SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ACGM

Created by: planter5
Team: 2022-23 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2022
Published: Jun. 13, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$4,900,000
1$750,000
1$875,000
2$3,500,000
2$4,700,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,750,000
2$2,025,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Olofsson, Victor [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Bear, Ethan [RFA Rights]
  2. Bokk, Dominik
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
2.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CBJ
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,499,417$112,500$500,000$583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 2
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$875,000$875,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,700,000$4,700,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,025,000$2,025,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$750,000$750,000
RD
RFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$839,167$839,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 13, 2022 at 7:27 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,108
Likes: 4,974
A couple of thoughts.

Teravainen on the 3rd line? Really?

Olofsson isn't a top six winger, he's a 5-on-5 liability. He's a powerplay specialist and will help there, for sure, but that's not worth the 5v5 ice time.

Trocheck deal is interesting. If he's serious about coming back, maybe?

That's a weird number for Ian Cole but okay.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 7:40 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Caniac2000
A couple of thoughts.

Teravainen on the 3rd line? Really?

Olofsson isn't a top six winger, he's a 5-on-5 liability. He's a powerplay specialist and will help there, for sure, but that's not worth the 5v5 ice time.

Trocheck deal is interesting. If he's serious about coming back, maybe?

That's a weird number for Ian Cole but okay.


Olofsson certainly isn't winning any selke votes, but his 5v5 play has been fine. He would be lethal with necas.
sabres89, wojme and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 8:07 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,116
Likes: 14,135
Quoting: Caniac2000
A couple of thoughts.

Teravainen on the 3rd line? Really?

Olofsson isn't a top six winger, he's a 5-on-5 liability. He's a powerplay specialist and will help there, for sure, but that's not worth the 5v5 ice time.

Trocheck deal is interesting. If he's serious about coming back, maybe?

That's a weird number for Ian Cole but okay.


Olofsson is not a 5 on 5 liability or merely a pp specialist anymore.

Old, lazy news
sabres89 and wojme liked this.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 8:19 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,162
Likes: 2,942
No matter how many times you wish it, Staal will have near the top in 5v5 minutes not a 4C. Trocheck isn’t coming back. Someone will give him the Hayes deal and regret it by year 3.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 10:29 a.m.
#5
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
Trocheck might be back on a higher AAV 1 year deal (MAYBE 2) but no chance he’d go 3. He’s going to be 29 at the start of this season. Smaller centers don’t have a great track record of playing into their mid-late 30s. He’s a long term deal guy but maybe a 1 year and reevaluate.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 3:08 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 4,797
Quoting: Caniac2000
A couple of thoughts.

Teravainen on the 3rd line? Really?

Olofsson isn't a top six winger, he's a 5-on-5 liability. He's a powerplay specialist and will help there, for sure, but that's not worth the 5v5 ice time.

Trocheck deal is interesting. If he's serious about coming back, maybe?

That's a weird number for Ian Cole but okay.


Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Olofsson certainly isn't winning any selke votes, but his 5v5 play has been fine. He would be lethal with necas.


After Olofsson's wrist healed, over his final 34 games he had 15 goals, 13 assists, 28 pts and was +1
Those appear to be top line stats and not a defensive liability.
RoyalBlueSabres and GMTD liked this.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 5:45 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,108
Likes: 4,974
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
After Olofsson's wrist healed, over his final 34 games he had 15 goals, 13 assists, 28 pts and was +1
Those appear to be top line stats and not a defensive liability.


You can't just ignore the rest of the season, injury or not.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 7:21 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Caniac2000
You can't just ignore the rest of the season, injury or not.


I would say taking account of injury for part of the year as a sample size and comparing it to when he is healthy is what people do including those at the top.

It's like when Austin Matthew's hurt his wrist and wasn't scoring for a short period and then he was healthy and he started scoring again. Nobody was saying well you have to actually take into account the week and half he was hurt
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 8:58 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,108
Likes: 4,974
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
I would say taking account of injury for part of the year as a sample size and comparing it to when he is healthy is what people do including those at the top.

It's like when Austin Matthew's hurt his wrist and wasn't scoring for a short period and then he was healthy and he started scoring again. Nobody was saying well you have to actually take into account the week and half he was hurt


The fact you cannot spell Auston Matthews name hurt me.

Anyway, Matthews and Olofsson are completely different. Matthews had been a sniper his entire career. You're picking 36 games out of years of being a meh player and a 5v5 liability. These two things are not comparable, and the fact you tried to make that comparison is kinda funny. If a proven goal scorer hurts his wrist, there's concern, but Olofsson has never shown he's that level of player.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 1:10 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Caniac2000
The fact you cannot spell Auston Matthews name hurt me.

Anyway, Matthews and Olofsson are completely different. Matthews had been a sniper his entire career. You're picking 36 games out of years of being a meh player and a 5v5 liability. These two things are not comparable, and the fact you tried to make that comparison is kinda funny. If a proven goal scorer hurts his wrist, there's concern, but Olofsson has never shown he's that level of player.


Spell correct is biotch.

Obviously AM is the cream of the crop, but those situations are literally the same. So the fact that your arguing against this is kinda funny. Obviously im not here saying olofsson is AM, but olofsson when not injured produces at a reliable and above average rate. His 5v5 numbers have increased since he's been in the league.

I guess I just don't know what your issue is with him. And you say years likes he's been here for a long time he has played 2 years lol. Year 1 with predominatly a PP specialist with 5v5 concerns. Year 2 he improved in every 5v5 metric, and when he wasn't injured he produced.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 3:45 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 4,797
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Spell correct is biotch.

Obviously AM is the cream of the crop, but those situations are literally the same. So the fact that your arguing against this is kinda funny. Obviously im not here saying olofsson is AM, but olofsson when not injured produces at a reliable and above average rate. His 5v5 numbers have increased since he's been in the league.

I guess I just don't know what your issue is with him. And you say years likes he's been here for a long time he has played 2 years lol. Year 1 with predominatly a PP specialist with 5v5 concerns. Year 2 he improved in every 5v5 metric, and when he wasn't injured he produced.
No sense to continue.
You made your point, I gave evidence which was discounted.
When someone nit-picks your spelling instead of your point of view, it is best to just stop.
@Caniac2000
By your standard Ovechkin would also be PP specialist 17 of 50 goals (34%) were on the PP while 7 of Olofsson's 20 goals (35%) were on the PP.

Bear, Bokk and a 2nd is not a great return for Olofsson IMO.
GMTD liked this.
Jun. 14, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,108
Likes: 4,974
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
No sense to continue.
You made your point, I gave evidence which was discounted.
When someone nit-picks your spelling instead of your point of view, it is best to just stop.
Caniac2000
By your standard Ovechkin would also be PP specialist 17 of 50 goals (34%) were on the PP while 7 of Olofsson's 20 goals (35%) were on the PP.

Bear, Bokk and a 2nd is not a great return for Olofsson IMO.


Difference is Ovechkin put up 33 goals outside of that, and everyone knows the powerplay certainly props up his numbers.

Olofsson scored 13 goals if you discount the ones on the powerplay. You can talk about percentage, but if you're comparing Ovi and Olofsson, this conversation is over because you're insane.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll