SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rakell And Manson Return

Created by: Bbpagewolf
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 22, 2022
Published: Jun. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$775,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$925,000
2$1,050,000
3$2,950,000
3$3,000,000
4$3,800,000
2$2,550,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,750,000
2$775,000
2$900,000
4$2,300,000
5$5,500,000
2$775,000
2$4,500,000
4$4,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Korchinski, Kevin
3$925,000
Howard, Isaac
3$925,000
Trades
1.
ANA
    Not qualified
    ARI
    1. Elvenes, Lucas [RFA Rights]
    2. Guhle, Brendan [RFA Rights]
    3. Larsson, Jacob [RFA Rights]
    2.
    ANA
    1. Kapanen, Kasperi [RFA Rights]
    2. 2023 2nd round pick (PIT)
    3. 2024 3rd round pick (PIT)
    PIT
    3.
    ANA
    1. Bear, Ethan [RFA Rights]
    2. Gardiner, Jake
    3. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
    CAR
    1. Jones, Max
    2. Shattenkirk, Kevin ($1,950,000 retained)
    4.
    ANA
    1. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
    2. 2023 3rd round pick (MTL)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NSH
    2023
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2024
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,500,000$69,356,667$0$4,200,000$13,143,333
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,037,500$2,037,500
    LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C, LW
    RFA - 3
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 6
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,950,000$2,950,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    $3,800,000$3,800,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,300,000$2,300,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $425,000$425,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    $2,550,000$2,550,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $4,050,000$4,050,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $900,000$900,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $750,000$750,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 4:16 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 8,566
    Likes: 3,319
    Why does Manson return with no term?
    DirtyDangle liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 6:46 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 15,275
    Likes: 11,653
    Manson, Marchment, Bura are all nice adds I like while Rakell, ZAR, and the Gardiner trade are no thank yous to me

    I think I may rather try getting a Brock Boeser possibly to play where Rakell is

    Kapanen is making too much as well
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:23 a.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Iceman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 749
    Likes: 84
    Quoting: GMBL
    Why does Manson return with no term?

    Because by then Drew Helleson should be ready and if all goes according to plan his ceiling is Josh Manson 2.0, but a better skater and a slightly better knack for offense.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:35 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Iceman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 749
    Likes: 84
    Quoting: GeneralLandro
    Manson, Marchment, Bura are all nice adds I like while Rakell, ZAR, and the Gardiner trade are no thank yous to me

    I think I may rather try getting a Brock Boeser possibly to play where Rakell is

    Kapanen is making too much as well

    ZAR is an elite defensive forward who could be detrimental to the Ducks penalty kill going forward. I think re-signing him is pretty realistic and $2.3 million AAV for 4 years is a steal. The Gardiner trade essentially gives the Ducks defenseman in Ethan Bear who is still pretty young and a free 2nd for one year of Jake Gardiner, and older dman in Kevin Shattenkirk who might not even play well this coming season, and an injury risk Max Jones who’s more of a liability at this point. I honestly don’t know how the Ducks say no to a trade like this if it’s offered to them unless more can be added going the Ducks way. As for Rakell, that I can agree could not happen at all, but I don’t think bringing him back would be terrible. He’s familiar with the system, he still has plenty of good years left, and it just feels like a direction that Verbeek would want to go if presented to him. As for Kapanen, I really don’t know what a good number for him is but I’m sure he’ll make at least a little bit more than his last contract regardless.
    Pattymelt47 and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:58 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 33
    Likes: 24
    If Manson is only getting 2 years, he'll likely require a much higher AAV

    The Henrique deal is a tough one. Pitt would have to be very desperate to take on his contract, and they'd still be giving up a lot. Plus, from a Ducks perspective, Terry played his best when on a line with Henrique and this trade would leave the Ducks very young at center with little to no insurance.

    Why not bring back Elvenes?
    OldNYIfan and Salzy liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:38 a.m.
    #6
    Do it now!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2022
    Posts: 823
    Likes: 156
    Kapanen, 2nd, 3rd for Henrique, Steel

    Kapanen >> Steel
    Henrique is fine, but he is not going to be top-6 for the Penguins and is not worth a $6M cap hit.

    Pens counter: Zucker, 3rd for Henrique, Steel (and frankly, because of Henrique's cap hit, I don't think that the Pens even do this)
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:04 a.m.
    #7
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,117
    Likes: 25,034
    Quoting: Pattymelt47
    If Manson is only getting 2 years, he'll likely require a much higher AAV

    The Henrique deal is a tough one. Pitt would have to be very desperate to take on his contract, and they'd still be giving up a lot. Plus, from a Ducks perspective, Terry played his best when on a line with Henrique and this trade would leave the Ducks very young at center with little to no insurance.

    Why not bring back Elvenes?


    Haven't seen you involved with the hardcore cadre of Anaheim fans before, most of whom are in this thread but not @Lenny7 and @Salzy. Welcome!
    Salzy, Pattymelt47 and Lenny7 liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:12 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,138
    Likes: 5,938
    Ducks cannot afford to trade Henrique and not address a reliable veteran C that can play on all 4 lines

    Id rather keep Milano over both Marchment and Kapanen (especially with that contract he got here)

    Waaay to big of a contract to give out to Bura, That Rakell deal is too rich for me as well, I dont see him coming back

    Quoting: WhyWait
    Kapanen, 2nd, 3rd for Henrique, Steel

    Kapanen >> Steel
    Henrique is fine, but he is not going to be top-6 for the Penguins and is not worth a $6M cap hit.

    Pens counter: Zucker, 3rd for Henrique, Steel (and frankly, because of Henrique's cap hit, I don't think that the Pens even do this)


    That "counter" implies Henrique is negative value, which could not be further from the truth
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:21 a.m.
    #9
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,117
    Likes: 25,034
    Quoting: Bbpagewolf
    ZAR is an elite defensive forward who could be detrimental to the Ducks penalty kill going forward. I think re-signing him is pretty realistic and $2.3 million AAV for 4 years is a steal. The Gardiner trade essentially gives the Ducks defenseman in Ethan Bear who is still pretty young and a free 2nd for one year of Jake Gardiner, and older dman in Kevin Shattenkirk who might not even play well this coming season, and an injury risk Max Jones who’s more of a liability at this point. I honestly don’t know how the Ducks say no to a trade like this if it’s offered to them unless more can be added going the Ducks way. As for Rakell, that I can agree could not happen at all, but I don’t think bringing him back would be terrible. He’s familiar with the system, he still has plenty of good years left, and it just feels like a direction that Verbeek would want to go if presented to him. As for Kapanen, I really don’t know what a good number for him is but I’m sure he’ll make at least a little bit more than his last contract regardless.


    I like what you say here and the entire ACGM but surely "detrimental" is the completely wrong word? Or did you mean to say "whose loss would be detrimental"?
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:27 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,022
    Likes: 723
    Quoting: Bbpagewolf
    ZAR is an elite defensive forward who could be detrimental to the Ducks penalty kill going forward.

    an injury risk Max Jones who’s more of a liability at this point.


    I like ZAR fine and all but his name and "elite" don't belong in the same sentence.

    Jones had a freak injury where he tore a muscle. I don't know how that makes him any more of an injury risk than any other human on the planet. And liability? That's a really odd take from outer space. I have no idea where that comes from.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:37 a.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Iceman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 749
    Likes: 84
    Elvenes already told the team he wasn’t re-signing and that he was going to play overseas.
    CHAR liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:39 a.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Iceman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 749
    Likes: 84
    Quoting: Pattymelt47
    If Manson is only getting 2 years, he'll likely require a much higher AAV

    The Henrique deal is a tough one. Pitt would have to be very desperate to take on his contract, and they'd still be giving up a lot. Plus, from a Ducks perspective, Terry played his best when on a line with Henrique and this trade would leave the Ducks very young at center with little to no insurance.

    Why not bring back Elvenes?

    Elvenes already told the Ducks he was leaving and that he would be playing overseas.
    Pattymelt47 liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:44 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,022
    Likes: 723
    Quoting: Pattymelt47

    Why not bring back Elvenes?


    The reasoning would be that you have limited roster spots in San Diego and you'd rather give one of those spots to a different player. Groulx, Lupina and O'Reagan are the centers under contract at the moment so obviously they need a couple more. Ideally though the guy they sign will be a fringe NHL guy. Someone to be a leader down in the AHL or a call up if needed (a younger Sam Carrick). I don't see Elvenes as being a fringe NHL guy so a different player could make more sense.

    I have no strong feeling either way - sign him or let him walk - personally. Both options are inconsequential when compared to the Ducks other roster questions.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:45 a.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,022
    Likes: 723
    Quoting: Bbpagewolf
    Elvenes already told the Ducks he was leaving and that he would be playing overseas.


    Interesting. That's news I wasn't aware of.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 11:27 a.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 8,566
    Likes: 3,319
    Quoting: Bbpagewolf
    Because by then Drew Helleson should be ready and if all goes according to plan his ceiling is Josh Manson 2.0, but a better skater and a slightly better knack for offense.

    I meant why would he choose to do such a thing as a 30 yo player.

    Quoting: Pattymelt47
    If Manson is only getting 2 years, he'll likely require a much higher AAV


    Probably near double, so that he makes the salary of 4 years at least.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 11:53 a.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Iceman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 749
    Likes: 84
    Quoting: CHAR
    Interesting. That's news I wasn't aware of.

    It’s even on eliteprospects.
    https://www.eliteprospects.com/transfer/2022/05/24/lucas-elvenes-in-a-confirmed-transaction-to-hv71/486278?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll