SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

22-23

Created by: audiodave
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 20, 2022
Published: Jun. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
3$3,000,000
2$900,000
2$800,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$1,000,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
VAN
  1. 2023 4th round pick (DAL)
3.
VAN
    Future considerations, etc.
    4.
    5.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2023
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2024
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,500,000$76,997,500$1,250,000$1,700,000$5,502,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,350,000$7,350,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW, LW
    RFA - 2
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 5
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $950,000$950,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $950,000$950,000
    C, LW
    UFA
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    LD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    RD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,260,000$7,260,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $762,500$762,500
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
    $2,325,000$2,325,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $950,000$950,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 2,017
    Likes: 434
    Mikeyev won't sign that, he is looking for 4-5M
    audiodave liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:35 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 16,793
    Likes: 7,439
    Poolman's contact is way too bad to take on at any cost.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:42 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 1,228
    Quoting: TheOtherAuston
    Mikeyev won't sign that, he is looking for 4-5M


    I'd probably go as high as 3.5-4M. Beyond that I'd look for other options.
    Knuckl3s liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 8:50 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 1,228
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Poolman's contact is way too bad to take on at any cost.


    We have really good future considerations in Vancouver.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:10 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 12,629
    Likes: 5,472
    Bruins reject. If they move Carlo, it should be for futures (picks/prospects instead of 25yo+ player) and for fair value.
    Knuckl3s liked this.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:15 p.m.
    #6
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: audiodave
    We have really good future considerations in Vancouver.


    Poolman isn't even viewed as a negative asset by Vancouver's front office FOR EVERYONE'S INFORMATION
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:15 p.m.
    #7
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Hoglander > Roy

    Brossoit is also a negative asset
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:32 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 1,228
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Hoglander > Roy

    Brossoit is also a negative asset


    I think Hoglander and Roy are fairly close in value. Brossoit and Ferland are both negative assets.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:35 p.m.
    #9
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: audiodave
    I think Hoglander and Roy are fairly close in value. Brossoit and Ferland are both negative assets.


    Ferland is NOT negative asset, did you see how little it cost Dallas to unload Ben Bishop?
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:35 p.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 1,228
    Quoting: bhavikp27
    Bruins reject. If they move Carlo, it should be for futures (picks/prospects instead of 25yo+ player) and for fair value.


    What do you consider fair value for Carlo? I think Boston needs a top 6 RW and Garland is young and signed to a good contract.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:37 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 1,228
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Ferland is NOT negative asset, did you see how little it cost Dallas to unload Ben Bishop?


    For a team that wants to accrue cap space over the season he is.
    Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:40 p.m.
    #12
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: audiodave
    For a team that wants to accrue cap space over the season he is.


    Then Ferland will be traded to a team that plans on being capped out, simple as that. Such a team won't value him negatively
    Jun. 23, 2022 at 9:08 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 12,629
    Likes: 5,472
    Quoting: audiodave
    What do you consider fair value for Carlo? I think Boston needs a top 6 RW and Garland is young and signed to a good contract.


    If the Bruins still try to win next year, they could use a top6 RW but not with Carlo going back as it would leave a hole in the top4 defense. I don't expect the Bruins to move Carlo anyways. If they did, I would use the Lindholm and Muzzin deals' returns as comparables (A 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd).
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll