SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blow It Up

Created by: Brandon412
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2022
Published: Jun. 12, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
2$1,000,000
5$4,250,000
3$2,750,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
4$4,000,000
4$4,000,000
2$3,500,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Donskoi, Joonas
  2. 2022 5th round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Hill, Adin
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (SJS)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (WPG)
3.
SJS
  1. 2022 6th round pick (WSH)
4.
SJS
  1. 2023 5th round pick (ARI)
  2. 2024 4th round pick (SJS)
ARI
  1. Balcers, Rūdolfs
  2. Couture, Logan
  3. 2022 5th round pick (SEA)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (SJS)
5.
6.
SJS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (NJD)
7.
SJS
  1. Fischer, Christian [RFA Rights]
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. 2023 7th round pick (VAN)
ARI
  1. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
  2. 2022 1st round pick (SJS)
  3. 2022 7th round pick (MIN)
  4. 2023 4th round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$69,033,334$0$382,500$13,466,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2022 at 11:09 p.m.
#1
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1,051
leafs accept
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 11:11 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,660
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: odyssey
leafs accept


I think that’s the only deal on here that would actually be accepted, all others get blocked by the other team or NTC
and the toronto one is weak! should be min 2 3rds
odyssey liked this.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 11:20 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Labanc is negative value.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 12:23 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,547
Likes: 3,870
Nobody is giving up a 2nd for Labanc. Seattle and Arizona trades are TERRIBLE for San Jose. I can’t even comprehend them honestly. I’d rather have Gregor than Studnicka too.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 11:16 a.m.
#5
D. Reedy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 173
Likes: 39
That Burns trade is a disaster. There seems to be a huge range in which people see his value but you can't overlook the amount of minutes he can play and that he still generates a lot of offense. I hate the turnovers too but I really don't think he's just a cap dump. I have no interest in Donskoi's return. He's not terrible but his offensive output is only the result of being around talented teammates.

Reimer is worth way more to the Sharks than a 3rd. His asking price to a contender should be a 2nd and a prospect. It's not that I think he has crazy value, I just don't see the Sharks moving him unless the offer is high.

So that Couture trade... wow. I don't think he's worth his $8 mil/year but yikes. Moving down in the draft to get someone to take him? No way. If they want to blow it up and trade him, maybe send him to a contender with 30% retention for a 1st but he's not going anywhere yet.

I like Gregor and I wouldn't move him plus a useful middle-six PK forward to bring back Studnicka.

I'd be surprised if any team wants to give up a 2nd for Labanc. At this point, it's probably better to hope he bounces back and ups his value.

The Vlasic trade is probably fair but I think the Sharks would rather buy him out this offseason or next than give up a 1st and more.
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 9:44 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,660
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Labanc is negative value.


low value for sure but not sure he has neg value. his metrics are still good but the system we run takes away any value or ability he provides and i think scouts and GM’s know this. i could see a team take a chance but anything more than a 5th seems like a reach. I really feel you play him with Bordeleau next season and and another skilled wing with a good shot and
he doesn’t get injured again I could see him 12-15 goals 35-45 points. i really think the sharks should hold onto him rather than give him away or worse pay someone to take him.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 9:46 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,660
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: DReedy14
That Burns trade is a disaster. There seems to be a huge range in which people see his value but you can't overlook the amount of minutes he can play and that he still generates a lot of offense. I hate the turnovers too but I really don't think he's just a cap dump. I have no interest in Donskoi's return. He's not terrible but his offensive output is only the result of being around talented teammates.

Reimer is worth way more to the Sharks than a 3rd. His asking price to a contender should be a 2nd and a prospect. It's not that I think he has crazy value, I just don't see the Sharks moving him unless the offer is high.

So that Couture trade... wow. I don't think he's worth his $8 mil/year but yikes. Moving down in the draft to get someone to take him? No way. If they want to blow it up and trade him, maybe send him to a contender with 30% retention for a 1st but he's not going anywhere yet.

I like Gregor and I wouldn't move him plus a useful middle-six PK forward to bring back Studnicka.

I'd be surprised if any team wants to give up a 2nd for Labanc. At this point, it's probably better to hope he bounces back and ups his value.

The Vlasic trade is probably fair but I think the Sharks would rather buy him out this offseason or next than give up a 1st and more.


pretty much took the words right out of my mouth
Jun. 13, 2022 at 10:32 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
low value for sure but not sure he has neg value. his metrics are still good but the system we run takes away any value or ability he provides and i think scouts and GM’s know this. i could see a team take a chance but anything more than a 5th seems like a reach. I really feel you play him with Bordeleau next season and and another skilled wing with a good shot and
he doesn’t get injured again I could see him 12-15 goals 35-45 points. i really think the sharks should hold onto him rather than give him away or worse pay someone to take him.


Hes being paid far far more than his production.

Negative value.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 10:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,660
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hes being paid far far more than his production.

Negative value.

but he has potential to rebound so again i wouldn’t call him neg value
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll