The last 3 seem unlikely but the first 3 could be possible. Toronto might want a bit more for that pick though.

25,26 and 29 would not get the CBJ to give up #6. Could see them maybe trading #12 for that.

I'm counting on the fact that drafting 4 times in the 1st means something to them... for the 13th pick it'll be a massive L on habs side

Impossible Seattle does that
Like not even close

Both mtl and Anaheim are early picks in rnd

And it's easy making bad Seattle trade here because they have literally 0 fans to come after you

Your bottom line (last trade) illustrates an interesting discrepancy between the two draft pick value charts I have. The one from 2016 evaluates 29 + 26 + 25 = 8, while the one published by @NHLfan10506 has 29 + 26 + 25 = 4. I'm with @dk325: the more conservative chart seems more realistic to me.

I'm sure if there's a good deal to move into the first round from 35th OA, Seattle will make it themselves, thanks!

Literally! Lol

I think they would just rather keep the pick and draft one possibly better player over 3 what could be lesser players. That said if they are really high on a few players around that point I could see them maybe moving #12.

Don’t see like any of these happening, a low 4th and a 6th for a 3rd? A 7th and a 5th for a 4th? The difference between all of these picks are way to large to even be considered

It would definitely be a move I think they would only make if they think theres a chance that some solid players slide significantly in the draft. Like say they believe 2 or 3 of Miro, Yurov, Geekie, Lambert, Kasper, Howard and maybe some others are available in that range then it becomes a considerable swap for #12.

#35 vs #75 + #98 + #194
Really

It mattered last year when we were short on higher-end prospects. Now we need quality.