I think that Edmonton, and know that Las Vegas, would say Thanks but no thanks.

Not sure how I feel about the Chicago deal, but I don't think it matters because I think we'll get universal declines from Black Hawk fans.

EDM says no, but less politely. First off, Silfverberg is a cap dump and would cost you to move. Secondly, his cap hit in much higher than Pulj's would be which would negate the primary reason for trading Pulj: to sign a top-6 scorer (Kane or otherwise). Think even a little about the opposing team's perceptions and needs before posting.

I think Edmonton would say no if that pick were the 42nd overall.

I'll take it one further: I think they say no regardless of what pick it is.

lmao are you out of your mind? Theo alone isn't worth that dogpoo offer. not even close. I wouldnteven accept that just for white cloud. I get were all homers but cmon what fantasyland do you live in? 2 garbage prospects and a B prospect? for one of the best dmen in the league on the best contract possible? wtf

The only thing in here that your were right about was that Vegas says no. The rest of what you said is pretty “dogpoo”. Taking about being homers, you should probably leave your bubble.

I would expect a Cat proposal to start with McTavish as the centre piece and build from there.

Not knocking Gibson's value but he's not what we are needing in a rebuild.