Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks

Created by: rangershockey24
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 26, 2022
Published: Jun. 26, 2022
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
Chmelevski, Alexander1$925,000
Gallant, Zachary1$925,000
Dahlén, Jonathan1$1,000,000
Leonard, John1$975,000
Blichfeld, Joachim1$975,000
Ferraro, Mario2$2,300,000
Kähkönen, Kaapo2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Harley, Thomas
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (DAL)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent ($4,000,000 retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Powell, Eamon [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 4th round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Bonino, Nick
3.
SJS
  1. Gerasimyuk, Kirill [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 4th round pick (FLA)
Additional Details:
This trade is if the Panthers trade Bob
FLA
  1. Reimer, James
Buyouts
  • Martin Jones: $2,416,667
Retained Salary Transactions
  • Brent Burns: $2,720,000 (34%)
  • Brent Burns: $4,000,000 (75.76%)
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$76,796,667$0$1,740,000$5,703,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Meier, Timo
$6,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Hertl, Tomas
$8,137,500
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Barabanov, Alexander
$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Eklund, William
$894,167
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Couture, Logan
$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Labanc, Kevin
$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Dahlén, Jonathan
$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Bordeleau, Thomas
$916,667
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Balcers, Rūdolfs
$750,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Nieto, Matt
$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Weatherby, Jasper
$842,500
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Leonard, John
$975,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Simek, Radim
$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Karlsson, Erik
$11,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Kähkönen, Kaapo
$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
Harley, Thomas
$863,333
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Merkley, Ryan
$863,333
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Hill, Adin
$2,175,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Ferraro, Mario
$2,300,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Knyzhov, Nikolai
$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Chmelevski, Alexander
$925,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
Reedy, Scott
$842,500
C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:22 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 327
Likes: 99
Will Reimer want to come back to Florida after the Panthers traded him for nothing years ago.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:22 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 429
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.


how age 38,39 40 seasons makes sense to you??? huh I'm Dallas i get as far from that as possiblr one of their top d prospects and a 2&3 wow


Bognino trade prevents TB from resigning Paul so thats a pass
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:26 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
how age 38,39 40 seasons makes sense to you??? huh I'm Dallas i get as far from that as possiblr one of their top d prospects and a 2&3 wow


Bognino trade prevents TB from resigning Paul so thats a pass


A 38, 39 and 40 Brent Burns is still better than a 34, 35 and 36 Jeff Petry any day of the year. Plus San Jose would probably gladly eat 50% of Burns just to get rid of him.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 429
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
A 38, 39 and 40 Brent Burns is still better than a 34, 35 and 36 Jeff Petry any day of the year. Plus San Jose would probably gladly eat 50% of Burns just to get rid of him.


both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:29 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Brent Burns fits the mold of Pete DeBoer not Jeff Petry. Tyson Barrie might be even better for Dallas than those other two.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:33 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 95
Likes: 56
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns fits the mold of Pete DeBoer not Jeff Petry. Tyson Barrie might be even better for Dallas than those other two.


The value of the Dallas trade is about right with the retention. It just makes no sense for Dallas to trade their only real dman prospect for a declining dman. Whether its Burns or Petry. Dallas isn’t a contender so why step backward by getting older.
Boltsradynasty and EsoYeezus69 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:34 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: SaucePass
The value of the Dallas trade is about right with the retention. It just makes no sense for Dallas to trade their only real dman prospect for a declining dman. Whether its Burns or Petry. Dallas isn’t a contender so why step backward by getting older.


I totally agree with what you're saying.
SaucePass and WallStreet83 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:24 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 457
Likes: 313
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Couldn't agree more.
Boltsradynasty liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:27 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 623
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Dallas just Hired pete Deboer so they have a positive hostory together.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:30 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 429
Quoting: vols94
Dallas just Hired pete Deboer so they have a positive hostory together.


Doesn't change the fact Burns wil be on his age 38-40 seasons and with this deal cost Dallas it's top defenseman prospect really bad trade for them .
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:35 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 623
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Doesn't change the fact Burns wil be on his age 38-40 seasons and with this deal cost Dallas it's top defenseman prospect really bad trade for them .


Dallas was stupid enough to hire Deboer. Usually that is the beginning of a list of other bad choices.
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 429
Quoting: vols94
Dallas was stupid enough to hire Deboer. Usually that is the beginning of a list of other bad choices.


i never said they absolutely won't I'm saying it'd be utter stupidity to do so
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 6:47 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 623
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
i never said they absolutely won't I'm saying it'd be utter stupidity to do so


For sure but Hiring Deboer is a win the cup in the next 2 yrs move. Deboer is terrible with young players and did not sign on for a rebuild. they feel they have a goalies for the playoffs and already lots of older guys Suter, Pavelski and Benn and Seguin who are aging badly. Dallas is a win now team. in 3 seasons its going to be bad for Dallas
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:16 p.m.
#15
Jinx god
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 9,949
Likes: 12,989
Burns wouldn’t be the worst idea, but certainly not at the cost of Harley, not even half retained.
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 8:14 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 95
Likes: 56
Quoting: vols94
For sure but Hiring Deboer is a win the cup in the next 2 yrs move. Deboer is terrible with young players and did not sign on for a rebuild. they feel they have a goalies for the playoffs and already lots of older guys Suter, Pavelski and Benn and Seguin who are aging badly. Dallas is a win now team. in 3 seasons its going to be bad for Dallas


Dallas isn’t in win now. Dallas is in just make the playoffs to keep butts in the seats. They are in a holding pattern until Johnston, Stankhoven, and Borque mature. This should coincide with Bennguin dropping off the books.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 8:20 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,741
Likes: 2,543
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.


Harley will be better than Burns before Burns’ deal is up. Take it and run? I leave it all day long. I’ll be calling for Nill’s job if he trades any of Johnston, Bourque, Stankoven, Harley, or Grush for an old defenseman
Jun. 27, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 623
Quoting: SaucePass
Dallas isn’t in win now. Dallas is in just make the playoffs to keep butts in the seats. They are in a holding pattern until Johnston, Stankhoven, and Borque mature. This should coincide with Bennguin dropping off the books.


holding onto Benn and Seguin, Resigning Pavelski, hired Deboer. none of those are rebuild moves
Jun. 27, 2022 at 8:26 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 95
Likes: 56
Like I said. It’s to keep butts in the seats. If Dallas went full tank the building would be empty. They need to try to at least make an 8 seed. As far as Benn & Seguin there isn’t any getting rid of them. They both have full no movement clauses and are not worth their money. It would be cost prohibitive to try to move their contracts.

There’s a difference between remaining competitive and being a contender.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll