SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brock to Buffalo

Created by: alwaysnextyear
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2022
Published: Jun. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
5$4,200,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Kuzmenko, Andrei
1$925,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Liljegren, Timothy$4,200,000
2023 2nd round pick
Trades
VAN
  1. 2022 1st round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
*16th overall pick*
BUF
  1. Boeser, Brock [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
BUF given permission to negotiate a Boeser extension before the trade
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$76,689,167$1,250,000$1,150,000$5,810,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Kuzmenko, Andrei
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,200,000$4,200,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 16, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 31
I think Buffalo would be ok with this deal as long as they could move Olofsson and get a good return as well.
Skyraider112 and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 3:34 p.m.
#2
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,979
Likes: 3,299
Quoting: Sabrebluehs
I think Buffalo would be ok with this deal as long as they could move Olofsson and get a good return as well.


Its a fair trade, but Boeser's injuries always make me leery of him
Jun. 16, 2022 at 3:40 p.m.
#3
Funksoljah
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: Sabrebluehs
I think Buffalo would be ok with this deal as long as they could move Olofsson and get a good return as well.


I just don't see how this is a clear upgrade over VO. VO will likely be cheaper and you get similar production from both. Boeser scored a few more goals this past season, and he also got 3 more minutes per game. VO put up more points in total with less ice time. Neither are great defensively, and neither of them play on the penalty kill.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
#4
matt
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 602
Likes: 220
Quoting: Funksoljah
I just don't see how this is a clear upgrade over VO. VO will likely be cheaper and you get similar production from both. Boeser scored a few more goals this past season, and he also got 3 more minutes per game. VO put up more points in total with less ice time. Neither are great defensively, and neither of them play on the penalty kill.


or they have the money to have both. Also ones is a left shot and ones a right shot so dont really see the either/or of it when you have this roster.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 3:49 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 2,045
Quoting: mbaer84
or they have the money to have both. Also ones is a left shot and ones a right shot so dont really see the either/or of it when you have this roster.


They don't have the money. Ownership isn't spending past the floor. The whole reason Olofsson might get moved is because they don't want to pay him 4.5 mil on a long term deal. Why would they take on Boeser who's qualifying offer gives him a ton of leverage for a deal that starts at minimum of 7.5 mil?
Jun. 16, 2022 at 4:02 p.m.
#6
Funksoljah
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: mbaer84
or they have the money to have both. Also ones is a left shot and ones a right shot so dont really see the either/or of it when you have this roster.


My comment was in response to someone suggesting we move VO to make space. Regardless I don't see the need for Boeser when they already have Tuch and Okposo along with Quinn on the RW. They also have several players like Peterka and Asplund who play both wings.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 4:10 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 4,292
Likes: 2,340
Quoting: Funksoljah
My comment was in response to someone suggesting we move VO to make space. Regardless I don't see the need for Boeser when they already have Tuch and Okposo along with Quinn on the RW. They also have several players like Peterka and Asplund who play both wings.


If they add a forward it would be a center.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 5:38 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 1,386
VAN is looking to bring Boeser back.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 12:23 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 4,797
Edited Jun. 17, 2022 at 12:30 a.m.
Quoting: Sabrebluehs
I think Buffalo would be ok with this deal as long as they could move Olofsson and get a good return as well.
Quoting: Skyraider112
Its a fair trade...
Quoting: Funksoljah
I just don't see how this is a clear upgrade over VO...
Quoting: mbaer84
...One is a left shot and one a right shot...
Quoting: Stadel
... Ownership isn't spending past the floor...a deal that starts at minimum of 7.5 mil?
What are the odds of getting a player better than Brock or as good as with the 16th OA?
Since: "Additional Details: BUF given permission to negotiate a Boeser extension before the trade" Buffalo would know the terms before making the trade.
Brock would take Hinostroza's spot, that my friends is a HUGE upgrade.
The Sabres would start to resemble a playoff team with Tuch, Boeser, Quinn and Okposo on RW with Skinner, Olofsson, Asplund and Girgensons on LW.
I would make this trade and wait for the season to start as based on historic drafts there is less than 1 out of 3 chance of getting a good player with the 16th OA pick.

2000 Marcel Hossa
2001 R.J. Umberger
2002 Jakub Klepis
2003 Steve Bernier
2004 Petteri Nokelainen
2005 Alex Bourret
2006 Ty Wishart
2007 Colton Gillies
2008 Joe Colborne
2009 Nick Leddy
2010 Vladimir Tarasenko
2011 Joel Armia
2012 Tom Wilson
2013 Nikita Zadorov
2014 Sonny Milano
2015 Mathew Barzal
2016 Jakob Chychrun
2017 Juuso Valimaki
2018 Liam Foudy
Jun. 17, 2022 at 12:40 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Funksoljah
I just don't see how this is a clear upgrade over VO. VO will likely be cheaper and you get similar production from both. Boeser scored a few more goals this past season, and he also got 3 more minutes per game. VO put up more points in total with less ice time. Neither are great defensively, and neither of them play on the penalty kill.


Boeser is pretty good defensively, and he's more dynamic than Olofsson
Jun. 18, 2022 at 11:18 p.m.
#11
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,979
Likes: 3,299
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
What are the odds of getting a player better than Brock or as good as with the 16th OA?
Since: "Additional Details: BUF given permission to negotiate a Boeser extension before the trade" Buffalo would know the terms before making the trade.
Brock would take Hinostroza's spot, that my friends is a HUGE upgrade.
The Sabres would start to resemble a playoff team with Tuch, Boeser, Quinn and Okposo on RW with Skinner, Olofsson, Asplund and Girgensons on LW.
I would make this trade and wait for the season to start as based on historic drafts there is less than 1 out of 3 chance of getting a good player with the 16th OA pick.

2000 Marcel Hossa
2001 R.J. Umberger
2002 Jakub Klepis
2003 Steve Bernier
2004 Petteri Nokelainen
2005 Alex Bourret
2006 Ty Wishart
2007 Colton Gillies
2008 Joe Colborne
2009 Nick Leddy
2010 Vladimir Tarasenko
2011 Joel Armia
2012 Tom Wilson
2013 Nikita Zadorov
2014 Sonny Milano
2015 Mathew Barzal
2016 Jakob Chychrun
2017 Juuso Valimaki
2018 Liam Foudy


Sure but how many good players have been picked in the last 20 years with any 1st round pick from 16-onwards. Because you have a chance to draft any player remaining on the board with 16th OA. Like I said, fair trade but only if Boeser can stay healthy and I say thats more unlikely than us getting a good player at 16th OA
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll