SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Input on trade values is appreciated

Created by: SupremeBone
Team: 2022-23 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 24, 2022
Published: Jun. 24, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The team reinforces its forward group with Brown (& Holloway), secures a more cost-efficient goal scorer (Olofsson), and builds out the bottom-6 with physical players that can also actually contribute more than just physicality (Carrier, Joshua, & ZAR).

Stralman adds veteran support to a host of upcoming young LD and Allen provides a competent support goalie for relatively cheap that allows the team to not commit to a goalie long-term before knowing what they have in Skinner. Also, the team frees itself from reliance on LTIR as Smith retires.

The roster still has its flaws, though. The top-6 may be somewhat lacking in physicality as the drop-off between Kane and Olofsson is substantial, the overall scoring punch of the middle of the roster is quite reliant on youth, the D corps isn't particularly inspiring, and the ceiling for the goaltending is league-average at best.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,000,000
2$1,175,000
3$3,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,000,000
2$900,000
1$1,000,000
1$800,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Olofsson, Victor [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [RFA Rights]
2.
EDM
  1. Carrier, William
  2. 2023 4th round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Shore, Devin ($425,000 retained)
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (DAL)
4.
EDM
  1. Allen, Jake ($1,437,500 retained)
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (ANA)
MTL
  1. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
5.
EDM
  1. Brown, Connor ($1,800,000 retained)
OTT
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. 2023 1st round pick (EDM)
6.
EDM
ARI
  1. Klefbom, Oscar
  2. 2022 7th round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$81,393,629$896,000$1,350,000$1,106,371
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,437,500$1,437,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 24, 2022 at 10:27 a.m.
#1
Hide yo girl
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 1,131
Yeah Habs accept that.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 10:29 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 45
Likes: 9
I think the trade for Allen might be better suited for next years trade deadline. It’s very rare for teams to retain salary unless it’s at that time. If you would want Montreal to retain before that you’d probably have to take The 2nd round pick off the table. Other than that I don’t think it’s that far off
SMH and SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 10:29 a.m.
#3
Skedn
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 165
Likes: 96
In term of value for Allen I think it’s good, but I wouldn’t trade him for this deal simply because we don’t know if Price will be able to comeback next season. Unless the direction is okay with Primeau being the #1 goalie I wouldn’t trade Allen. Value is there, the circonstance make it hard to accept.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 10:43 a.m.
#4
Funksoljah
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1,222
Can't see Olofsson signing for under 4 million. The general thinking around Buffalo has been in the 4.75 range for what he'd take.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 11:25 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 4,799
Edited Jun. 24, 2022 at 11:32 a.m.
"Input on trade values is appreciated"
Here it is!

@SupremeBone Surely you jest one for one.
First, Jesse plays on a team that scored 58 more goals than Buffalo but Olofsson scored 50% more goals and pts than Jesse.
Second, Puljujärvi played with either Leon or Connor over 75% of the time and managed to scrape together 14 goals and 36 pts in 65 games.
Third, Olofsson played with Cozens, Asplund, Krebs, Okposo, Mittelstadt, Jankowski, Eakin, Ruotsalainen, Murray and Quinn about 50% of the time and managed 20 goals and 49 pts in 72 games, yet you somehow think they are equal.
Fourth, take Jesse away from Connor and Leon and he may not get 10 goals.
Give Victor 75% of his ice time with Connor and Leon, he would probably more than double Jesse's 14 and get 30 goals.
Fifth, 14 goals in 65 games is only one more than Hinostroza got in 62 games, in other words, Vinnie is probably as good as Puljujärvi if Vinnie played wing for Connor or Leon!
That is a horrible deal for Buffalo!
Please stop pretending Puljujärvi has much value when a journey NHL RW playing on a team that is among the lowest scoring teams in the NHL has only ONE less goal than Jesse!

@Funksoljah

I forgot to add, Tuch, Okposo, Quinn and Hinostroza, Buffalo does not have a spot in the line up for Jesse.
Olofsson would be Buffalo's 2nd line LW, Jesse would be in the press box.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 11:42 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
"Input on trade values is appreciated"
Here it is!

SupremeBone Surely you jest one for one.
First, Jesse plays on a team that scored 58 more goals than Buffalo but Olofsson scored 50% more goals and pts than Jesse.
Second, Puljujärvi played with either Leon or Connor over 75% of the time and managed to scrape together 14 goals and 36 pts in 65 games.
Third, Olofsson played with Cozens, Asplund, Krebs, Okposo, Mittelstadt, Jankowski, Eakin, Ruotsalainen, Murray and Quinn about 50% of the time and managed 20 goals and 49 pts in 72 games, yet you somehow think they are equal.
Fourth, take Jesse away from Connor and Leon and he may not get 10 goals.
Give Victor 75% of his ice time with Connor and Leon, he would probably more than double Jesse's 14 and get 30 goals.
Fifth, 14 goals in 65 games is only one more than Hinostroza got in 62 games, in other words, Vinnie is probably as good as Puljujärvi if Vinnie played wing for Connor or Leon!
That is a horrible deal for Buffalo!
Please stop pretending Puljujärvi has much value when a journey NHL RW playing on a team that is among the lowest scoring teams in the NHL has only ONE less goal than Jesse!

Funksoljah

I forgot to add, Tuch, Okposo, Quinn and Hinostroza, Buffalo does not have a spot in the line up for Jesse.
Olofsson would be Buffalo's 2nd line LW, Jesse would be in the press box.


Alright, well that's an interestingly passionate take tears of joy

I'd rebut your arguments by pointing to one key point that your argument ignores: much of Puljujarvi's value is his defensive and possession prowess (his on-ice impacts are substantial, w/ and w/o Connor). Olofsson is very clearly the better offensive player but I recall him having some notable defensive deficiencies- correct me if I'm wrong, though. My view is they're both worth somewhere around a late-1st with each having their own strengths and flaws.

Regardless of my disagreement with your analysis, I appreciate the feedback!
Jun. 24, 2022 at 11:43 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: Funksoljah
Can't see Olofsson signing for under 4 million. The general thinking around Buffalo has been in the 4.75 range for what he'd take.


Fair enough. I wonder if that would change if the contract was a 2 year deal to build some value for himself heading into UFA status.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
#8
Funksoljah
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: gretzkyghosts


Funksoljah

I forgot to add, Tuch, Okposo, Quinn and Hinostroza, Buffalo does not have a spot in the line up for Jesse.
Olofsson would be Buffalo's 2nd line LW, Jesse would be in the press box.


Personally I like Bison King, he definitely didn't have much puck luck this season but he does a lot of things that most Sabres forwards don't do. He helps drive offense in ways a bit similar to Tuch, by creating space for the other forwards. He'll win board battles and forcheck, he'll back check and suppress shots, he'll create turnovers that lead to scoring chances. I think him on a line with Cozens would be a nightmare for opposing teams to deal with. Remove Hino from the equation and you then have RW depth of Tuch, Quinn, Puljujarvi, and Okposo. That's about as solid as you can get from that perspective.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#9
thewookie1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 1,014
I think I’d take that trade with Olofsson. Sir Pool is a different type of forward and in theory would give us a bit more balance overall.

Perhaps a conditional pick can go to Buffalo if Olofsson scores 30 next year?
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 1,002
Isn't Klefbom's contract uninsured? No way Arizona takes it on.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:19 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: thewookie1
I think I’d take that trade with Olofsson. Sir Pool is a different type of forward and in theory would give us a bit more balance overall.

Perhaps a conditional pick can go to Buffalo if Olofsson scores 30 next year?


Hmm, I'd be willing to at least consider that. Wouldn't be comfortable with it being a high pick, though.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
I think all of the trades are fairly reasonable. Might tweak a couple but generally they’re on point - good work.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: Burnout
Isn't Klefbom's contract uninsured? No way Arizona takes it on.


In all honesty, I'm not clear on what's insured and what's not. Is there a reason it wouldn't be given it's career-ending arthritis derived from playing hockey? It wouldn't be a strictly necessary move as it was only made to get EDM out of LTIR reliance.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:21 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: vikhodush
I think all of the trades are fairly reasonable. Might tweak a couple but generally they’re on point - good work.


Alright, thanks for the input! If you care to share, any particular tweaks you would point to?
vikhodush liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: SupremeBone
Alright, thanks for the input! If you care to share, any particular tweaks you would point to?


I’d lessen picks coming back to oil in Allen trade because of retention. Would also probably add a conditional pick going to BUF based on Olof production.
SupremeBone liked this.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:28 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 1,002
Quoting: SupremeBone
In all honesty, I'm not clear on what's insured and what's not. Is there a reason it wouldn't be given it's career-ending arthritis derived from playing hockey? It wouldn't be a strictly necessary move as it was only made to get EDM out of LTIR reliance.


Typically teams only insure their 3 to 4 most expensive contracts and I thought I read somewhere Klefbom's contract wasn't insured. Being on LTIR has nothing to do with if a contract is insured or not. If its not insured, you're going to have hard time finding any team to pay over five million dollars for a player that wont play for them, let alone a team so deep in the red like Arizona.
Jun. 24, 2022 at 12:36 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 1,583
Quoting: Burnout
Typically teams only insure their 3 to 4 most expensive contracts and I thought I read somewhere Klefbom's contract wasn't insured. Being on LTIR has nothing to do with if a contract is insured or not. If its not insured, you're going to have hard time finding any team to pay over five million dollars for a player that wont play for them, let alone a team so deep in the red like Arizona.


Hmm, fair if true. I was operating under the assumption that the contract of any player who is rendered unable to play anymore qualifies as insured by the NHL or NHLPA (not exactly clear, obviously).
Jun. 24, 2022 at 3:23 p.m.
#18
thewookie1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 1,014
Quoting: SupremeBone
Hmm, I'd be willing to at least consider that. Wouldn't be comfortable with it being a high pick, though.


3rd if he hits 30, 2nd if he hits 40 goals, 50+ goals would give both?
Jun. 24, 2022 at 8:14 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 859
in terms of value, you're pretty much on the mark for Brown imo. just not the kind of deal the Sens should actually be doing if they're moving Brown, so it's a "Sens say no, but not because of value"
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll