SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trading the Whole Team Pt 1

Created by: Neon75
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 9, 2022
Published: Jun. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Obviously super unrealistic deals. If you have edits to the trades, which I know you will, submit them and I'll make an edit where I fix the ones I agree with. I tried to make it as fair as possible but some of these values are hard to scope etc. Don't say in the comments like "Bruins say no" or "Ducks say no", give some ideas on what to change. Also don't think about what the players matter to the team because that kinda ruins the purpose of trading the whole team. (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRADING THE WHOLE PROSPECT POOL)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$2,200,000
4$3,500,000
2$850,000
1$1,500,000
2$850,000
5$4,000,000
2$1,800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$795,000
2$795,000
4$5,500,000
4$2,800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Mangiapane, Andrew$5,500,000
2023 1st round pick
2023 3rd round pick
Middleton, Jake$2,800,000
2023 2nd round pick
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Wolff, Nick [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 6th round pick (BOS)
2.
ANA
  1. Brännström, Erik [RFA Rights]
  2. Stützle, Tim
  3. 2022 1st round pick (OTT)
3.
ANA
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor
  2. Wood, Miles [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Devils get a really good prospect for taking on a terrible contract.
NJD
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. McTavish, Mason
  3. 2022 4th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Ducks let go of Henrique's contract while getting some decent roster players.
4.
ANA
  1. Engvall, Pierre [RFA Rights]
  2. Kämpf, David
  3. Kerfoot, Alexander
  4. Niemelä, Topi
Additional Details:
Engvall, Kerfoot, and Kampf are all serviceable and decent players, Kerfoot and Kampf given up for cap reasons, Niemela is to sweeten the pot.
TOR
  1. Gibson, John
  2. 2023 4th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
A bunch of depth and a decent prospect in return for a star goalie.
5.
ANA
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Myers, Tyler
  3. Pearson, Tanner
  4. 2022 1st round pick (VAN)
  5. 2022 4th round pick (VAN)
  6. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Terry is extremely good and Shattenkirk is decent, so it's going to cost the Canucks a lot.
VAN
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin
  2. Terry, Troy
Additional Details:
Myers is an alright defenseman with a bloated contract, and the Ducks have cap to play with. Pearson is a good bottom six guy, again bad contract, so a bunch of picks and Nils Hoglander make it worth it.
6.
ANA
  1. Beauvillier, Anthony
  2. Mayfield, Scott
  3. Nelson, Brock
  4. 2023 1st round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Trading older guys and Beau with a 1st to beef up the prospect pool with two really good players in Drysdale and Pastujov, and then two alright players in Andersson and Comtois.
NYI
  1. Andersson, Axel
  2. Comtois, Maxime
  3. Drysdale, Jamie
  4. Pastujov, Sasha
Additional Details:
Trading a bunch of young players for some proven performers and a first.
7.
ANA
  1. 2022 5th round pick (LAK)
8.
ANA
  1. 2022 5th round pick (NJD)
  2. 2022 6th round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
They need everything.
BUF
  1. Jones, Max
  2. Mahura, Josh
  3. Stolarz, Anthony
Additional Details:
Very little to give up.
9.
ANA
  1. Zadina, Filip [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 4th round pick (DET)
Additional Details:
Zadina needs a restart, and Detroit has the cap to take on Fowler's contract with the Boston first as a sweetener.
DET
  1. Fowler, Cam
  2. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
Giving up the bad Fowler contract with a late first for a player who could thrive in the system.
10.
ANA
  1. Megna, Jaycob
  2. 2022 5th round pick (BUF)
SJS
  1. Guhle, Brendan
  2. Larsson, Jacob
Additional Details:
This could be completely off, but moving these two has been so annoying I'm just gonna go for it and see what suggestions you have.
11.
ANA
  1. 2022 6th round pick (ARI)
Additional Details:
Contract swallowing and getting another first
ARI
  1. Silfverberg, Jakob
  2. 2022 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Getting rid of his contract at a high price.
12.
ANA
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Getting rid of Gardiner's contract, though it's not terrible and he is serviceable, so Milano is a decent return for the bottom to middle six.
CAR
  1. Milano, Sonny [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Taking on a contract.
13.
ANA
  1. Seguin, Tyler
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Pretty bad contract is sold off, but the player isn't terrible so getting Steel and a few good prospects isn't unreasonable.
DAL
  1. Dostal, Lukas
  2. Perreault, Jacob
  3. Steel, Sam [RFA Rights]
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Taking on Seguin gives the Ducks a top center who had talent in the past and could see it come back.
14.
ANA
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas
  2. 2023 6th round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
Getting Lundestrom and Vaak is a stretch but Korpi has shown potential before.
CBJ
  1. Lundeström, Isac [RFA Rights]
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
A goalie who has performed in the past holds some decent value.
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the DET
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the ARI
2023
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$73,410,834$0$2,800,000$9,089,166

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,850,000$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LD/RD, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$856,667$856,667
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 15, 2022 at 2:55 p.m.
#1
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
not giving up all of that for gibson. id rather stolarz.

kamph isnt a cap dump btw. he was our best bottom 6 player by far
majormoose007 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 453
Leafs Trade is a hard no, Gibson has not had a good season for awhile and that cap hit is a hard pill to swallow.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:01 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,088
Likes: 18,336
MacTavish is tempting...but Sharangovich is my guy. So would reluctantly pass.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 448
Hard pass for the Devils. Sharangovich is just scratching the surface and has chemistry with Hughes.
Capitalfail67 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:04 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1,940
Carrick has more value, he's was one of the better Bottom 6 players in the league last season.

Henrique's contract isn't as bad as you think. He's still a good player. Not quite worth the money or the term but that deal isn't "terrible".

The Canucks aren't even paying a lot lol. Pearson and Myers don't do anything and don't hold that much value. And no a bunch of picks and Höglander don't make it worth it when the Ducks are giving up their best player in the process.

That Dallas deal is just horrible, sorry for the harsh words. Sequin has been pretty bad and is not worth his contract, ask any Stars fan (@EsoYeezus69). He isn't even close to being worth a Top 5 Goalie prospect in the league, a recent 1st and a 2nd. Especially without retention. And Sequin is not a top line C.

Lundeström and Vaakanainen have more value than that.
EsoYeezus69 and Neon75 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:05 p.m.
#6
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: NHLfan10506
MacTavish is tempting...but Sharangovich is my guy. So would reluctantly pass.


Ouuuuffffff...I realize that this thread is a joke-y way to trade everyone, but I'd absolutely die if the Ducks used MacTavish as compensation for dumping Rico, who had 42 points in 58 games this past season (59 point pace over 82 games), especially to get back a non-tender candidate. I like Sharangovich, but no friggin' thanks tears of joy
Capitalfail67 and TZ11 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:08 p.m.
#7
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,268
Likes: 4,354
Henrique had 42p in 58gp. 19 goals. doesnt seem like a terrible contract.

Stützle is one year younger and had a better year than Zegras did at his age... even at their current ages Stützle only had 3 less points. seems irresponsible to give away that much for such a minor upgrade (if you wanna call it an upgrade)

McTavish is going to be amazing. i wouldnt trade him.

Drysdale same... hes a great talent. idk if the idea was to just move everyone for a weird value but i would rather see a great 1 for 1 for a player of similar value

i gave up after this so much to evaluate
Neon75 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:10 p.m.
#8
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 5,107
again with the caveat that I know that this is a bit: good lord that Isles trade is bad

Nelson (37 goals last year), Mayfield (top 4 D with $1.45M cap hit), #13OA, and Anthony Beauvillier (20 goal guy before his shooting percentage fell off a cliff) for Drysdale (good RHD prospect, nice so far), Pastujov(young winger, not bad, a few years away though), Comtois(mildly concerning), and something called an Axel Andersson?

I think if you weight potential vs. production, the first half of the trades are okay (Nelson/Mayfield for Drysdale/Pastujov), Comtois for Beau is two disappointing LWs changing spots, but that leaves #13 getting traded for Axel Andersson. Whatever value advantage you might give the potential of Drysdale/Pastujov over Nelson/Mayfield's realized production gets absolutely obliterated by this part of the deal,IMO.
Neon75 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:13 p.m.
#9
Jinx god
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,202
Likes: 13,730
Quoting: TZ11
Carrick has more value, he's was one of the better Bottom 6 players in the league last season.

Henrique's contract isn't as bad as you think. He's still a good player. Not quite worth the money or the term but that deal isn't "terrible".

The Canucks aren't even paying a lot lol. Pearson and Myers don't do anything and don't hold that much value. And no a bunch of picks and Höglander don't make it worth it when the Ducks are giving up their best player in the process.

That Dallas deal is just horrible, sorry for the harsh words. Sequin has been pretty bad and is not worth his contract, ask any Stars fan (EsoYeezus69). He isn't even close to being worth a Top 5 Goalie prospect in the league, a recent 1st and a 2nd. Especially without retention. And Sequin is not a top line C.

Lundeström and Vaakanainen have more value than that.


Yeah, Segs doesn’t really have the best of value rn. He hasn’t played too well plus he has a massive contract.
TZ11 and Neon75 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:13 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,092
Stuetzle > Zegras
sensonfire liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:25 p.m.
#11
Leblock_james
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 204
Likes: 74
Very easy no from Ottawa
sensonfire and PLDGEY liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:34 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 945
Likes: 475
Stars take that and run
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:35 p.m.
#13
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,810
Likes: 4,449
If it was Stutzle for Zegras straight up swap, you might have something.

Adding Brannstrom and the 7th overall pick is a massive overpayment.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 3:43 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 1,386
VAN is not moving a 1st round pick.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:15 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
again with the caveat that I know that this is a bit: good lord that Isles trade is bad

Nelson (37 goals last year), Mayfield (top 4 D with $1.45M cap hit), #13OA, and Anthony Beauvillier (20 goal guy before his shooting percentage fell off a cliff) for Drysdale (good RHD prospect, nice so far), Pastujov(young winger, not bad, a few years away though), Comtois(mildly concerning), and something called an Axel Andersson?

I think if you weight potential vs. production, the first half of the trades are okay (Nelson/Mayfield for Drysdale/Pastujov), Comtois for Beau is two disappointing LWs changing spots, but that leaves #13 getting traded for Axel Andersson. Whatever value advantage you might give the potential of Drysdale/Pastujov over Nelson/Mayfield's realized production gets absolutely obliterated by this part of the deal,IMO.


Alright so say the 1st gets removed, is that a fair deal in your opinion?
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:16 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: sensonfire
If it was Stutzle for Zegras straight up swap, you might have something.

Adding Brannstrom and the 7th overall pick is a massive overpayment.


Okay that's fair, I was more thinking Zegras just provides so much value on and off the ice, and he is one of the most innovative players in the league, so instead of adding Brannstrom and the 7th oa to the deal, what would you suggest adding with Stutzle?
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:19 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Henrique had 42p in 58gp. 19 goals. doesnt seem like a terrible contract.

Stützle is one year younger and had a better year than Zegras did at his age... even at their current ages Stützle only had 3 less points. seems irresponsible to give away that much for such a minor upgrade (if you wanna call it an upgrade)

McTavish is going to be amazing. i wouldnt trade him.

Drysdale same... hes a great talent. idk if the idea was to just move everyone for a weird value but i would rather see a great 1 for 1 for a player of similar value

i gave up after this so much to evaluate


Totally understand lol, just going to ask you a few questions though. The Stutzle for Zegras one I have addressed with someone else, but when you said you wouldn't trade McTavish, neither would I. This is a trading the whole team thing though, and he was considered on the roster, so I have to trade him. Is there any trade involving McTavish you like better? Also what do you suggest for Drysdale?
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:20 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: Lenny7
Ouuuuffffff...I realize that this thread is a joke-y way to trade everyone, but I'd absolutely die if the Ducks used MacTavish as compensation for dumping Rico, who had 42 points in 58 games this past season (59 point pace over 82 games), especially to get back a non-tender candidate. I like Sharangovich, but no friggin' thanks tears of joy


It's not really a joke thread, I genuinely did try, but I wasn't really sure of all the values of players. What do you think a better deal for McTavish or Henrique would go? I'm going to make an edit using people's suggestions so I would love to hear yours.
Lenny7 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:23 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: TZ11
Carrick has more value, he's was one of the better Bottom 6 players in the league last season.

Henrique's contract isn't as bad as you think. He's still a good player. Not quite worth the money or the term but that deal isn't "terrible".

The Canucks aren't even paying a lot lol. Pearson and Myers don't do anything and don't hold that much value. And no a bunch of picks and Höglander don't make it worth it when the Ducks are giving up their best player in the process.

That Dallas deal is just horrible, sorry for the harsh words. Sequin has been pretty bad and is not worth his contract, ask any Stars fan (EsoYeezus69). He isn't even close to being worth a Top 5 Goalie prospect in the league, a recent 1st and a 2nd. Especially without retention. And Sequin is not a top line C.

Lundeström and Vaakanainen have more value than that.


Alright, could I hear some suggestions from you? What do you suggest for Carrick, Lundestrom, Vaak, Henrique, Shattenkirk, and Terry? I still think taking on the Seguin contract would be good for Anaheim, I just want to know what a better price would be.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#20
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,810
Likes: 4,449
Quoting: Neon75
Okay that's fair, I was more thinking Zegras just provides so much value on and off the ice, and he is one of the most innovative players in the league, so instead of adding Brannstrom and the 7th oa to the deal, what would you suggest adding with Stutzle?


Nothing.

The same things you said about Zegras can be said about Stutzle as well.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 4:28 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: sensonfire
Nothing.

The same things you said about Zegras can be said about Stutzle as well.


You know, that's fair. After loving Stutzle's play in his first season, I kinda forgot to pay attention to Stutzle. Thanks for the help, I'll fix it in the second version of this I do for the Ducks using everyone's suggestions.
sensonfire liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 5:02 p.m.
#22
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,268
Likes: 4,354
Quoting: Neon75
Totally understand lol, just going to ask you a few questions though. The Stutzle for Zegras one I have addressed with someone else, but when you said you wouldn't trade McTavish, neither would I. This is a trading the whole team thing though, and he was considered on the roster, so I have to trade him. Is there any trade involving McTavish you like better? Also what do you suggest for Drysdale?

Quoting: Neon75
Totally understand lol, just going to ask you a few questions though. The Stutzle for Zegras one I have addressed with someone else, but when you said you wouldn't trade McTavish, neither would I. This is a trading the whole team thing though, and he was considered on the roster, so I have to trade him. Is there any trade involving McTavish you like better? Also what do you suggest for Drysdale?


McTavish was a 3oa pick... draft wasnt that strong but that doesnt mean his value has lowered. i would aim high bc i think hes got a ton of potential. i believe him and Beniers have similar ceilings. that being said i would try for Beniers Johnson (kent) Luke hughes if you are looking for D. i think TSN has him as #7 ranked prospect as of April.

Drysdale is amazing, i would trade him for like a Sanderson or Power.. i wouldnt settle for less
Neon75 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 5:15 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Obsessive Bruins Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 6
Quoting: Capitalfail67
McTavish was a 3oa pick... draft wasnt that strong but that doesnt mean his value has lowered. i would aim high bc i think hes got a ton of potential. i believe him and Beniers have similar ceilings. that being said i would try for Beniers Johnson (kent) Luke hughes if you are looking for D. i think TSN has him as #7 ranked prospect as of April.

Drysdale is amazing, i would trade him for like a Sanderson or Power.. i wouldnt settle for less


Thanks for the input!
Capitalfail67 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2022 at 5:36 p.m.
#24
Sabresguy1897
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 628
Zegras
Jun. 15, 2022 at 9:15 p.m.
#25
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: sensonfire
Nothing.

The same things you said about Zegras can be said about Stutzle as well.


Z has 2007 times as much value as Stuzle, simply because of the ‘07 Cup win over the Sens.

Why? My understanding is that Timmy’s mother ran into Ray Emery’s (RIP) hummer, causing him to be real, real bad in the final game.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll