardi)

What do Rangers fans think of this? They don't give up much for a good defenseman.

Hawks protection list:
Kane Toews Hossa Anisimov Panik Hartman Grabner
Keith Hammer TVR
Crawford

Exposed:
Kruger Jurco Tootoo
Girardi (NMC not upheld in trade) Roszival Pokka
Glass

The Hawks get obviously weak on defense. Their offense is dangerous with 7 (nearly 8) 20-goal scorers. They also have Schmaltz who should be more developed and prolific junior goal scorer DeBrincat.
They could look to make a trade deadline acquisition defenseman if they saved cap space throughout the year by running a 22 man roster for a couple weeks. You know, like a good GM would do.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
2$700,000
2$2,250,000
1$800,000
1$650,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
., Bonuses
1$3,650,000
Backup, Goalie
2$850,000
Trades
1.
2.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$75,000,000$68,010,628$3,558,000$832,500$6,989,372
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$872,500$872,500
LD
UFA - 2
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
Backup, Goalie
$850,000$850,000
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
., Bonuses
$3,650,000$3,650,000
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 4, 2017 at 12:55 p.m.
#1
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,923
Likes: 4,651
Thanks for coming up with a realistic Girardi trade idea, instead of those ideas where he gets moved for a 7th or something.
May 4, 2017 at 1:04 p.m.
#2
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
i don't think the rangers i would do this deal, just because the way seabrook has played (yes better than girardi but still that's not setting the bar high) and he has like 7 years left on his contract.. id rather keep girardi for 3 and see if a team will take him with retained
May 4, 2017 at 1:15 p.m.
#3
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,806
Likes: 10,002
It's a very interesting idea. I personally don't think Seabrook is going anywhere. His Full NMC/NTC is probably why he bought a nicer house AND also bought the lot next door and doing renovations. I don't think he moves for anything. As for the trade idea. I think Stan would include a mid level prospect to NYR and the value is fair. The Hawks have an extra protection slot for a forward which I absolutely hope they fill otherwise it's wasted.
May 4, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
#4
runandjump
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
As a Ranger fan...i like that other people are trying to help us out by getting rid of Girardi. This however isn't the answer. I was laughing at Seabrook's contract the other day...that is NOT something we need.
May 4, 2017 at 2:30 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 199
Quoting: exo2769
I personally don't think Seabrook is going anywhere. His Full NMC/NTC is probably why he bought a nicer house AND also bought the lot next door and doing renovations. I don't think he moves for anything.


I think every Hawks fan knows that Seabrook isn't going anywhere. Just fun to do and see what may make sense.

So you'll pass up on a 40+ point producing RHD with tons of clutch playoff performances and 3 rings, when the biggest thing your club needs is capable RHD? That's interesting.
It would be 3 years of a WAY better defenseman until Girardi contract is up and then a few more years of Girardi type play by Seabrook which then he could be traded. Not all that unrealistic for 3 years of great play instead of an anchor.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll