SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One Last Run

Created by: markhpre
Team: 2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 25, 2022
Published: Jun. 25, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Please Provide Feedback
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
2$3,500,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
3$6,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$7,750,000
1$8,500,000
1$900,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Emilio Pettersen, Mathias
  2. Huckins, Cole [Reserve List]
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (CGY)
2.
3.
PIT
  1. 2022 5th round pick (CAR)
  2. 2022 7th round pick (CBJ)
4.
PIT
  1. 2024 7th round pick (ANA)
5.
VAN
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CBJ
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$80,708,334$0$0$1,791,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,750,000$7,750,000
C
UFA - 4
$6,750,000$6,750,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,500,000$8,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:25 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 480
Vancouver never picks up the phone again and phones you just to laugh at you
Knuckl3s and Userunknown liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:49 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,880
Likes: 6,386
No way in hell the Canucks are gonna do that
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:49 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Insulting offer for Boeser
majormoose007 liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:53 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 708
Likes: 236
RH was willing to part ways with pettersson for a late rd pick around the deadline but teams were treating him as a camp dump so cgy says no
easy no for boston, two pretty strong players pitt would be asking for from boston
canes would easily take that if they have the financial flexibility to do so but the bos trade wouldnt happen anyways so that is void
anh says yes
Definitely a no from vancouver
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:04 p.m.
#5
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Flames don't have the cap for that
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:10 p.m.
#6
i hate don sweeney
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
boston declines
markhpre and Userunknown liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:31 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: BestGMBenning
Vancouver never picks up the phone again and phones you just to laugh at you


46 points 71 games
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:31 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: TheAlien
No way in hell the Canucks are gonna do that


46 points in 71 games
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:32 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Insulting offer for Boeser


46 points in 71 games
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,880
Likes: 6,386
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


Then why you trading for him?
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:34 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


You wouldn't be trading for Boeser unless you are confident he will bounce back, in which case, the Canucks will just keep him
Jun. 25, 2022 at 8:36 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 480
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


If you’re basing off his production of just one season than hell no. It’s a trade that Vancouver will not consider.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 9:17 p.m.
#13
Benzino204
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 695
Boeser has enough value on his own for Vancouver to trade him by himself, and not add a cap dump.
markhpre liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:01 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: TheAlien
Then why you trading for him?


hes a good TOP 6 FOWARD he's not elite
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:01 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
You wouldn't be trading for Boeser unless you are confident he will bounce back, in which case, the Canucks will just keep him


No, I'm trading for a TOP 6 FOWARD not an elite one
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
No, I'm trading for a TOP 6 FOWARD not an elite one


Whoever said Boeser was elite?
TheAlien liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:05 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Whoever said Boeser was elite?


Your over value of him, #1, #4 prospects both NHL ready and a 2nd for a top 6 forward is the exact market value if anything an overpay but Boesers a bigger name
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:06 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
Your over value of him, #1, #4 prospects both NHL ready and a 2nd for a top 6 forward is the exact market value if anything an overpay but Boesers a bigger name


????? Hallander and Poulin have made no indication that either of them are NHL ready dude
TheAlien liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:10 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
????? Hallander and Poulin have made no indication that either of them are NHL ready dude


the only reason they are;t in the lineup is because they're on a deep playoff-capable team ofc they're not going to insert two kids with upside, they're not young bottom 6ers like o connor and zhorna. You could put both in the top 9 for Vancouver next year with established players and they give you elcs rather then overpaid contracts you should be moving anyway
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:13 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
the only reason they are;t in the lineup is because they're on a deep playoff-capable team ofc they're not going to insert two kids with upside, they're not young bottom 6ers like o connor and zhorna. You could put both in the top 9 for Vancouver next year with established players and they give you elcs rather then overpaid contracts you should be moving anyway


Bad take, Pittsburgh isn't that deep, they're secondary scoring was suspect. Considering where there roster was lacking, that's not a valid excuse to be keeping the kids out of the lineup, even in the playoffs. Also, I'm not quite sure what bad contracts you're referring to, Pittsburgh in any case should be looking to move out Dumoulin, Pettersson, McGinn, or Matheson in that case. Stop trying to pry away Boeser for pennies on the dollar, it's not happening
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:51 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Bad take, Pittsburgh isn't that deep, they're secondary scoring was suspect. Considering where there roster was lacking, that's not a valid excuse to be keeping the kids out of the lineup, even in the playoffs. Also, I'm not quite sure what bad contracts you're referring to, Pittsburgh in any case should be looking to move out Dumoulin, Pettersson, McGinn, or Matheson in that case. Stop trying to pry away Boeser for pennies on the dollar, it's not happening


Im gonna laugh when your return is no more then a mid 1st and a B prospect
No way you're telling me Pitt would put two kids in the bottom 6 in their situation this season
that's a bad take
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:54 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
Im gonna laugh when your return is no more then a mid 1st and a B prospect
No way you're telling me Pitt would put two kids in the bottom 6 in their situation this season
that's a bad take


Boeser will fetch a mid 1st and a B prospect minimum, so we can be somewhat in agreement. Poulin is a B prospect at best (that still might be a bit of a reach), but Hallander doesn't really qualify as a prospect anymore
Jun. 26, 2022 at 8:30 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Boeser will fetch a mid 1st and a B prospect minimum, so we can be somewhat in agreement. Poulin is a B prospect at best (that still might be a bit of a reach), but Hallander doesn't really qualify as a prospect anymore


hallander is 21 years old former 2nd
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:51 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
hallander is 21 years old former 2nd


Hallander is more of a reclamation project than an actual prospect now that he's coming off of his ELC. He holds little to no value now that he's about to become waivers eligible
Jun. 27, 2022 at 11:16 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Preston Markham
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 54
Likes: 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Hallander is more of a reclamation project than an actual prospect now that he's coming off of his ELC. He holds little to no value now that he's about to become waivers eligible


so because he got an early ELC he is no longer a prospect at age 21. news to me
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll