I understand that, but I do know how you're gonna feel about Stanley playing every night.

I don't think you're getting Bourque for Lundkvist. I think the most Dallas would give up for him in terms of prospects is Dellandrea.

that's why I signed DeKeyser. Is Stanley really that bad?

Well, he's still youngish, so he could improve, but there are some major holes in his game.

Dubois isn't signing for that and the Jets really have no reason to sell that low on Dubois and Stanley, so there's not much of a chance this happens.

You don't get Bourque for Lundkvist. If you want Bourque, Schneider is on the table

Dubois isnt signing for that agreed, but you also have the fact that he straight up told WPG that he's walking to free agency. That says they're gonna move him. It drops his value significantly.

Not to less than what he would get as a pure rental.

2 years of PLD plus what he gets as a rental in two years is far better than this offer.

I mean you can never tell what a GM will do, but there's no incentive for Chevy to sell low now when he has 2 years of control left.

Yeah, basically my thoughts. You guys saved me some writing, thanks!

Bourque costs you Schneider. Nils gets you Dellandrea. As stated above

I mean im looking at the fiala deal, which is a first and a B+ prospect for a guy who was a point per game player at LW.
Dubois has never been a point per game player. His highest point total was 61 points.
Dubois has always had significant powerplay time, but if he comes to the rangers thats gone. So he's likely looking at 45 point seasons. unless he really picks up his game.