Quoting: Birtle34
My thought was the nmc and painting the gm into a corner, 4 years on panarin possibly better than 7/8 on gaudreau/foresburg. Possibly some change of scenery youth that are spinning there tires in Anaheim, going to need some cap, but possibly not a ton, so gain of cap room on the rangers could be as good as getting some value back. Ny never struggles with buying who they want in free agency. Not to say give panarin away, but room for a 6/7 million dollar ufa counted in the deal, would get some kicking the tires going. Not a Anaheim fan though, so not sure what the direction is?
I'd say the Ducks are looking at a 2 year plan at this point. I'm semi-surprised that they didn't go further down the Fiala road, as they were rumored to be in on him for a while, but were completely out of it when the rumors started up again yesterday. I'd be pretty into adding Debrincat, but we'll see what Chicago's plan is.
My assumption is that if the right long term addition was available, they'd have no problem using some of the assets gained from the Hampus/Manson/Rakell trades (Or at least that's what I hope!), but I doubt they'll do something just to do it. Verbeek hasn't done anything stupid trade-wise yet, his only bogey was keeping Eakins (IMO).
All a guess right now, but I'd say:
Year 1: If the right player is available, they add...likely take a 1 year dump with asset(s) attached, and see what they've got with the kids. Maybe stay competitive but likely miss the playoffs.
Year 2: Fill in the holes, raise the ceiling.