SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bob being shopped

Created by: qc14
Team: 2022-23 Washington Capitals
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 15, 2022
Published: Jun. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
According to Kypreos and Justin Bourne the Panthers are shopping Bobrovsky hard and willing to retain a lot. The caps make a lot of sense as a team that (1) has a lot of cap space if backstrom is done (2) needs a goalie and (3) could potentially be a location Bob is willing to waive for with a lot of Russians and still competitive. These are what I think the caps would take for Bob at full salary, 25% retention and 50% retention.
Trades
1.
WSH
  1. Bobrovsky, Sergei
  2. Verhaeghe, Carter
Additional Details:
For Bob to be worth his 10$ salary, he would probably need to play at Shesterkin/Vasilevsky level for 2 out of the next 4 years making him a hugely negative asset. Panthers have basically no premium futures left, so they have to attach a very good roster player to make it worthwhile for the caps. I chose Verhaeghe, but Lundell, Weegar, or Reinhart would work too.
FLA
  1. Eller, Lars
  2. Samsonov, Ilya [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Samsonov gives FLA a 1b behind Knight next year, could be Vanacek instead doesn't really matter. Eller is still a good player and only has 1 more year left. Would fit Florida's 4 lines of offense well and could play center or wing for them on the 3rd line. Most importantly, FLA gets 11m in cap space this year and 14m the 3 after that. For FLA fans saying they're giving up too much, that is enough room for the caps to sign Gaudreau.
2.
WSH
  1. Bennett, Sam
Additional Details:
Bob at 25%.

Panthers don't take back Eller in this scenario to still give them the same amount of cap space, and would probably be able to downgrade the additional roster player slightly to Bennett or Duclair. Caps would want Bennett from those two.
FLA
  1. Vanecek, Vitek [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Vanacek or Samsonov
3.
WSH
  1. Denisenko, Grigori
  2. Noel, Serron
Additional Details:
Bob at 50%.

Whatever FLA's top two prospects are left, idrk who they are but I think its Denisenko and Noel.
FLA
    Vanacek or Samsonov.
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    2023
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    2024
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the WSH
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$82,500,000$79,857,501$100,000$850,000$2,642,499
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    LW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $9,200,000$9,200,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $2,850,000$2,850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $863,333$863,333
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $5,166,667$5,166,667
    RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $800,000$800,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $750,000$750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,425,000$4,425,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $894,167$894,167
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,166,667$4,166,667
    LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $1,275,000$1,275,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $950,000$950,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $791,667$791,667
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:03 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2022
    Posts: 3,123
    Likes: 2,793
    Bob at 50% probably has (slightly) positive value
    villenash and qc14 liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:04 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 10,247
    Likes: 7,114
    I think the biggest question is what the retention could look like-- cause if it's only $2m retention or something, the top two moves you suggest still add around $12m to WSH's salary cap. That's a lot of money to add a past his prime goalie when there are options in FA.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:10 a.m.
    #3
    Bandwagon fairweathe
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,586
    Likes: 3,250
    Is bob a 5 million dollar goalie right now? Top 12 ish? I would want something rather shiny to take that on for 4 years 20 million. Will be interesting year 3/4?
    qc14 liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: SK101
    Bob at 50% probably has (slightly) positive value


    Quoting: Birtle34
    Is bob a 5 million dollar goalie right now? Top 12 ish? I would want something rather shiny to take that on for 4 years 20 million. Will be interesting year 3/4?


    I think bob at 5m is in between these two. He was good, not incredible last year, but the two previous ones were bad. He is also a goalie getting paid 5m until he is 38 -- there is a very strong chance years 3 and 4 are really ugly. I also have the caps giving back samsonov or vanacek in this one, who they could get a mid to late second or early third for in a separate deal imo. From my (admittedly limited) searching, the prospects, which have both put up not disastrous but not great years in the AHL, are B tier, which I think bridges the gap.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: villenash
    I think the biggest question is what the retention could look like-- cause if it's only $2m retention or something, the top two moves you suggest still add around $12m to WSH's salary cap. That's a lot of money to add a past his prime goalie when there are options in FA.


    The podcast -- which is done by two actual reporters not just random guys -- said any amount of retention is on the table. I agree that bob at 7 or 8m would be a ton of money for a goalie past their prime, but verhaege, weegar, lundell, and reinhart are all good enough and on good enough contracts that I think it could make up the difference. Would you rather have Bob 7x4 + Verhaege 4.2x3 or Gaudreau at 11x7 if you were the caps? Don't really know the answer to that one
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:41 a.m.
    #6
    Bandwagon fairweathe
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,586
    Likes: 3,250
    Quoting: qc14
    The podcast -- which is done by two actual reporters not just random guys -- said any amount of retention is on the table. I agree that bob at 7 or 8m would be a ton of money for a goalie past their prime, but verhaege, weegar, lundell, and reinhart are all good enough and on good enough contracts that I think it could make up the difference. Would you rather have Bob 7x4 + Verhaege 4.2x3 or Gaudreau at 11x7 if you were the caps? Don't really know the answer to that one

    I would try to squeeze Florida for lundell and gamble on less retained possibly, just with a elc and team control possibly offset bob
    qc14 and Kalopsia liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:42 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: Birtle34
    I would try to squeeze Florida for lundell and gamble on less retained possibly, just with a elc and team control possibly offset bob


    Went with Verhaege to try to temper my caps bias a little but yea of that tier of guys lundell is definitely my preferred option.
    Birtle34 liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:45 a.m.
    #8
    Bandwagon fairweathe
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,586
    Likes: 3,250
    Quoting: qc14
    The podcast -- which is done by two actual reporters not just random guys -- said any amount of retention is on the table. I agree that bob at 7 or 8m would be a ton of money for a goalie past their prime, but verhaege, weegar, lundell, and reinhart are all good enough and on good enough contracts that I think it could make up the difference. Would you rather have Bob 7x4 + Verhaege 4.2x3 or Gaudreau at 11x7 if you were the caps? Don't really know the answer to that one

    I had a build a while ago with Jets trading helly and adding lundell and bob, might be a little aggressive. Is bob willing to waive or holding Floridas feet to the fire on where he wants to go
    qc14 liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:47 a.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: Birtle34
    I had a build a while ago with Jets trading helly and adding lundell and bob, might be a little aggressive. Is bob willing to waive or holding Floridas feet to the fire on where he wants to go


    Honestly no idea. He earned that NMC so he should hold their feet to the fire lol. Hate to be one of those guys but Miami to Winnipeg would be a tough sell, Miami to DC slightly less
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:51 a.m.
    #10
    In Zito We Trust
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 2,790
    Likes: 1,596
    Quoting: Birtle34
    I would try to squeeze Florida for lundell and gamble on less retained possibly, just with a elc and team control possibly offset bob


    ridiculous
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:52 a.m.
    #11
    Bandwagon fairweathe
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,586
    Likes: 3,250
    Quoting: qc14
    Honestly no idea. He earned that NMC so he should hold their feet to the fire lol. Hate to be one of those guys but Miami to Winnipeg would be a tough sell, Miami to DC slightly less


    Ya how do you sign off for -40 and snow and taxes? Better to stay in league over any other league I guess. I wonder if there’s some sort of Vegas goalie and dadanov deal that could be worked out, Vegas so up against it also though. Might work with a quick stop in Arizona lol
    qc14 liked this.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:53 a.m.
    #12
    Bandwagon fairweathe
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,586
    Likes: 3,250
    Quoting: VijayPatel11
    ridiculous


    Tell us how you really feel?
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 11:55 a.m.
    #13
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: VijayPatel11
    ridiculous


    Would you rather have bob and lundell or gaudreau??? that is basically what the caps would be deciding between in this scenario. Not that ridiculous
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
    #14
    Always have 2018
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 1,989
    Likes: 921
    Definitely do not want bob at anything more than $5 million, but think something could work at 50% retention.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:23 p.m.
    #15
    In Zito We Trust
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 2,790
    Likes: 1,596
    Quoting: qc14
    Would you rather have bob and lundell or gaudreau??? that is basically what the caps would be deciding between in this scenario. Not that ridiculous


    i am a panthers fan
    Lundell is untouchable
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:25 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: perrystreett
    Definitely do not want bob at anything more than $5 million, but think something could work at 50% retention.


    I think either full retention or no retention and really squeeze them for good young players, but anything in between makes it less worth it
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:27 p.m.
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: VijayPatel11
    i am a panthers fan
    Lundell is untouchable


    I'm not saying its a no-brainer either way, but the question of bob and lundell or gaudreau is not a ridiculous one that could be dismissed out of hand. And if you don't want to give up something good, have fun with a 10m backup for the next four years ...
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:32 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2022
    Posts: 3,123
    Likes: 2,793
    Quoting: qc14
    Honestly no idea. He earned that NMC so he should hold their feet to the fire lol. Hate to be one of those guys but Miami to Winnipeg would be a tough sell, Miami to DC slightly less


    No chance the panthers trade Lundell. Probably not even with zero retention. I’m not a panthers fan and I know that’s crazy.

    5 million puts bobs cap hit at 20th in the league. He is definitely a top 20 goalie right now. Even if the last two years are bad it’s still a decent value as of now
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:44 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 686
    Likes: 304
    Edited Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:08 p.m.. Reason: Name correction, meant Eller not Ellet.
    Eller & Vanecek for Bob, Bennett, a mid-round pick with 25% retained.
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:45 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: Rolfadinho
    Ellet & Vanecek for Bob, Bennett, a mid-round pick with 25% retained.


    Depends what other options in goal and at center are out there for the caps but thats something I think they would strongly consider
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 12:49 p.m.
    #21
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,246
    Likes: 1,859
    Quoting: SK101
    No chance the panthers trade Lundell. Probably not even with zero retention. I’m not a panthers fan and I know that’s crazy.

    5 million puts bobs cap hit at 20th in the league. He is definitely a top 20 goalie right now. Even if the last two years are bad it’s still a decent value as of now


    Being bad the last two years means you need to get something better than decent value the first two. And I agree that the panthers probably don't trade lundell, but for taking on bob with no retention it is not an unreasonable ask
    Jun. 15, 2022 at 1:00 p.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2022
    Posts: 3,123
    Likes: 2,793
    Quoting: qc14
    Being bad the last two years means you need to get something better than decent value the first two. And I agree that the panthers probably don't trade lundell, but for taking on bob with no retention it is not an unreasonable ask


    If he’s worth say 5.5-6 million right now then he doesn’t have to be worth as much the last two years of his contract. I think your Bob at 25 percent retained with Bennett and a pick is pretty fair. Could probably bump it up to 30-40 percent retained for a lesser player
    qc14 liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll