Quoting: TheRealisticGuy
I'm torn with Petry's value
Kent Hughes said he won't give assets to another team to take Petry. So from that sentence, that means Petry has negative value. But after, he says if we get a decent offer for Jeff, he WILL trade him ... Then the insiders are saying 4 to 6 teams are trying to acquire Jeff Petry ... So wtf does that mean, teams would take him for 'free' but K. Hughes isn't ready to just gave him away ?
This. I look at it two ways:
1) Always a chance that someone does something foolish like overpays for a 90 year old RD, but there's a decent chance that it's kinda like the Chiarot situation-in their hearts, most people knew some dummy was going to give up a 1st for him, we just all hoped it wasn't going to be our team.
2) If I was willing to sped $6.5 mil for 3 years of Petry, why wouldn't I just give Klingberg a bit more and at least get a few prime(ish) years out of him before he ultimately declines. Or, target another cheaper option.
I'd say it's 50/50 TBH. While Dallas dumping Dobie is good for them, Montreal also gets major cap relief here too.
Man, that's a ramble filled post on my end