Habs take that deal without retention on Petry

Canucks obviously decline

Add Liljegren and remove the 3rd from VAN and I think thats a deal VAN accepts

Van declines unless you add more

However, with the retention its an easy no.

Liljegren = untouchable IMO
Only way he is not a Leaf for the next 5 yrs or more is if he gets a ridiculous offer sheet.

Hawks probably decline. We can easily move Kane for a good return without having to worry about flipping Nylander for only gaining moving up from the 2nd to 1st round pick in this trade. Mrazek is going to cost a 2nd to move so really what you have is Nylander + 1st for Kane +2nd; Hawks pass.

Holl is worthless to the Hawks and they'd flip him for a 3rd or 4th whatever they can get basically washing out the 3rd in this trade the Hawks are giving back.

Hawks have NO RD after Jones. How would Holl be worthless?

Leafs don't.

Easy no from the hawks, Nylander doesn't make sense for the rebuild and hawks don't want to give up picks. Not sure if the value is there either.

Hawks are rebulding, they can sign free agents or just have Jones, Murphy, and one of Mitchell or Regula or even a lefty in that bottom spot. There's no pressure on them to improve right now.

Connor Murphy and I will take him every day of the week before Holl. Then they have two very good prospects who need NHL time, Ian Mitchell and Alec Regula, who will be fighting for the 3rd spot...thus Holl is a scratch.

Leafs can't take on any significant contract without retention so makes sense

Pretty lousy deal for Vancouver and you make then add retention? Lol that’s not gonna pass

1 yr of Kane vs 2 yrs of Nylander and a 1st.

How does that NOT make sense from a CHI perspective?

What do you think VAN can get for Miller as a pending UFA?

that's an awful deal for Miller

Assuming the first is to take on Holl and Mrazek. That leaves Chicago with Nylander who we don’t need as well as sending, a 2, 3 and 6 as well as 50% retention on Kane. Just doesn’t make sense for a rebuilding organization.

You are only paying him a little over league minimum now (not a great way to treat your untouchable players) and are over the cap with a 22 man roster once you account for last year's overage. With the way this roster is constructed he gets offer sheeted for a reasonable amount and Toronto will have a lot of trouble matching.

1 year of Kane 1/2 retained is a lot different that what you make it out to be. So Essentially it is 1 year of Kane at 5.2 million (also the better player who is a proven big time player in the playoffs which Toronto desparately needs in order to get over their first round shortcomings), vs 2 years of Nylander, and 1 of those years the cap hit equivalent is over 12 million. The 1rst round pick is essentially compensation for the 2 cap dumps included in this trade. So even if you drop the 3 draft picks going to Toronto in this deal, the proposal favour's Toronto. Leaving the 3 draft picks in this deal makes this trade ridiculously one sided.

A lot more than a third liner, B prospect, and a late first

Especially when you add retention and Schenn and a third round pick. You do realize that a 99 point player doesn’t come free. Just remember that Dubas payed a first round pick for a rental Foligno at the deadline

Habs decline. Petry is worth more than all of them combined and Webers contract wont help the Leafs. Would rather offer sheet Sandin for 4.2 million and pay a 2nd rounder for him

3 1st roundera are missing from the habs trade